Cited by 1,147Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Identity and Representation

When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean?

Phinney, Jean S.·1996·American Psychologist

Abstract

American ethnic groups are often thought of as discrete categories to which people belong and that explain some aspects of psychological functioning. However, ethnicity is a complex multidimensional construct that, by itself, explains little. To understand its psychological implications, it is necessary to identify and assess those aspects of ethnicity that may have an impact on outcomes of interest. In this article, the author examines 3 key aspects of ethnicity: cultural norms and values, the strength, salience, and meaning of ethnic identity, and the experiences and attitudes associated with minority status. These aspects are best understood in terms of dimensions along which individuals and samples vary, rather than as categories into which individuals can be classified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.51.9.918

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on the long history of white supremacy shaping U.S. society, as well as the writings of early ERI scholars, white pride cannot carry the same meaning as Black or Latinx pride, and a sense of belonging to whiteness does not signify positive ethnic group belonging.

    “Based on the long history of white supremacy shaping U.S. society, as well as the writings of early ERI scholars (Phinney, 1996; Sellers, 1993), the answer to these questions is clearly “no.””
  • Berry's taxonomy supports the argument that acculturation is not a linear process but a multidimensional process that includes one's orientation to both one's ethnic culture and the larger society.

    “Berry's taxonomy supports the argument that ''acculturation is not a linear process, with individuals ranging from unacculturated to assimilated, but rather a multidimensional process that includes one's orientation to both one's ethnic culture and the larger society'' (Phinney, 1996, p. 922).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phinney, J. S.
Affiliations
California State University Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Phinney, Jean S.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1996-09
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
918-927
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W1963947469
Cited by
1,147
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 55
FWCI
113.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
Keywords
ethnicity, ethnic identity, cultural values and norms, minority status, ethnic identity salience, ethnic classification, multidimensional construct, American ethnic groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review