Cited by 14Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AI

IBchain: Internet of Things and Blockchain Integration Approach for Secure Communication in Smart Cities

Open access
Alam, Tanweer·2021·Informatica

Abstract

Introducing IBchain, a new blockchain architecture with the Internet of Things (IoT) could be an attractive framework regarding improvements in connectivity implementation through the smart cities. Instead of meriting innovation and security, the IoT links people, sites, products and consequently, also provides opportunities. Everything that transfers information to the IoT system is integrated by advanced microchips, sensors, and actuators in actual things. The analytical ability of the IoT converts observations into actions, impacting business advancements and significant ways of activity. IoT enables connected objects to transmit information to personal blockchain systems to create tamper-resistant transaction records. The information from sensors and microchips is progressing rapidly with blockchain ledgers, making them more portable and relevant for immediate conversations. In IBchain methodology, the smart objects are permissible to connect securely with other smart objects in diverse situations. IBchain creates an innovative blockchain-based processing configuration through the IoT. The IBchain could analyze blockchain to the main expertise or supports the IoT validation and trustworthiness. It reinforces blockchain and cloud to build an empowering IoT ubiquitous situation for secure communication among the smart devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31449/inf.v45i3.3573

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • City resources are scheduled efficiently for the city's infrastructure using smart contracts.

    “Accordingly, city resources are scheduled efficiently for the city's infrastructure [65].”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [65]

    Section 4 mentions automated scheduling as a potential smart-city benefit, and Section 4.2 says blockchain may improve the efficiency of city-level asset and budget management. Neither passage says that smart contracts efficiently schedule city resources for infrastructure; Section 4.2 discusses smart contracts separately as agreements that can be concluded autonomously. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Banafa, Ahmed. "IoT and blockchain convergence: benefits and challenges." IEEE Internet of Things (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alam, T.
Affiliations
Islamic University of Madinah (SA)
Corresponding author
Alam, Tanweer
Venue
Informatica
Published
2021-09-15
Volume
45
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0350-5596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1854-3871
OpenAlex
W3208010034
Cited by
14
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Informatica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Informatica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
Internet of Things, blockchain, smart cities, secure communication, blockchain architecture, Internet of Things security, smart objects, trustworthiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review