Cited by 0Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

History of Head Injury and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: An Updated Comprehensive Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of 5,033,215 Participants

Open access
Hawas, Yousef, Abdelmageed, Ahmed, Messak, Mark, Ziada, Abdulrahman, Gamal, Mohamed, Ghanem, Thoria I. Eissa, Abdelwahab, Maya Magdy, Meshref, Mostafa +1 more·2026·Neuroepidemiology

Abstract

Background: Head injury has been proposed as a potential modifiable risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, prior studies have yielded inconsistent findings. We aimed to re-evaluate this association through an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, incorporating the latest evidence and exploring the influence of injury severity, frequency, timing, and definition. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and ProQuest from inception to January 2026 was conducted. Observational studies (cohort and case-control) reporting the association between head injury and ALS risk were included. Pooled effect estimates were generated using random-effects models. Subgroup, sensitivity, cumulative, and publication bias analyses were performed. Results: Twenty-nine studies encompassing 5,033,215 participants were included. These comprised 22 case-control studies and seven cohort studies. Case-control meta-analysis showed that head injury was associated with 36% higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24–1.48; I² = 20.4%). Cohort studies showed a positive but non-significant association (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93–2.71). Subgroup analyses showed significant associations within mild, moderate, and severe injury categories and among studies with clearly defined traumatic brain injury exposure. Single head injury was associated with higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11–1.34). Conclusion: Head injury was associated with an increased risk of ALS across multiple analyses, including different injury severity levels and exposure definitions. However, the observational nature of available evidence and the possibility of reverse causation and residual confounding limit causal interpretation. Further prospective studies and mechanistic investigations are required to clarify the potential relationship between head injury and ALS development.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 observational studies and 5,033,215 participants found that a history of head injury was associated with higher odds of ALS in case-control analyses, though cohort estimates were positive but not statistically significant. The authors conclude the association is consistent across several subgroup analyses but cannot be interpreted causally because of observational design, possible reverse causation, and residual confounding.

Key findings

  • Case-control meta-analysis: head injury was associated with 36% higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24–1.48; I² = 20.4%); crude estimate was OR = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.24–1.45; I² = 39.2%).
  • Cohort studies showed a positive but non-significant association (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93–2.71; I² = 75.9%); after excluding Anns et al. 2025, the pooled RR became significant (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28–3.47; I² = 19.1%). Pooled adjusted HR was non-significant (HR = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.89–2.71; I² = 76.4%), and after excluding Zhu et al. 2025 remained non-significant (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.85–1.59; I² = 0%).
  • Subgroup analyses found significant associations for mild (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.12–1.43), moderate (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15–1.97), and severe injury (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08–1.50), and for studies explicitly defining head injury as intracranial injury/TBI (AOR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.25–1.51).
  • Single head injury was associated with higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11–1.34), while two or more injuries showed a positive but non-significant trend (AOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.93–1.82). Time-lag subgroups showed significant associations for <1 year (AOR = 3.59; 95% CI: 2.74–4.70) and >3 years (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03–1.49).

Methods

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane handbook guidance, registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261331222); searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and ProQuest from inception to January 2026.
  • Included 29 observational studies: 22 case-control studies (18,987 ALS patients and 1,602,197 controls) and seven retrospective cohort studies (226,751 exposed and 3,185,280 unexposed comparators), totaling 5,033,215 participants; 28 studies contributed data to at least one meta-analysis.
  • Pooled effect estimates used inverse-variance random-effects models on the log scale, with subgroup, sensitivity, cumulative, influence, and publication-bias analyses; heterogeneity assessed with Cochran’s Q, I², and τ².

Limitations

  • The authors state that the observational nature of the evidence, possible reverse causation, and residual confounding limit causal interpretation; cohort evidence remained weak and heterogeneous, with heterogeneity across populations, follow-up periods, ALS ascertainment methods, and head injury definitions.
  • The authors note that genetic susceptibility could not be tested in any included study, and they call for prospective studies with standardized exposure definitions, long-term follow-up, and comprehensive adjustment for genetic and environmental factors.
  • The text also makes evident design-specific limitations: case-control studies may be susceptible to recall and selection bias, while cohort studies are limited by rare ALS events, limited statistical power, and the need for prolonged follow-up.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/ned/adwag050

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 67 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Verify all 6 references — free account
  • Findingown data

    A subgroup of three studies adjusting for age, sex and/or time of ALS diagnosis showed no significant association between head injury and ALS (AOR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.83-1.54).

    “A third subgroup of three studies adjusting for age, sex and/or time of ALS diagnosis showed no significant association (AOR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.83-1.54).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The crude overall odds of ALS were 34% higher in the head injury group (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.24-1.45; I2 = 39.2%).

    “(OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.24-1.45,I 2 =39.2%)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The test for subgroup differences was not significant (p = 0.284).

    “The test for subgroup differences was not significant (p = 0.284)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Baujat plots and Viechtbauer-Cheung influence statistics did not reveal any statistical outliers in the adjusted analysis.

    “Baujat plots and Viechtbauer-Cheung influence statistics did not reveal any statistical outliers in the adjusted analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Cohort studies showed a positive but non-significant association between head injury and ALS (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93-2.71).

    “Cohort studies showed a positive but non-significant association (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93-2.71).”
    • Also stated in: § 3.3. Overall primary meta-analysis · plain
      “Four cohort studies encompassing 118,925 in exposed compared to 2,672,213 nonexposed individuals yielded non-significant association between head injury and ALS (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93-2.71,I 2 =75.9%), with substantial heterogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 35
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After exclusion of Anns et al. 2025, heterogeneity was resolved and the pooled estimate shifted to statistical significance (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28-3.47; I2 = 19.1%).

    “Heterogeneity was resolved after exclusion of Anns et al. 2025 and the pooled estimate shifted to statistical significance (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28-3.47,I 2 =19.1%).”
    • Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · plain
      “Upon excluding Anns et al. 2025, both heterogeneity resolved and statistical significance emerged.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    There was a statistically significant association between head injury and ALS across four studies reporting a time lag of less than one year (AOR = 3.59; 95% CI: 2.74-4.70).

    “There was a statistically significant association across four studies reporting a time lag of less than one year and more than three years (AOR = 3.59; 95% CI: 2.74-4.70)and (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03-1.49),with no significant heterogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although the pooled estimate was influenced by one large registry-based study (Levison et al., 2025), leave-one-out analysis showed that the association remained stable.

    “Although the pooled estimate was influenced by one large registry-based study (Levison et al., 2025), leave-one-out analysis showed that the association remained stable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    From 2016 onward, the cumulative estimate remained statistically significant and varied only between 1.34 and 1.55, converging on the final pooled estimate.

    “From 2016 onward the cumulative estimate remained statistically significant and varied only between 1.34 and 1.55, converging on the final pooled estimate.”
    • Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · hedged
      “From 2016 onward the cumulative estimate remained statistically significant and varied only between approximately 1.34 and 1.55, converging on the final pooled estimate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Savica et al. 2012 retrospectively followed high school American football players between 1946 and 1956 and did not cause any source of heterogeneity.

    “Despite that Savica et al. 2012 retrospectively followed high school American football players in the period between 1946 and 1956, it did not cause any source of heterogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Estimates from the 1980s were imprecise, with pooled ORs ranging from 1.00 to 3.03 and confidence limits between 0.14 and 15.55, reaching statistical significance only from 1987 onward.

    “Estimates from the 1980s were imprecise, with pooled ORs ranging from 1.00 to 3.03 and confidence limits between 0.14 and 15.55, reaching statistical significance only from 1987 onward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pooled adjusted HR did not reveal a statistically significant association between head injury and ALS (HR = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.89-2.71; I2 = 76.4%), with significant heterogeneity.

    “It did not reveal a statistically significant association between head injury and ALS (HR = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.89-2.71,I 2 =76.4%), with significant heterogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The included studies comprised 22 case-control studies and seven cohort studies.

    “These comprised 22 case-control studies and seven cohort studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eight studies explicitly defined head injury as a mechanical injury that led to intracranial injury and showed a statistically significant association with ALS (AOR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.25-1.51), with no heterogeneity between studies.

    “Eight studies explicitly defined head injury as a mechanical injury that led to intracranial injury (Fracture, concussion, loss of consciousness, etc).They showed a statistically significant association (AOR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.25-1.51),with no heterogeneity between studies.”
    • Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · boosted
      “Eight studies clearly identified head injury as traumatic brain injury that lead to intracranial injury (Fracture, concussion, loss of consciousness, etc).and they showed a statistically significant association.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nine studies reported a single head injury; the pooled adjusted effect estimate showed a significant association between single head injury and risk of ALS (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11-1.34), with homogeneity among included studies (I2 = 0%).

    “Nine studies reported a single head injury were included in the meta-analysis.The pooled adjusted effect estimate showed significant association between single head injury and risk of ALS (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11-1.34),with homogeneity among included studies (I 2 =0%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Anns et al. 2025 and Savica et al. 2012 had minimal impact on the adjusted model.

    “while Anns et al. 2025 and Savica et al. 2012 had minimal impact on the adjusted model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    There was a mild asymmetry observed by visual inspection of the funnel plot.

    “Regarding publication bias, there was a mild asymmetry observed by visual inspection of the funnel plot.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Estimates from studies published in the 1980s were imprecise, with pooled ORs ranging between 1.00 and 3.03 with wide CIs (range: 0.14-15.55).

    “Estimates from studies published in 1980s were imprecise, with pooled ORs ranging between 1.00 and 3.03 with wide CIs (range: 0.14 -15.55).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Omitting Zhu et al. 2025 solved the heterogeneity, but the overall direction remained insignificant (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.85-1.59; I2 = 0%).

    “Although omitting Zhu et al. 2025 solved the heterogeneity, the overall direction remained insignificant (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.85-1.59,I 2 =0%).”
    • Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · plain
      “After excluding this study, heterogeneity was resolved and the association remained non-significant (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.85-1.59;I² = 0%)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After imputation of two studies in trim-and-fill analysis, the pooled estimate changed from OR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.30-1.70) to OR 1.42 (95% CI: 1.22-1.65) and remained statistically significant.

    “After imputation of two studies, the pooled estimate changed from OR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.30-1.70)to OR 1.42 (95% CI: 1.22-1.65)and remained statistically significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Exposure to two or more head injuries showed a positive trend yet not statistically significant association with ALS (AOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.93-1.82), with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 33.5%).

    “Interestingly, exposure to two or more head injuries showed positive trend yet not statistically significant (AOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.93-1.82),with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 33.5%)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    For MND/ALS specifically in Russell et al. 2022, no events occurred in the comparison group, and the reported estimate (OR 15.17, 95% CI 2.10-178.96) was derived only after reassigning one comparison-group participant as an event; the estimate was too unstable to pool, and the study was retained in qualitative synthesis only.

    “For MND/ALS specifically, no events occurred in the comparison group, and the reported estimate (OR 15.17, 95% CI 2.10-178.96)was derived only after reassigning one comparison-group participant as an event; the estimate was therefore too unstable to pool, and the study was retained in the qualitative synthesis only [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The protocol of this study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261331222).

    “The protocol of this study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261331222).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Publication bias was assessed visually using funnel plots and statistically using Egger's regression test.

    “Publication biases were assessed visually using funnel plots and was confirmed statistically using Egger's regression test.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines and the Cochrane handbook.

    “Our systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the guidelines of metaanalysis and systematic review, including the utilization of PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines and the Cochrane handbook [15].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lifestyle factors may contribute to ALS pathogenesis through chronic inflammatory processes which cause damage to the motor units.

    “Also, lifestyle factors may contribute to ALS pathogenesis through its chronic inflammatory processes which cause damage to the motor units [33].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Case-control studies showed a more consistent association between head injury and ALS risk, which may partly reflect their greater efficiency for studying rare outcomes such as ALS and their ability to include larger numbers of cases.

    “Case-control studies showed a more consistent association between head injury and ALS risk, which may partly reflect their greater efficiency for studying rare outcomes such as ALS and their ability to include larger numbers of cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The positive trend for two or more head injuries is due to the cumulative effects of repeated trauma and the insufficient time of brain and spinal cord to be completely repaired.

    “This is due to the cumulative effects of repeated trauma and the insufficient time of brain and spinal cord to be completely repaired.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All cohort studies were deemed of good quality.

    “All cohort studies were deemed of good quality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lifestyle factors can cause metabolic derangement which might be associated with increased ALS risk.

    “Also, it can cause metabolic derangement which might be associated with increased ALS risk [34].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cohort studies provide stronger temporal evidence by assessing head injury before ALS onset and minimizing recall bias, but they are challenged by the rarity of ALS events, limited statistical power, and the requirement for prolonged follow-up to capture potential latency periods.

    “In contrast, cohort studies provide stronger temporal evidence by assessing head injury before ALS onset and minimizing recall bias, but they are challenged by the rarity of ALS events, limited statistical power, and the requirement for prolonged follow-up to capture potential latency periods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Influence diagnostics as Baujat plots and Viechtbauer-Cheung influence characteristics as well as potential outliers were assessed using a random-effects framework.

    “In addition, influence diagnostics as Baujat plots and Viechtbauer-Cheung influence characteristics as well as potential outliers were assessed using random-effects”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Regarding case-control studies, 10 were at a low risk of bias, 11 were rated as fair with some limitations, and one was rated as poor quality.

    “Regarding case-control studies, 10 were at a low risk of bias, 11 were rated as fair with some limitations, and one was rated as poor quality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    An evidence-based review by Armon and Nelson (2012), including 12 epidemiological studies, found no sufficient evidence to support a causal association between single-instance head trauma and ALS risk.

    “An evidence-based review by Armon and Nelson (2012), including 12 epidemiological studies, found no sufficient evidence to support a causal association between single-instance head trauma and ALS risk [35].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The time lag subgrouping is considered a bimodal pattern of injury time lag association to ALS, as two periods (less than one year and more than three years) were significantly correlated.

    “This is considered as a bimodal pattern of injury time lag association to ALS, as two periods (less than one year and more than three years) were significantly correlated [28].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Limited number of studies and lack of dose response hinders a definitive conclusion regarding numbers of repeated exposures.

    “Though, limited number of studies and lack of dose response hinders a definitive conclusion regarding numbers of repeated exposures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Sensitivity analyses and cumulative meta-analyses were performed to evaluate robustness and temporal stability of the evidence.

    “Moreover, sensitivity analyses and cumulative meta-analyses were performed to evaluate robustness and temporal stability of the evidence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The magnitude of the association became more stable and more precise as evidence accumulated.

    “This indicates that the magnitude of the association became more stable and more precise as evidence accumulated, although these findings should still be interpreted alongside the limitations inherent to observational evidence [19].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These abnormal TDP-43 species may act as self-templating seeds capable of recruiting native TDP-43 and promoting prion-like propagation between cells, mechanisms that are strongly implicated in ALS pathogenesis.

    “These abnormal TDP-43 species may act as self-templating seeds capable of recruiting native TDP-43 and promoting prion-like propagation between cells, mechanisms that are strongly implicated in ALS pathogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ALS is common in males due to higher exposure to toxins, environmental factors, occupational circumstances like trauma, hormonal effects (lack of protective estrogens) and genetic associations such as SOD-1 gene.

    “ALS is common in males due to higher exposure to toxins, environmental factors, occupational circumstances like trauma, hormonal effects (lacks of protective estrogens) and genetic associations such as SOD-1 gene [32].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    One possible biological explanation for an association between head trauma and ALS involves trauma-induced axonal injury and subsequent disruption of neuronal homeostasis.

    “One possible biological explanation for an association between head trauma and ALS involves trauma-induced axonal injury and subsequent disruption of neuronal homeostasis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Under pathological conditions, TDP-43 can translocate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where it undergoes misfolding, hyperphosphorylation, ubiquitination, and aggregation.

    “Under pathological conditions, TDP-43 can translocate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where it undergoes misfolding, hyperphosphorylation, ubiquitination, and aggregation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The finding that only one head injury was significantly associated with ALS could be attributed to the possibility of reverse causation.

    “However, this could be attributed to the possibility of the reverse causation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    This cumulative effect leads to chronic inflammation, activation of apoptotic mechanisms and disruption of cellular mechanisms which eventually cause toxic excitotoxicity via greater glutamate amounts release.

    “This leads to chronic inflammation, activation of apoptotic mechanisms and disruption of cellular mechanisms which eventually causing toxic excitotoxicity via greater glutamate amounts release [25][26][27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [26]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [27]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    In a New Zealand retrospective cohort of high-level rugby players, high-level rugby participation was associated with an increased risk of neurodegenerative disease (HR 1.22).

    “High-level rugby participation was associated with increased neurodegenerative disease risk (HR 1.22), including Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.61) and MND (HR 1.16).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anns et al. 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    ALS was significantly associated with a history of surgical operations before service.

    “ALS was significantly associated with a history of trauma and surgical operations before service.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kurtzke-Beebe et al. 1980

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    ALS was significantly associated with a history of trauma before service.

    “ALS was significantly associated with a history of trauma and surgical operations before service.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kurtzke-Beebe et al. 1980

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The systematic review used a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and registers only.

    “PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and registers only”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    In that New Zealand cohort, high-level rugby participation was associated with an increased risk of motor neuron disease (HR 1.16).

    “High-level rugby participation was associated with increased neurodegenerative disease risk (HR 1.22), including Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.61) and MND (HR 1.16).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anns et al. 2025 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The initial odds ratio for ALS associated with hospital-diagnosed traumatic head injury was 1.3 but declined over time.

    “The initial OR was 1.3 but declined over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Levison et al. 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

    “Quality assessment of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Despite pooling the risk ratio from four cohort studies and finding a positive association between head injury exposure and ALS, the evidence from cohort studies remains weak, heterogeneous and requires further investigation.

    “Despite pooling the risk ratio from four cohort studies and found positive association between head injury exposure and ALS, the evidence from cohort studies remains weak, heterogenous and requires further investigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This updated meta-analysis provides evidence that a history of head injury is associated with an increased risk of ALS, with consistent findings across multiple subgroup analyses and adjusted estimates.

    “This updated meta-analysis provides evidence that a history of head injury is associated with an increased risk of ALS, with consistent findings across multiple subgroup analyses and adjusted estimates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Head trauma was a significant risk factor for ALS (multivariable OR 4.045).

    “Head trauma was a significant risk factor for ALS (multivariable OR 4.045).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lian et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    Head trauma was associated with increased ALS risk (adjusted OR 1.60), particularly for injuries occurring ≥10 years before onset.

    “Head trauma was associated with increased ALS risk (adjusted OR 1.60), particularly for injuries occurring ≥10 years before onset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Although we found a significant association between head injury and ALS, our study showed limitations in determining the direction of the association.

    “Although we found a significant association between head injury and ALS, our study showed limitations in determining the direction of the association.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Results from cohort studies might be considered with caution because of the presence of heterogeneity among population, follow-up periods, ALS ascertainment methods, and head injury definition.

    “And the results from cohort studies might be considered with caution because of the presence of heterogeneity among population, follow-up periods, ALS ascertainment methods, and Head injury definition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    The standardized morbidity ratio for ALS following head trauma with presumed brain injury was 1.05 (95% CI 0.027-5.85).

    “The standardized morbidity ratio for ALS was 1.05 (95% CI 0.027-5.85)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williams et al. 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    Veterans with head injuries during the 15 years before the reference date had an adjusted OR of 2.33 for ALS.

    “Veterans with head injuries during the 15 years before the reference date had an adjusted OR of 2.33.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt et al. 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Given the observational nature of available evidence and the remaining possibility of reverse causation and residual confounding, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.

    “However, given the observational nature of available evidence and the remaining possibility of reverse causation and residual confounding, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    History of head trauma was reported in 25% of ALS cases and 13% of controls.

    “History of head trauma was reported in 25% of cases and 13% of controls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mitsi et al. 2023 source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    In that New Zealand cohort, high-level rugby participation was associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.61).

    “High-level rugby participation was associated with increased neurodegenerative disease risk (HR 1.22), including Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.61) and MND (HR 1.16).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anns et al. 2025 source
57 of 57
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Genetic susceptibility plays a central role in ALS pathogenesis.

    “Also, genetic susceptibility plays a central role in ALS pathogenesis and head trauma may act principally in genetically vulnerable individuals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Head trauma may act principally in genetically vulnerable individuals.

    “Also, genetic susceptibility plays a central role in ALS pathogenesis and head trauma may act principally in genetically vulnerable individuals.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Qureshi case count differs between study tables

    Minor

    The study-characteristics entry reports 96 cases, whereas Table 2 reports 95 ALS participants. Both give a total sample of 201.

  • Savica football-player count differs between study tables

    Minor

    One study-characteristics entry reports 439 football players among 578 participants, while Table 2 reports 438 football players and 140 non-football participants.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cherry N (2002) Environmental health and social factors associated with motor neurone disease. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health 26:574
  2. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
  3. Giza CC, Hovda DA (2001) The Neurometabolic Cascade of Concussion. Journal of athletic training 36:228- 235
  4. Chourpiliadis C, Seitz C, Lovik A, et al (2024) Lifestyle and medical conditions in relation to ALS risk and progression-an introduction to the Swedish ALSrisc Study. Journal of Neurology 271:5447-5459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12496-w · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Hawas, Y., Abdelmageed, A., Messak, M., Ziada, A., Gamal, M., Ghanem, T. I. E., Abdelwahab, M. M., Meshref, M., & Kashbour, M. O.
Corresponding author
Kashbour, Muataz Omar
Venue
Neuroepidemiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2026-10-12
Pages
1-1
ISSN
  • 0251-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0208
OpenAlex
W7221572992
Cited by
0
References
31
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroepidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS risk factors, injury severity, injury frequency, injury timing, modifiable risk factors, reverse causality, residual confounding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review