PreprintCited by 16Mental Health Research TopicsDigital Mental Health InterventionsEmotion and Mood Recognition

A control theoretic approach to evaluate and inform ecological momentary interventions

Open access
Fechtelpeter, Janik, Rauschenberg, Christian, Jamalabadi, Hamidreza, Boecking, Benjamin, van Amelsvoort, Therese, Reininghaus, Ulrich, Durstewitz, Daniel, Koppe, Georgia·2023·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Objectives. Ecological momentary interventions (EMI) are digital mobile health interventions administered in an individual's daily life to improve mental health by tailoring intervention components to person and context. Experience sampling via ecological momentary assessments (EMA) furthermore provides dynamic contextual information on an individual’s mental health state. We propose a personalized data-driven generic framework to select and evaluate EMI based on EMA. Methods. We analyze EMA/EMI time-series from 10 individuals, published in a previous study. The EMA consist of multivariate psychological Likert scales. The EMI are mental health trainings presented on a smartphone. We model EMA as linear dynamical systems (DS) and EMI as perturbations. Using concepts from network control theory, we propose and evaluate three personalized data-driven intervention delivery strategies. Moreover, we study putative change mechanisms in response to interventions.Results. We identify promising intervention delivery strategies that outperform empirical strategies in simulation. We pinpoint interventions with a high positive impact on the network, at low energetic costs. Although mechanisms differ between individuals - demanding personalized solutions - the proposed strategies are generic and applicable to various real-world settings.Conclusions. Combined with knowledge from mental health experts, DS and control algorithms may provide powerful data-driven and personalized intervention delivery and evaluation strategies.Keywords: ecological momentary assessment, ecological momentary intervention, mobile health, control theory, computational psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/97teh

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Support for the applicability of process-based therapy has been reported from single-case studies.

    “Support for its applicability has been reported from a single-case studies.”

    From Process-based therapy vs. routine-CBT for difficult-to-treat mood and anxiety disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction describes a proof-of-concept application of network control theory to ecological momentary interventions, and the Conclusion discusses personalized intervention delivery. Neither passage reports single-case studies supporting the applicability of process-based therapy; searches for that term and for single-case applicability found no such passage in our copy. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fechtelpeter, J., Rauschenberg, C., Jamalabadi, H., Boecking, B., van Amelsvoort, T., Reininghaus, U., Durstewitz, D., & Koppe, G.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fechtelpeter, Janik
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Published
2023-05-17
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
e70001-e70001
ISSN
1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403635208
Cited by
16
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (945263, HORIZON2020)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR 265, TRR‐265 (project A06), 389624707)
  • Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg (31-7547.223-7/3/2)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (945263)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
ecological momentary intervention, ecological momentary assessment, mobile health, mental health, network control theory, linear dynamical systems, intervention evaluation, smartphone-based training, mechanisms of change
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review