Cited by 47Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

The ensiling capability of a mixture of sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite

Open access
Knicky, M., Spörndly, R.·2011·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an additive comprising sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite on the quality of silages fermented from various forage crops. Thirteen crops in 3 groups (differing in dry matter concentration and degree of ensilability) were treated with the additive mixture and compared with untreated control silages. The main focus was on yeast and Clostridia spp. activity in the silages, although other silage quality criteria also were measured. Treated silages from difficult-to-ensile crops at low dry matter were found to have significantly lower silage pH, fewer clostridial spores, and reduced concentrations of ammonia N, butyric acid, and ethanol. In addition, dry matter losses were reduced in treated silages compared with those receiving no additive. Similar results were observed in silages from easy or intermediate ensilable crops when the dry matter concentration was <300 g/kg. When the dry matter concentration was >350 g/kg, the treated silages contained less ammonia N, ethanol, and yeast for 3 out of 4 forages. All treated silages from all crops were aerobically stable during the examination time. The application of the tested additive mixture reduced the growth of undesirable microflora and thereby reduced silage losses and prolonged the aerobic stability of the silages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2010-3364

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kwella, M., K. Haaker, and B. Reuter. 1993. About investigations on the efficiency of silage additives. Pages 99-100 in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Silage Research. Dublin City Univ., Ireland.
  2. Reuter, B., and F. Weissbach. 1991. Results of testing chemical preser- vatives. Pages 338-341 in Proc. of a Conf. on Forage Conservation towards 2000. G. Pahlow and H. Honig, ed. Institute of Grass- land and Forage Research, Federal Research Center of Agriculture (FAL), Braunschweig, Germany.
  3. Weissbach, F. 1996. New developments in crop conservation. Pages 11-25 in Proc. of the 11th Int. Silage Conference. D. I. H. Jones, R. Dewhurst, R. Merry, and P. M. Haigh. ed. IGER Publ. Section, Aberystwyth, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knicky, M., & Spörndly, R.
Affiliations
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
Spörndly, R.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2011-02
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
824-831
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983319642
Cited by
47
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
silage additives, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, sodium nitrite, silage fermentation, dry matter content, yeast activity, Clostridium, silage pH, ammonia nitrogen, butyrate, ethanol, aerobic stability, dry matter loss, silage quality
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Clostridium, Fermentation, Food Additives, Food Contamination, Silage, Sodium Nitrite, Sorbic Acid, Yeasts, Sodium Benzoate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review