Cited by 51Microbial infections and disease researchAnimal health and immunologyAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology

Scoping Review on Clinical Definition of Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex and Related Clinical Signs in Dairy Cows

Open access
Ferraro, Salvatore, Fecteau, Gilles, Dubuc, Jocelyn, Francoz, David, Rousseau, Marjolaine, Roy, Jean-Philippe, Buczinski, Sébastien·2021·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRD) is a worldwide multifactorial infectious disease. Antimicrobials are commonly used for treating BRD because bacteria are often involved. The clinical diagnosis of BRD is a challenge, especially in adult dairy cows, where information on this syndrome is scant. Having a definition based on consistent and reliable clinical signs would improve the accuracy of BRD diagnosis and could help to develop an optimal treatment approach by an early detection. The aim of this scoping review was to review clinical signs that could be recognized by producers in dairy cattle suffering from naturally occurring infectious respiratory disease, as reported in the literature. A review of the literature was performed for articles published between January 1, 1990 and January 1, 2020. The search of literature in English, French, and Italian languages included 2 different databases (Pubmed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; CAB abstract, https://www.cabi.org/publishing-products/cab-abstracts/). Clinical signs were categorized as follows: (1) "general manifestations of disease," which included behavioral changes or fever; (2) "alterations in respiratory function," which included clinical signs specifically associated with the respiratory tract examination; and (3) "clinical signs of other body systems," which included clinical signs related to other systems such as diarrhea or subcutaneous emphysema. The focus of the review was on clinical signs that could be monitored by animal handlers and producers. A total of 1,067 titles were screened, and 23 studies were finally included. The most common general clinical signs were increased body temperature (reported in 83% of studies, n = 19), change in feed intake (26%, n = 6), altered mentation (22%, n = 5), and decreased milk production (17%, n = 4). The alterations in respiratory function noted were nasal discharge (74%, n = 17), cough (65%, n = 15), altered respiratory dynamic or dyspnea (61%, n = 14), increased respiratory rate (43%, n = 10), and ocular discharge or lacrimation (30%, n = 7). The clinical signs associated with infectious respiratory disease reported in the 23 studies generally lacked a clear description of what constitutes a deviation from normality (0-50% of studies clearly reported what was considered normal versus abnormal depending on the clinical signs). This limitation prevented any comparison between studies that apparently reported the same "clinical sign," but possibly referred to a different assessment and definition of what was considered normal versus abnormal. Therefore, the definition of clinical signs in a repeatable way with validated interobserver agreement to determine the optimal combination for the diagnosis of BRD in dairy cows is needed. This could lead to a more judicious use of antimicrobials for respiratory disease in adult dairy cows.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2020-19471

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]14. Dobbins, M. 2017. Rapid Review Guidebook. Details National Col- laborating Centre for Methods and Tools.
  2. [37]37. Lardé, H. 2019. Utilisation des antibiotiques dans les fermes laitières québécoises: résultats préliminaires d'enquête. in Proc. Congrès Vétérinaire Québécois, Centre de congrès de Saint-Hyacinthe.
  3. [41]41. M. o. A., Fisheries and Food, Quebec). 2018. Règlement modifiant le Règlement sur l'administration de certains médica- ments. Pages 6427-6428. Vol. Décret 1110-2018, 15 août 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferraro, S., Fecteau, G., Dubuc, J., Francoz, D., Rousseau, M., Roy, J.-P., & Buczinski, S.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Buczinski, Sébastien
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2021-06
Volume
104
Issue
6
Pages
7095-7108
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136965238
Cited by
51
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Keywords
bovine respiratory disease, dairy cattle, clinical signs, diagnosis, fever, rhinorrhea, cough, dyspnea, feed intake, milk production, subcutaneous emphysema, ocular discharge, altered mental status, early detection, cattle health management, antimicrobial therapy, bacterial respiratory infections
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Temperature, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Diarrhea, Female, Fever, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review