Cited by 34Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPsychosocial Factors Impacting YouthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Parentification, Ethnic Identity, and Psychological Health in Black and White American College Students: Implications of Family-of-Origin and Cultural Factors

Hooper, Lisa M, Wallace, Scyatta A, Doehler, Kirsten, Dantzler, John·2012·Journal of Comparative Family Studies

Abstract

The authors examined the predictive ability of parentification (i.e., when parental roles and responsibilities are abdicated by parents and carried out by children and adolescents) and ethnic identity on various psychological health factors in college students. Scores from five measures were used to test a conceptual two-factor model in which parentification and ethnic identity predict psychological health; participants were 157 Black Americans and 157 White Americans attending a large public southern university. The measures included the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (Babor, Higgins-Biddle, Saunders, and Monteiro, 2001), the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck, Steer, and Brown, 1996), the Eating Attitudes Test (Gamer, Olmsted, Bohr, and Garfinkel, 1982), the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (Phinney, 1992), and the Parentification Inventory (Hooper, 2009). No evidence of a significant difference in mean parentification scores between Black American and White American college student participants was found. However, results from differential item function analyses on individual Parentification Inventory items uncovered some significant differences between the two groups. Results from bivariate correlations uncovered slight differences in the significant associations between predictor variables and outcome variables. In addition, multivariate regression analyses revealed slight differences in study variables’ ability to predict psychological health. Parentification and ethnic identity explained some of the variability in depressive symptoms in both samples. Additionally, parentification and ethnic identity explained some of the variability in disordered eating symptoms in the Black American sample but not in the White American sample. Implications for culturally tailored practice and directions for future culturally focused research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/jcfs.43.6.811

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hooper, L. M., Wallace, S. A., Doehler, K., & Dantzler, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • St. John's University (US)
  • Elon University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Family Studies
Published
2012-11-01
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
811-835
ISSN
  • 0047-2328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1929-9850
OpenAlex
W2594987307
Cited by
34
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Comparative Family Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
parentification, ethnic identity, mental health, depressive symptoms, disordered eating, family of origin, cultural factors, differential item functioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review