History of Head Injury and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: An Updated Comprehensive Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of 5,033,215 Participants
Open accessAbstract
Background: Head injury has been proposed as a potential modifiable risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, prior studies have yielded inconsistent findings. We aimed to re-evaluate this association through an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, incorporating the latest evidence and exploring the influence of injury severity, frequency, timing, and definition. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and ProQuest from inception to January 2026 was conducted. Observational studies (cohort and case-control) reporting the association between head injury and ALS risk were included. Pooled effect estimates were generated using random-effects models. Subgroup, sensitivity, cumulative, and publication bias analyses were performed. Results: Twenty-nine studies encompassing 5,033,215 participants were included. These comprised 22 case-control studies and seven cohort studies. Case-control meta-analysis showed that head injury was associated with 36% higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24–1.48; I² = 20.4%). Cohort studies showed a positive but non-significant association (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93–2.71). Subgroup analyses showed significant associations within mild, moderate, and severe injury categories and among studies with clearly defined traumatic brain injury exposure. Single head injury was associated with higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11–1.34). Conclusion: Head injury was associated with an increased risk of ALS across multiple analyses, including different injury severity levels and exposure definitions. However, the observational nature of available evidence and the possibility of reverse causation and residual confounding limit causal interpretation. Further prospective studies and mechanistic investigations are required to clarify the potential relationship between head injury and ALS development.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 observational studies and 5,033,215 participants found that a history of head injury was associated with higher odds of ALS in case-control analyses, though cohort estimates were positive but not statistically significant. The authors conclude the association is consistent across several subgroup analyses but cannot be interpreted causally because of observational design, possible reverse causation, and residual confounding.
Key findings
- Case-control meta-analysis: head injury was associated with 36% higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24–1.48; I² = 20.4%); crude estimate was OR = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.24–1.45; I² = 39.2%).
- Cohort studies showed a positive but non-significant association (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93–2.71; I² = 75.9%); after excluding Anns et al. 2025, the pooled RR became significant (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28–3.47; I² = 19.1%). Pooled adjusted HR was non-significant (HR = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.89–2.71; I² = 76.4%), and after excluding Zhu et al. 2025 remained non-significant (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.85–1.59; I² = 0%).
- Subgroup analyses found significant associations for mild (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.12–1.43), moderate (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15–1.97), and severe injury (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08–1.50), and for studies explicitly defining head injury as intracranial injury/TBI (AOR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.25–1.51).
- Single head injury was associated with higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11–1.34), while two or more injuries showed a positive but non-significant trend (AOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.93–1.82). Time-lag subgroups showed significant associations for <1 year (AOR = 3.59; 95% CI: 2.74–4.70) and >3 years (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03–1.49).
Methods
- Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane handbook guidance, registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261331222); searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and ProQuest from inception to January 2026.
- Included 29 observational studies: 22 case-control studies (18,987 ALS patients and 1,602,197 controls) and seven retrospective cohort studies (226,751 exposed and 3,185,280 unexposed comparators), totaling 5,033,215 participants; 28 studies contributed data to at least one meta-analysis.
- Pooled effect estimates used inverse-variance random-effects models on the log scale, with subgroup, sensitivity, cumulative, influence, and publication-bias analyses; heterogeneity assessed with Cochran’s Q, I², and τ².
Limitations
- The authors state that the observational nature of the evidence, possible reverse causation, and residual confounding limit causal interpretation; cohort evidence remained weak and heterogeneous, with heterogeneity across populations, follow-up periods, ALS ascertainment methods, and head injury definitions.
- The authors note that genetic susceptibility could not be tested in any included study, and they call for prospective studies with standardized exposure definitions, long-term follow-up, and comprehensive adjustment for genetic and environmental factors.
- The text also makes evident design-specific limitations: case-control studies may be susceptible to recall and selection bias, while cohort studies are limited by rare ALS events, limited statistical power, and the need for prolonged follow-up.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 67 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
A subgroup of three studies adjusting for age, sex and/or time of ALS diagnosis showed no significant association between head injury and ALS (AOR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.83-1.54).
“A third subgroup of three studies adjusting for age, sex and/or time of ALS diagnosis showed no significant association (AOR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.83-1.54).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The crude overall odds of ALS were 34% higher in the head injury group (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.24-1.45; I2 = 39.2%).
“(OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.24-1.45,I 2 =39.2%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The test for subgroup differences was not significant (p = 0.284).
“The test for subgroup differences was not significant (p = 0.284)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Baujat plots and Viechtbauer-Cheung influence statistics did not reveal any statistical outliers in the adjusted analysis.
“Baujat plots and Viechtbauer-Cheung influence statistics did not reveal any statistical outliers in the adjusted analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cohort studies showed a positive but non-significant association between head injury and ALS (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93-2.71).
“Cohort studies showed a positive but non-significant association (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93-2.71).”
- Also stated in: § 3.3. Overall primary meta-analysis · plain
“Four cohort studies encompassing 118,925 in exposed compared to 2,672,213 nonexposed individuals yielded non-significant association between head injury and ALS (RR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.93-2.71,I 2 =75.9%), with substantial heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.3. Overall primary meta-analysis · plain
- Findingown data
There was a statistically significant association between head injury and ALS across four studies reporting a time lag of more than three years (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03-1.49).
“There was a statistically significant association across four studies reporting a time lag of less than one year and more than three years (AOR = 3.59; 95% CI: 2.74-4.70)and (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03-1.49),with no significant heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Subgrouping based on injury severity showed a significant association between head injury and ALS for mild injury (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.12-1.43).
“Subgrouping based on injury severity showed a significant association across all subgroups: mild (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.12-1.43),moderate (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15-1.97),and severe (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50),with no heterogeneity between studies (I 2 =0%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Substantial heterogeneity in cohort studies was driven by Anns et al. 2025.
“Substantial heterogeneity was observed to be driven by Anns et al. 2025.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled effect estimate of five studies adjusting for sociodemographic variables showed a significant association between head injury and ALS (AOR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.23-1.77).
“as well as the five studies adjusting for sociodemographic variables (AOR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.23-1.77).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled effect estimate of four studies adjusting for age, sex, and lifestyle factors and/or medical comorbidities showed a significant association between head injury and ALS (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.22-1.87).
“The pooled effect estimate of four studies adjusting for age, sex, and lifestyle factors and/or medical comorbidities showed a significant association (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.22-1.87)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled event proportion of ALS among subjects with a prior history of head injury was 0.0010 (95% CI: 0.0006-0.0018).
“The pooled event proportion was 0.0010 (95% CI: 0.0006 -0.0018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In subgrouping analysis, there were differences between head trauma definitions among included studies.
“In subgrouping analysis, there were differences between head trauma definitions among included studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Egger's test did not detect any statistically significant asymmetry (t = 1.30, df = 10, p = 0.223).
“However, Egger's test did not detect any statistically significant asymmetry (t = 1.30, df = 10, p = 0.223).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Studies that did not provide a clear definition for head injury showed no statistically significant association with ALS (AOR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.55-1.38).
“Studies that did not provide clear definition for head injury showed no statistically significant association (AOR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.55-1.38)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Excluding Savica et al. produced a pooled HR of 1.64 (95% CI 0.92-2.91).
“Excluding Savica et al. produced pooled estimates of RR 1.66 (95% CI 0.95-2.88)and HR 1.64 (95% CI 0.92-2.91).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two studies with unclear definition of head injury (injury requiring medical attention with no specification) showed no significant association between head injury and ALS (AOR = 1.69; 95% CI: 0.86-3.32).
“Two studies provided unclear definition of head injury which was injury that required medical attention with no specification.They showed no significant association between head injury that required medical attention and ALS (AOR = 1.69; 95% CI: 0.86-3.32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In case-control meta-analysis, head injury was associated with significantly higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24-1.48; I2 = 20.4%).
“Case-control meta-analysis showed that head injury was associated with 36% higher odds of ALS (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24-1.48;I² = 20.4%).”
- Also stated in: § 3.3. Overall primary meta-analysis · plain
“The overall odds of developing ALS were 34-36% significantly higher in the head injury group compared to the control with no considerable heterogeneity (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24-1.48,I 2 = 20.4%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.3. Overall primary meta-analysis · plain
- Findingown data
Twenty-nine studies encompassing 5,033,215 participants were included.
“Twenty-nine studies encompassing 5,033,215 participants were included.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Subgrouping based on injury severity showed a significant association between head injury and ALS for severe injury (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50).
“Subgrouping based on injury severity showed a significant association across all subgroups: mild (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.12-1.43),moderate (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15-1.97),and severe (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50),with no heterogeneity between studies (I 2 =0%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Excluding Savica et al. produced a pooled RR of 1.66 (95% CI 0.95-2.88).
“Excluding Savica et al. produced pooled estimates of RR 1.66 (95% CI 0.95-2.88)and HR 1.64 (95% CI 0.92-2.91).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Subgrouping based on injury severity showed a significant association between head injury and ALS for moderate injury (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15-1.97).
“Subgrouping based on injury severity showed a significant association across all subgroups: mild (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.12-1.43),moderate (AOR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15-1.97),and severe (AOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08-1.50),with no heterogeneity between studies (I 2 =0%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
None of the included studies allowed testing whether head trauma acts principally in genetically vulnerable individuals.
“None of the included studies allowed this to be tested.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Genetic susceptibility plays a central role in ALS pathogenesis.
- Rests on an assumption: Head trauma may act principally in genetically vulnerable individuals.
- Premisecitation
Russell et al. 2022 followed former international rugby union players and reported a higher overall incidence of neurodegenerative disease than in matched population controls.
“Russell et al. 2022 followed former international rugby union players and reported a higher overall incidence of neurodegenerative disease than in matched population controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Different degrees of head injury may be associated with ALS risk.
“This suggests that different degrees of head injury may be associated with ALS risk.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Advanced age is a significant factor for ALS due to increased oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation and subsequent decrease in tissue repair.
“Advanced age is a significant factor for ALS due to increase oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation and subsequent decrease in tissue repair [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The elevated estimate in Zhu et al. 2025 was likely inflated by the first two years after TBI, a period vulnerable to reverse causation from prodromal ALS.
“Their elevated estimate was likely inflated by the first two years after TBI, a period vulnerable to reverse causation from prodromal ALS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of heterogeneity from Savica et al. 2012 can be attributed to the smaller historical cohort with scarcity of the event and the wide confidence interval.
“This can be attributed to the smaller historical cohort with scarcity of the event and the wide confidence interval.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The heterogeneity in Anns et al. 2025 may be due to the different population, as the population followed up was rugby players, considered a head contact sport with repeated head injury.
“The heterogeneity evolved may be due to the different population in Anns et al. 2025, as the population followed up was rugby players, which is considered a head contact sport with repeated head injury.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The very old timeline of Savica et al. 2012 predating modern ALS diagnostic criteria will result in under ascertainment of ALS cases.
“Also, the very old timeline predating modern ALS diagnostic criteria will result in the under ascertainment of ALS cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The apparent discrepancy between study designs may reflect methodological differences rather than conflicting biological evidence.
“Therefore, the apparent discrepancy between study designs may reflect methodological differences rather than conflicting biological evidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Differences in exposure definitions, ALS ascertainment methods, and follow-up duration may contribute to the greater heterogeneity observed among cohort studies.
“Additionally, differences in exposure definitions, ALS ascertainment methods, and follow-up duration may contribute to the greater heterogeneity observed among cohort studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Case-control studies may be more susceptible to recall bias and selection bias, particularly when exposure information is collected after disease diagnosis.
“However, these studies may be more susceptible to recall bias and selection bias, particularly when exposure information is collected after disease diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The lag time of more than three years between head injury and ALS may contribute to ALS pathogenesis through subsequent mechanisms and cascades of neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity and genetic vulnerability.
“While the lag time head injury, more than three years, may contribute to ALS pathogenesis through the subsequent mechanisms and cascades of neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity and genetic vulnerability [25][26][27]30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
Sensitivity analysis did not reveal that the current evidence is dependent on any individual study, as the pooled estimates and CIs remained consistent across all iterations.
“In addition, sensitivity analysis did not reveal that the current evidence is dependent on any individual study as the pooled estimates and CIs remained consistent across all iterations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These findings provide updated evidence supporting an association between head injury and ALS development.
“These findings provide updated evidence supporting an association between head injury and ALS development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Comorbid medical conditions are linked to ALS as they share multiple possible mechanisms such as chronic inflammatory processes, oxidative stress, and metabolic issues which leads to cellular dysfunction and death of motor units.
“Comorbid medical conditions are linked to ALS as they share multiple possible mechanisms such as chronic inflammatory processes, oxidative stress, and metabolic issues which leads to cellular dysfunction and death of motor units [33,34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
With the accumulation of additional epidemiological evidence, our updated analysis identified a positive association between head injury and ALS.
“However, with the accumulation of additional epidemiological evidence, our updated analysis identified a positive association between head injury and ALS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Mechanical forces during traumatic brain injury can produce diffuse axonal damage and activate cellular stress pathways, which may influence the subcellular localization and processing of TDP-43.
“Mechanical forces during traumatic brain injury can produce diffuse axonal damage and activate cellular stress pathways, which may influence the subcellular localization and processing of TDP-43.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The lag time of less than one year between head injury and ALS may be due to reverse causality hypothesis and protopathic bias, as this is a time period patients may be considered in an early disease form or subclinical forms which could be aggravated by trauma.
“The lag time head injury, less than one year, and its correlation to ALS may be due to reverse causality hypothesis and protopathic bias as this is time period patients may be considered in an early disease form or subclinical forms which could be aggravated by trauma [10,29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The association between head trauma and ALS was stronger in men (adjusted OR 2.06).
“The association was stronger in men (adjusted OR 2.06)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beaudin et al. 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The association between head injury and ALS was strongest among APOE-ε4 carriers.
“The association was strongest among APOE-ε4 carriers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The association between head trauma and ALS was absent in women.
“and absent in women”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beaudin et al. 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In that US cohort, playing high school football was not associated with an increased risk of ALS compared with nonplaying classmates.
“Playing high school football was not associated with increased risk of dementia, Parkinson's disease, or ALS compared with nonplaying classmates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Savica et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Head trauma was associated with increased ALS risk (OR 1.95).
“Head trauma was associated with increased ALS risk (OR 1.95).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seelen et al. 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
There was a dose-response relationship between head trauma and ALS.
“with a dose-response relationship”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beaudin et al. 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premiseown data
A strong association was found between severe head injury occurring ≤1 year before ALS diagnosis and ALS (OR 3.9).
“A strong association was found for severe head injury occurring ≤1 year before ALS diagnosis (OR 3.9)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
There was no evidence that head trauma is a risk factor for ALS.
“providing no evidence that head trauma is a risk factor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams et al. 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
History of head trauma was not associated with ALS causation (p=0.54).
“History of head trauma was not associated with ALS causation (p=0.54) or progression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Qureshi et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
No significant association was found between severe trauma in isolation and ALS after exclusion of traumas occurring within 5 years before diagnosis.
“No significant association was found for severe trauma in isolation after exclusion of traumas occurring within 5 years before diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seals et al. 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Former rugby players had a significantly higher risk of MND or ALS (OR 15.17, 95% CI 2.10-178.96).
“Former rugby players had a significantly higher risk of MND or ALS (OR 15.17, 95% CI 2.10-178.96).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Russel et al. 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
During service, ALS cases had an excess of hospitalizations for limb and skull fractures.
“During service, ALS cases had an excess of hospitalizations for limb and skull fractures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kurtzke-Beebe et al. 1980
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In that New Zealand cohort, neurodegenerative disease risks were higher among backline players.
“Risks were higher among backline players.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anns et al. 2025 source
- Premisecitation
Head trauma associated with functional disability was linked to approximately twofold higher ALS risk (adjusted OR 2.04).
“Head trauma associated with functional disability was linked to approximately twofold higher ALS risk (adjusted OR 2.04).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pupillo et al. 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
History of head trauma was not associated with ALS progression.
“History of head trauma was not associated with ALS causation (p=0.54) or progression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Qureshi et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Moderate-to-severe TBI was not associated with increased ALS risk (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.2).
“Moderate-to-severe TBI was not associated with increased ALS risk (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raj et al. 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premiseown data
In a UK-wide retrospective cohort using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2005-2020), the overall hazard ratio for ALS following traumatic brain injury was 2.61.
“The overall HR for ALS was 2.61, but excess risk was confined to the 2 years following TBI (HR 6.18), suggesting potential reverse causality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
No association was found between antecedent injury requiring hospitalization and later ALS development.
“No association was found between antecedent injury requiring hospitalization and later ALS development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Turner et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Previous head trauma was more frequently reported by ALS cases than controls (adjusted OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.05-2.18).
“Previous head trauma was more frequently reported by cases (adjusted OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.05-2.18)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beaudin et al. 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The odds ratio for ALS associated with traumatic head injury reached 4.5 within 6 months of diagnosis.
“OR reached 4.5 within 6 months of diagnosis, whereas no association remained when restricted to traumatic head injury >3 years before diagnosis (OR 1.1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levison et al. 2025 source
- Premisecitation
TBI was not associated with ALS in deployed post-9/11 U.S. war veterans (adjusted OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.4).
“TBI was not associated with ALS in this population (adjusted OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sagiraju et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Head trauma showed a statistically significant association with ALS (OR 2.80).
“Head trauma showed a statistically significant association with ALS (OR 2.80).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mitsi et al. 2023 source
- Premiseown data
In that UK-wide retrospective cohort, the excess risk of ALS was confined to the 2 years following traumatic brain injury (HR 6.18).
“The overall HR for ALS was 2.61, but excess risk was confined to the 2 years following TBI (HR 6.18), suggesting potential reverse causality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a US retrospective cohort (Rochester Epidemiology Project, graduation years 1946-1956), playing high school football was not associated with an increased risk of dementia compared with nonplaying classmates.
“Playing high school football was not associated with increased risk of dementia, Parkinson's disease, or ALS compared with nonplaying classmates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Savica et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In that US cohort, playing high school football was not associated with an increased risk of Parkinson's disease compared with nonplaying classmates.
“Playing high school football was not associated with increased risk of dementia, Parkinson's disease, or ALS compared with nonplaying classmates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Savica et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
No association remained between traumatic head injury and ALS when restricted to injuries occurring more than 3 years before diagnosis (OR 1.1).
“no association remained when restricted to traumatic head injury >3 years before diagnosis (OR 1.1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levison et al. 2025 source
- Premisecitation
A first trauma before age 55 was associated with ALS (OR 1.22).
“A first trauma before age 55 was associated with ALS (OR 1.22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seals et al. 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premiseown data
No association was observed between head injuries occurring >3 years before diagnosis and ALS.
“no association was observed for injuries occurring >3 years before diagnosis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Repeated head injury (≥2 events) was associated with ALS (adjusted OR 2.62).
“Repeated head injury (≥2 events) was associated with adjusted OR 2.62.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pupillo et al. 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 6
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter exclusion of Anns et al. 2025, heterogeneity was resolved and the pooled estimate shifted to statistical significance (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28-3.47; I2 = 19.1%).
“Heterogeneity was resolved after exclusion of Anns et al. 2025 and the pooled estimate shifted to statistical significance (RR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.28-3.47,I 2 =19.1%).”
- Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · plain
“Upon excluding Anns et al. 2025, both heterogeneity resolved and statistical significance emerged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThere was a statistically significant association between head injury and ALS across four studies reporting a time lag of less than one year (AOR = 3.59; 95% CI: 2.74-4.70).
“There was a statistically significant association across four studies reporting a time lag of less than one year and more than three years (AOR = 3.59; 95% CI: 2.74-4.70)and (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.03-1.49),with no significant heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough the pooled estimate was influenced by one large registry-based study (Levison et al., 2025), leave-one-out analysis showed that the association remained stable.
“Although the pooled estimate was influenced by one large registry-based study (Levison et al., 2025), leave-one-out analysis showed that the association remained stable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom 2016 onward, the cumulative estimate remained statistically significant and varied only between 1.34 and 1.55, converging on the final pooled estimate.
“From 2016 onward the cumulative estimate remained statistically significant and varied only between 1.34 and 1.55, converging on the final pooled estimate.”
- Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · hedged
“From 2016 onward the cumulative estimate remained statistically significant and varied only between approximately 1.34 and 1.55, converging on the final pooled estimate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · hedged
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningSavica et al. 2012 retrospectively followed high school American football players between 1946 and 1956 and did not cause any source of heterogeneity.
“Despite that Savica et al. 2012 retrospectively followed high school American football players in the period between 1946 and 1956, it did not cause any source of heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEstimates from the 1980s were imprecise, with pooled ORs ranging from 1.00 to 3.03 and confidence limits between 0.14 and 15.55, reaching statistical significance only from 1987 onward.
“Estimates from the 1980s were imprecise, with pooled ORs ranging from 1.00 to 3.03 and confidence limits between 0.14 and 15.55, reaching statistical significance only from 1987 onward.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pooled adjusted HR did not reveal a statistically significant association between head injury and ALS (HR = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.89-2.71; I2 = 76.4%), with significant heterogeneity.
“It did not reveal a statistically significant association between head injury and ALS (HR = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.89-2.71,I 2 =76.4%), with significant heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe included studies comprised 22 case-control studies and seven cohort studies.
“These comprised 22 case-control studies and seven cohort studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEight studies explicitly defined head injury as a mechanical injury that led to intracranial injury and showed a statistically significant association with ALS (AOR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.25-1.51), with no heterogeneity between studies.
“Eight studies explicitly defined head injury as a mechanical injury that led to intracranial injury (Fracture, concussion, loss of consciousness, etc).They showed a statistically significant association (AOR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.25-1.51),with no heterogeneity between studies.”
- Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · boosted
“Eight studies clearly identified head injury as traumatic brain injury that lead to intracranial injury (Fracture, concussion, loss of consciousness, etc).and they showed a statistically significant association.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · boosted
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNine studies reported a single head injury; the pooled adjusted effect estimate showed a significant association between single head injury and risk of ALS (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11-1.34), with homogeneity among included studies (I2 = 0%).
“Nine studies reported a single head injury were included in the meta-analysis.The pooled adjusted effect estimate showed significant association between single head injury and risk of ALS (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11-1.34),with homogeneity among included studies (I 2 =0%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAnns et al. 2025 and Savica et al. 2012 had minimal impact on the adjusted model.
“while Anns et al. 2025 and Savica et al. 2012 had minimal impact on the adjusted model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere was a mild asymmetry observed by visual inspection of the funnel plot.
“Regarding publication bias, there was a mild asymmetry observed by visual inspection of the funnel plot.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEstimates from studies published in the 1980s were imprecise, with pooled ORs ranging between 1.00 and 3.03 with wide CIs (range: 0.14-15.55).
“Estimates from studies published in 1980s were imprecise, with pooled ORs ranging between 1.00 and 3.03 with wide CIs (range: 0.14 -15.55).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOmitting Zhu et al. 2025 solved the heterogeneity, but the overall direction remained insignificant (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.85-1.59; I2 = 0%).
“Although omitting Zhu et al. 2025 solved the heterogeneity, the overall direction remained insignificant (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.85-1.59,I 2 =0%).”
- Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · plain
“After excluding this study, heterogeneity was resolved and the association remained non-significant (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.85-1.59;I² = 0%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 4. Discussion · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter imputation of two studies in trim-and-fill analysis, the pooled estimate changed from OR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.30-1.70) to OR 1.42 (95% CI: 1.22-1.65) and remained statistically significant.
“After imputation of two studies, the pooled estimate changed from OR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.30-1.70)to OR 1.42 (95% CI: 1.22-1.65)and remained statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExposure to two or more head injuries showed a positive trend yet not statistically significant association with ALS (AOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.93-1.82), with no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 33.5%).
“Interestingly, exposure to two or more head injuries showed positive trend yet not statistically significant (AOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.93-1.82),with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 33.5%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationFor MND/ALS specifically in Russell et al. 2022, no events occurred in the comparison group, and the reported estimate (OR 15.17, 95% CI 2.10-178.96) was derived only after reassigning one comparison-group participant as an event; the estimate was too unstable to pool, and the study was retained in qualitative synthesis only.
“For MND/ALS specifically, no events occurred in the comparison group, and the reported estimate (OR 15.17, 95% CI 2.10-178.96)was derived only after reassigning one comparison-group participant as an event; the estimate was therefore too unstable to pool, and the study was retained in the qualitative synthesis only [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe protocol of this study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261331222).
“The protocol of this study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261331222).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPublication bias was assessed visually using funnel plots and statistically using Egger's regression test.
“Publication biases were assessed visually using funnel plots and was confirmed statistically using Egger's regression test.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines and the Cochrane handbook.
“Our systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the guidelines of metaanalysis and systematic review, including the utilization of PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines and the Cochrane handbook [15].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLifestyle factors may contribute to ALS pathogenesis through chronic inflammatory processes which cause damage to the motor units.
“Also, lifestyle factors may contribute to ALS pathogenesis through its chronic inflammatory processes which cause damage to the motor units [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCase-control studies showed a more consistent association between head injury and ALS risk, which may partly reflect their greater efficiency for studying rare outcomes such as ALS and their ability to include larger numbers of cases.
“Case-control studies showed a more consistent association between head injury and ALS risk, which may partly reflect their greater efficiency for studying rare outcomes such as ALS and their ability to include larger numbers of cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe positive trend for two or more head injuries is due to the cumulative effects of repeated trauma and the insufficient time of brain and spinal cord to be completely repaired.
“This is due to the cumulative effects of repeated trauma and the insufficient time of brain and spinal cord to be completely repaired.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll cohort studies were deemed of good quality.
“All cohort studies were deemed of good quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLifestyle factors can cause metabolic derangement which might be associated with increased ALS risk.
“Also, it can cause metabolic derangement which might be associated with increased ALS risk [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCohort studies provide stronger temporal evidence by assessing head injury before ALS onset and minimizing recall bias, but they are challenged by the rarity of ALS events, limited statistical power, and the requirement for prolonged follow-up to capture potential latency periods.
“In contrast, cohort studies provide stronger temporal evidence by assessing head injury before ALS onset and minimizing recall bias, but they are challenged by the rarity of ALS events, limited statistical power, and the requirement for prolonged follow-up to capture potential latency periods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenInfluence diagnostics as Baujat plots and Viechtbauer-Cheung influence characteristics as well as potential outliers were assessed using a random-effects framework.
“In addition, influence diagnostics as Baujat plots and Viechtbauer-Cheung influence characteristics as well as potential outliers were assessed using random-effects”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataRegarding case-control studies, 10 were at a low risk of bias, 11 were rated as fair with some limitations, and one was rated as poor quality.
“Regarding case-control studies, 10 were at a low risk of bias, 11 were rated as fair with some limitations, and one was rated as poor quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAn evidence-based review by Armon and Nelson (2012), including 12 epidemiological studies, found no sufficient evidence to support a causal association between single-instance head trauma and ALS risk.
“An evidence-based review by Armon and Nelson (2012), including 12 epidemiological studies, found no sufficient evidence to support a causal association between single-instance head trauma and ALS risk [35].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe time lag subgrouping is considered a bimodal pattern of injury time lag association to ALS, as two periods (less than one year and more than three years) were significantly correlated.
“This is considered as a bimodal pattern of injury time lag association to ALS, as two periods (less than one year and more than three years) were significantly correlated [28].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningLimited number of studies and lack of dose response hinders a definitive conclusion regarding numbers of repeated exposures.
“Though, limited number of studies and lack of dose response hinders a definitive conclusion regarding numbers of repeated exposures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSensitivity analyses and cumulative meta-analyses were performed to evaluate robustness and temporal stability of the evidence.
“Moreover, sensitivity analyses and cumulative meta-analyses were performed to evaluate robustness and temporal stability of the evidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe magnitude of the association became more stable and more precise as evidence accumulated.
“This indicates that the magnitude of the association became more stable and more precise as evidence accumulated, although these findings should still be interpreted alongside the limitations inherent to observational evidence [19].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese abnormal TDP-43 species may act as self-templating seeds capable of recruiting native TDP-43 and promoting prion-like propagation between cells, mechanisms that are strongly implicated in ALS pathogenesis.
“These abnormal TDP-43 species may act as self-templating seeds capable of recruiting native TDP-43 and promoting prion-like propagation between cells, mechanisms that are strongly implicated in ALS pathogenesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationALS is common in males due to higher exposure to toxins, environmental factors, occupational circumstances like trauma, hormonal effects (lack of protective estrogens) and genetic associations such as SOD-1 gene.
“ALS is common in males due to higher exposure to toxins, environmental factors, occupational circumstances like trauma, hormonal effects (lacks of protective estrogens) and genetic associations such as SOD-1 gene [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationOne possible biological explanation for an association between head trauma and ALS involves trauma-induced axonal injury and subsequent disruption of neuronal homeostasis.
“One possible biological explanation for an association between head trauma and ALS involves trauma-induced axonal injury and subsequent disruption of neuronal homeostasis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnder pathological conditions, TDP-43 can translocate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where it undergoes misfolding, hyperphosphorylation, ubiquitination, and aggregation.
“Under pathological conditions, TDP-43 can translocate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where it undergoes misfolding, hyperphosphorylation, ubiquitination, and aggregation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe finding that only one head injury was significantly associated with ALS could be attributed to the possibility of reverse causation.
“However, this could be attributed to the possibility of the reverse causation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis cumulative effect leads to chronic inflammation, activation of apoptotic mechanisms and disruption of cellular mechanisms which eventually cause toxic excitotoxicity via greater glutamate amounts release.
“This leads to chronic inflammation, activation of apoptotic mechanisms and disruption of cellular mechanisms which eventually causing toxic excitotoxicity via greater glutamate amounts release [25][26][27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationIn a New Zealand retrospective cohort of high-level rugby players, high-level rugby participation was associated with an increased risk of neurodegenerative disease (HR 1.22).
“High-level rugby participation was associated with increased neurodegenerative disease risk (HR 1.22), including Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.61) and MND (HR 1.16).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anns et al. 2025 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationALS was significantly associated with a history of surgical operations before service.
“ALS was significantly associated with a history of trauma and surgical operations before service.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kurtzke-Beebe et al. 1980
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationALS was significantly associated with a history of trauma before service.
“ALS was significantly associated with a history of trauma and surgical operations before service.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kurtzke-Beebe et al. 1980
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe systematic review used a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and registers only.
“PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and registers only”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationIn that New Zealand cohort, high-level rugby participation was associated with an increased risk of motor neuron disease (HR 1.16).
“High-level rugby participation was associated with increased neurodegenerative disease risk (HR 1.22), including Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.61) and MND (HR 1.16).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anns et al. 2025 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe initial odds ratio for ALS associated with hospital-diagnosed traumatic head injury was 1.3 but declined over time.
“The initial OR was 1.3 but declined over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levison et al. 2025 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
“Quality assessment of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningDespite pooling the risk ratio from four cohort studies and finding a positive association between head injury exposure and ALS, the evidence from cohort studies remains weak, heterogeneous and requires further investigation.
“Despite pooling the risk ratio from four cohort studies and found positive association between head injury exposure and ALS, the evidence from cohort studies remains weak, heterogenous and requires further investigation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis updated meta-analysis provides evidence that a history of head injury is associated with an increased risk of ALS, with consistent findings across multiple subgroup analyses and adjusted estimates.
“This updated meta-analysis provides evidence that a history of head injury is associated with an increased risk of ALS, with consistent findings across multiple subgroup analyses and adjusted estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHead trauma was a significant risk factor for ALS (multivariable OR 4.045).
“Head trauma was a significant risk factor for ALS (multivariable OR 4.045).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lian et al. 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataHead trauma was associated with increased ALS risk (adjusted OR 1.60), particularly for injuries occurring ≥10 years before onset.
“Head trauma was associated with increased ALS risk (adjusted OR 1.60), particularly for injuries occurring ≥10 years before onset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAlthough we found a significant association between head injury and ALS, our study showed limitations in determining the direction of the association.
“Although we found a significant association between head injury and ALS, our study showed limitations in determining the direction of the association.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningResults from cohort studies might be considered with caution because of the presence of heterogeneity among population, follow-up periods, ALS ascertainment methods, and head injury definition.
“And the results from cohort studies might be considered with caution because of the presence of heterogeneity among population, follow-up periods, ALS ascertainment methods, and Head injury definition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationThe standardized morbidity ratio for ALS following head trauma with presumed brain injury was 1.05 (95% CI 0.027-5.85).
“The standardized morbidity ratio for ALS was 1.05 (95% CI 0.027-5.85)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams et al. 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationVeterans with head injuries during the 15 years before the reference date had an adjusted OR of 2.33 for ALS.
“Veterans with head injuries during the 15 years before the reference date had an adjusted OR of 2.33.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Study design and conductreasoningGiven the observational nature of available evidence and the remaining possibility of reverse causation and residual confounding, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.
“However, given the observational nature of available evidence and the remaining possibility of reverse causation and residual confounding, these findings should be interpreted cautiously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHistory of head trauma was reported in 25% of ALS cases and 13% of controls.
“History of head trauma was reported in 25% of cases and 13% of controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mitsi et al. 2023 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationIn that New Zealand cohort, high-level rugby participation was associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.61).
“High-level rugby participation was associated with increased neurodegenerative disease risk (HR 1.22), including Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.61) and MND (HR 1.16).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anns et al. 2025 source
The paper relies on this without support.
Genetic susceptibility plays a central role in ALS pathogenesis.
“Also, genetic susceptibility plays a central role in ALS pathogenesis and head trauma may act principally in genetically vulnerable individuals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Head trauma may act principally in genetically vulnerable individuals.
“Also, genetic susceptibility plays a central role in ALS pathogenesis and head trauma may act principally in genetically vulnerable individuals.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Qureshi case count differs between study tables
MinorThe study-characteristics entry reports 96 cases, whereas Table 2 reports 95 ALS participants. Both give a total sample of 201.
“96/201 Factors affecting disease progression”
“Qureshi et al. 2006 ALS 95 54.4 (13.1)”
Savica football-player count differs between study tables
MinorOne study-characteristics entry reports 439 football players among 578 participants, while Table 2 reports 438 football players and 140 non-football participants.
“439/578 Comparison of neurodegenerative disease frequency”
“Savica et al. 2012 Football players 438 NR NR NR 438 (100) NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 10 (2.3) NR NR 13 (3.0)Non-football 140”
Cites
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 · Cited by 6,793 · see citing works
Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Manley, G. T., Abrams, M. B., Åkerlund, C. A. I., Anđelić, N., Aries, M. J. H., Bashford, T., Bell, M. J., Bodien, Y. G., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00309-x · Cited by 1,651 · see citing works
Documented head injury in early adulthood and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias
Plassman, B. L., Havlik, R. J., Steffens, D. C., Helms, M. J., Newman, T. N., Drosdick, D., Phillips, C., Gau, B. A., Welsh–Bohmer, K. A., Burke, J. R., et al. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.55.8.1158 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Molecular Mechanisms of TDP-43 Misfolding and Pathology in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Prasad, A., Bharathi, V., Sivalingam, V., Girdhar, A., & Patel, B. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2019.00025 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an update of recent literature
Longinetti, E., & Fang, F. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0000000000000730 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Effects of gender in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
McCombe, P. A., & Henderson, R. D. (2010) · Gender Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.genm.2010.11.010 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Understanding Acquired Brain Injury: A Review
Goldman, L. V., Siddiqui, E. M., Khan, A., Jahan, S., Rehman, M. U., Mehan, S., Sharma, R. K., Budkin, S., Kumar, S. N., Sahu, A., et al. (2022) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines10092167 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Clarke, M., Brice, A., & Chalmers, I. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102670 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Neurodegenerative disease risk among former international rugby union players
Russell, E., Mackay, D., Lyall, D. M., Stewart, K., MacLean, J. A., Robson, J., Pell, J. P., & Stewart, W. B., Jr. (2022) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-329675 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying TDP-43 Pathology in Cellular and Animal Models of ALS and FTLD
Wood, A., Gurfinkel, Y., Polain, N., Lamont, W. G., & Rea, S. L. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22094705 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Huber, B. R., Meabon, J. S., Hoffer, Z. S., Zhang, J., Hoekstra, J. G., Pagulayan, K. F., McMillan, P. J., Mayer, C. L., Banks, W. A., Kraemer, B. C., et al. (2016) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.01.022 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Traumatic axonal injury (TAI): definitions, pathophysiology and imaging—a narrative review
Bruggeman, G. F., Haitsma, I., Dirven, C. M. F., & Volovici, V. (2020) · Acta Neurochirurgica · doi:10.1007/s00701-020-04594-1 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Traumatic injury compromises nucleocytoplasmic transport and leads to TDP-43 pathology
Anderson, E. N., Morera, A. A., Kour, S., Cherry, J. D., Ramesh, N., Gleixner, A., Schwartz, J. C., Ebmeier, C., Old, W., Donnelly, C. J., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.67587 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Is head trauma a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? An evidence based review
Armon, C., & Nelson, L. M. (2012) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis · doi:10.3109/17482968.2012.660954 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Severe head injury and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Peters, T. L., Fang, F., Weibull, C. E., Sandler, D. P., Kamel, F., & Ye, W. (2013) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · doi:10.3109/21678421.2012.754043 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Tofersen for SOD1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hamad, A. A., Alkhawaldeh, I. M., Nashwan, A. J., Meshref, M. M., & Imam, Y. Z. B. (2025) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10072-025-07994-2 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationHead Injury and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis
Liu, G., Ou, S., Cui, H., Li, X., Yin, Z., Gu, D., & Wang, Z. (2021) · Neuroepidemiology · doi:10.1159/000510987 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Head injury, potential interaction with genes, and risk for Parkinson's disease
Gao, J., Liu, R., Zhao, E. J., Huang, X., Nalls, M. A., Singleton, A., & Chen, H. (2015) · Parkinsonism & Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.12.033 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Prevalence of Traumatic Brain Injury in the General Adult Population of the USA: A Meta-Analysis
Karamian, A., Lucke-Wold, B. P., & Seifi, A. (2024) · Neuroepidemiology · doi:10.1159/000540676 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Kaniuk, J. K., Kumar, D., Mazurek, C. Y., Khavari, S., Sollenberger, C. H., Ahuja, A., Mossner, J. M., & Ahuja, C. S. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26157191 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Chourpiliadis, C., Seitz, C., Lovik, A., Joyce, E. E., Pan, L., Hu, Y., Kläppe, U., Samuelsson, K., Press, R., Ingre, C., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-024-12496-w · Cited by 10 · see citing works
History of head trauma and the risk of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abouelmagd, M. E., AbdelMeseh, M., Hassan, A., Ali, M. A., Mohamed, R. G., Mady, A., Hindawi, M. D., & Meshref, M. M. (2024) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2024.106183 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationPathological Aging of Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Preliminary Longitudinal Study
Mohammadi, S., Ghaderi, S., Fatehi, F., Kalra, S., & Batouli, S. A. H. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70484 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Zhu, X., Russell, E., Lyall, D. M., Ho, F. K. W., Mackay, D., Pell, J. P., & Stewart, W. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35119 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Neurodegenerative Diseases in Male Former First-Class New Zealand Rugby Players
Anns, F., Quarrie, K. L., Milne, B. J., Li, C., Gardner, A. J., Murphy, I. R., Verhagen, E., Wright, C., Morton, S. M. B., Lumley, T., et al. (2026) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-025-02299-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hamad, A. A., Alkhawaldeh, I. M., Abbas, A., Elaraby, A. R., & Meshref, M. M. (2024) · La Tunisie Médicale · doi:10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5154 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationModelling Bimodal Data Using a Multivariate Triangular-Linked Distribution
de Waal, D., Harris, T., de Waal, A., & Mazarura, J. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10142370 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mitsi, E., Christodoulou, C. C., Nicolaou, P., Christodoulou, K., & Zamba-Papanicolaou, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1264743 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Levison, L., Jepsen, P., Blicher, J. U., & Andersen, H. (2025) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000213809 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Helal, M. M., Almosilhy, N. A., Abo‐elnour, D. E., Jaffal, R., Allam, E. G., Almosilhy, M. A., Batarseh, S. F., & Meshref, M. M. (2026) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · doi:10.1080/21678421.2026.2627901 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationMartinez-Nunez, A. E., Guo, J., Dorsey, E. R., Ruffing, K. W., Wymer, J., & Okun, M. S. (2026) · BMJ Neurology Open · doi:10.1136/bmjno-2026-001574 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Cherry N (2002) Environmental health and social factors associated with motor neurone disease. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health 26:574
- Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
- Giza CC, Hovda DA (2001) The Neurometabolic Cascade of Concussion. Journal of athletic training 36:228- 235
- Chourpiliadis C, Seitz C, Lovik A, et al (2024) Lifestyle and medical conditions in relation to ALS risk and progression-an introduction to the Swedish ALSrisc Study. Journal of Neurology 271:5447-5459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12496-w · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Hawas, Y., Abdelmageed, A., Messak, M., Ziada, A., Gamal, M., Ghanem, T. I. E., Abdelwahab, M. M., Meshref, M., & Kashbour, M. O.
- Corresponding author
- Kashbour, Muataz Omar
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuroepidemiology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2026-10-12
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 0251-5350 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0208
- OpenAlex
- W7221572992
- Semantic Scholar
- 8010444db66e1fadea85e4347aab6e4b5f646383
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neuroepidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS risk factors, injury severity, injury frequency, injury timing, modifiable risk factors, reverse causality, residual confounding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review