Cited by 16Quality and Supply ManagementSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementWorking Capital and Financial Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interdependence Among Inventory Types and Firm Performance

Open access
Manikas, Andrew S.·2017·Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Extant research on lean manufacturing has focused on the relationship between systemic inventory and performance.However, limited research, if any, has focused on dynamics between three main types of inventory -raw material, workin-process, and finished goods -and firm performance.Drawing on the interdependence framework and a sample of 1,286 firms representing 41,067 firm-quarter observations from 2000 to 2013, when considering two types of inventory efficiencies jointly, higher efficiency in the subsequent inventory type must be accompanied by lower efficiency in the previous inventory type.In other words, lower raw material inventory efficiency and higher work-in-process inventory efficiency, or lower work-in-process inventory efficiency and higher finished goods inventory efficiency are associated with higher performance.High performance is also realized only when inventory efficiency is increasing across all three inventory types.The findings show that pursuing efficiency in one type of inventory requires lower efficiency in the previous inventory stage, and benefits of lean manufacturing could only be realized when all three inventory efficiencies are simultaneously high.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31387/oscm0270181

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Babatunde, B. O., and Arogundade, K. K. (2011). Reflection of inventory-production cost minimisation and organisation's profit performance.The Journal of Commerce3(4), pp. 39- 44.
  2. Balakrishnan, R., Linsmeier, T. J., and Venkatachalam, M. (1996). Financial benefits from JIT adoption: Effects of customer concentration and cost structure.The Accounting Review 71(2), pp. 183-205.

Metadata

Authors
Manikas, A. S.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Manikas, Andrew S.
Venue
Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
Publisher
OSCM Forum
Published
2017-03-17
Pages
63-80
ISSN
2579-9363 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883874874
Cited by
16
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Operations and Supply Chain Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Working Capital and Financial Performance
Keywords
lean manufacturing, inventory efficiency, raw material inventory, work-in-process inventory, finished goods inventory, firm performance, inventory management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review