Cited by 769Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningInternet of Things and AI

Blockchain for the Internet of Things: A systematic literature review

Open access
Conoscenti, Marco, Vetro, Antonio, De Martin, Juan Carlos·2016·2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA)

Abstract

In the Internet of Things (IoT) scenario, the block-chain and, in general, Peer-to-Peer approaches could play an important role in the development of decentralized and dataintensive applications running on billion of devices, preserving the privacy of the users. Our research goal is to understand whether the blockchain and Peer-to-Peer approaches can be employed to foster a decentralized and private-by-design IoT. As a first step in our research process, we conducted a Systematic Literature Review on the blockchain to gather knowledge on the current uses of this technology and to document its current degree of integrity, anonymity and adaptability. We found 18 use cases of blockchain in the literature. Four of these use cases are explicitly designed for IoT. We also found some use cases that are designed for a private-by-design data management. We also found several issues in the integrity, anonymity and adaptability. Regarding anonymity, we found that in the blockchain only pseudonymity is guaranteed. Regarding adaptability and integrity, we discovered that the integrity of the blockchain largely depends on the high difficulty of the Proof-of-Work and on the large number of honest miners, but at the same time a difficult Proof-of-Work limits the adaptability. We documented and categorized the current uses of the blockchain, and provided a few recommendations for future work to address the above-mentioned issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/aiccsa.2016.7945805

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. G. Ateniese, M. T. Goodrich, V. Lekakis, C. Papamanthou, E. Paraskevas, and R. Tamassia, "Accountable Storage," IACR Cryp- tology ePrint Archive, vol. 2014, p. 886, 2014.
  2. J. Herbert and A. Litchfield, "A Novel Method for Decentralised Peer- to-Peer Software License Validation Using Cryptocurrency Blockchain Technology," in ACSC, ser. CRPIT, vol. 159. Australian Computer Society, 2015, pp. 27-35.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conoscenti, M., Vetro, A., & De Martin, J. C.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Venue
2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-11
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2624953603
Cited by
769
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 155 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 10
FWCI
26.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
blockchain, Internet of Things, peer-to-peer, decentralized applications, privacy, pseudonymity, data integrity, proof-of-work, blockchain use cases, data management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review