Cited by 279Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Combining MR Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography, and CSF Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer Disease

Open access
Walhovd, K.B., Fjell, A.M., Brewer, J., McEvoy, L.K., Fennema-Notestine, C., Hagler, D.J., Jennings, R.G., Karow, D. +2 more·2010·American Journal of Neuroradiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different biomarkers for AD may potentially be complementary in diagnosis and prognosis of AD. Our aim was to combine MR imaging, FDG-PET, and CSF biomarkers in the diagnostic classification and 2-year prognosis of MCI and AD, by examining the following: 1) which measures are most sensitive to diagnostic status, 2) to what extent the methods provide unique information in diagnostic classification, and 3) which measures are most predictive of clinical decline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ADNI baseline MR imaging, FDG-PET, and CSF data from 42 controls, 73 patients with MCI, and 38 patients with AD; and 2-year clinical follow-up data for 36 controls, 51 patients with MCI, and 25 patients with AD were analyzed. The hippocampus and entorhinal, parahippocampal, retrosplenial, precuneus, inferior parietal, supramarginal, middle temporal, lateral, and medial orbitofrontal cortices were used as regions of interest. CSF variables included Abeta42, t-tau, p-tau, and ratios of t-tau/Abeta42 and p-tau/Abeta42. Regression analyses were performed to determine the sensitivity of measures to diagnostic status as well as 2-year change in CDR-SB, MMSE, and delayed logical memory in MCI. RESULTS: Hippocampal volume, retrosplenial thickness, and t-tau/Abeta42 uniquely predicted diagnostic group. Change in CDR-SB was best predicted by retrosplenial thickness; MMSE, by retrosplenial metabolism and thickness; and delayed logical memory, by hippocampal volume. CONCLUSIONS: All biomarkers were sensitive to the diagnostic group. Combining MR imaging morphometry and CSF biomarkers improved diagnostic classification (controls versus AD). MR imaging morphometry and PET were largely overlapping in value for discrimination. Baseline MR imaging and PET measures were more predictive of clinical change in MCI than were CSF measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3174/ajnr.a1809

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. [1]Mosconi L Brys M Glodzik-Sobanska L De Santi S Rusinek H de Leon MJ Early detection of Alzheimer's disease using neuroimaging Exp Gerontol 2007 42 129 138 16839732
  2. [2]Craig-Schapiro R Fagan AM Holtzman DM Biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease Neurobiol Dis 2008 PMC2747727 19010417
  3. [3]Blennow K Wallin A Agren H Spenger C Siegfried J Vanmechelen E Tau protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a biochemical marker for axonal degeneration in Alzheimer disease? Mol Chem Neuropathol 1995 26 231 245 8748926
  4. [4]Andreasen N Blennow K Beta-amyloid (Abeta) protein in cerebrospinal fluid as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease Peptides 2002 23 1205 1214 12128078
  5. [6]Leow AD Yanovsky I Parikshak N Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative: a one-year follow up study using tensor-based morphometry correlating degenerative rates, biomarkers and cognition Neuroimage 2009 45 645 655 19280686 PMC2696624
  6. [7]McEvoy LK Fennema-Notestine C Roddey JC Alzheimer disease: quantitative structural neuroimaging for detection and prediction of clinical and structural changes in mild cognitive impairment Radiology 2009 251 195 205 19201945 PMC2663582
  7. [8]Misra C Fan Y Davatzikos C Baseline and longitudinal patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, and their use in prediction of short-term conversion to AD: results from ADNI Neuroimage 2009 44 1415 1422 19027862 PMC2648825
  8. [9]Mosconi L Tsui WH Herholz K Multicenter standardized 18F-FDG PET diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and other dementias J Nucl Med 2008 49 390 398 18287270 PMC3703818
  9. [10]de Leon MJ Ferris SH George AE Computed tomography and positron emission transaxial tomography evaluations of normal aging and Alzheimer's disease J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983 3 391 394 6603463
  10. [11]Langbaum JBS Chen K Lee W Categroical and correlational analyses of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Neuroimage 2009 In press PMC2886795 19349228
  11. [12]De Santi S de Leon MJ Rusinek H Hippocampal formation glucose metabolism and volume losses in MCI and AD Neurobiol Aging 2001 22 529 539 11445252
  12. [13]Mosconi L Sorbi S de Leon MJ Hypometabolism exceeds atrophy in presymptomatic early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease J Nucl Med 2006 47 1778 1786 17079810
  13. [14]Jagust WJ Eberling JL Wu CC Brain function and cognition in a community sample of elderly Latinos Neurology 2002 59 378 383 12177371
  14. [15]Wu CC Mungas D Petkov CI Brain structure and cognition in a community sample of elderly Latinos Neurology 2002 59 383 391 12177372
  15. [16]Walhovd KB Fjell AM Dale AM Multi-modal imaging predicts memory performance in normal aging and cognitive decline Neurobiol Aging 2009 In press PMC3947581 18838195
  16. [17]de Leon MJ Mosconi L Blennow K Imaging and CSF studies in the preclinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007 1097 114 145 17413016
  17. [18]de Leon MJ DeSanti S Zinkowski R Longitudinal CSF and MRI biomarkers improve the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment Neurobiol Aging 2006 27 394 401 16125823
  18. [19]Chou YY Lepore N Avedissian C Mapping correlations between ventricular expansion and CSF amyloid and tau biomarkers in 240 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment & elderly controls Neuroimage 2009 PMC2696357 19236926
  19. [20]Leow AD Yanovsky I Parikshak N Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A one-year follow up study using tensor-based morphometry correlating degenerative rates, biomarkers and cognition Neuroimage 2009 In press PMC2696624 19280686
  20. [21]Schuff N Woerner N Boreta L MRI of hippocampal volume loss in early Alzheimer's disease in relation to ApoE genotype and biomarkers Brain 2009 PMC2668943 19251758
  21. [22]Fjell AM Walhovd KB Amlien I Morphometric Changes in the Episodic Memory Network and Tau Pathologic Features Correlate With Memory Performance in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment American Journal of Neuroradiology 2008 29 1 7 18544670 PMC8118812
  22. [23]Folstein MF Folstein SE McHugh PR “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician J Psychiatr Res 1975 12 189 198 1202204
  23. [24]Jovicich J Czanner S Greve D Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data Neuroimage 2006 30 436 443 16300968
  24. [25]Sled JG Zijdenbos AP Evans AC A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998 17 87 97 9617910
  25. [27]Makris N Meyer JW Bates JF Yeterian EH Kennedy DN Caviness VS MRI-Based topographic parcellation of human cerebral white matter and nuclei II. Rationale and applications with systematics of cerebral connectivity Neuroimage 1999 9 18 45 9918726
  26. [28]Fischl B van der Kouwe A Destrieux C Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex Cereb Cortex 2004 14 11 22 14654453
  27. [29]Dale AM Sereno MI Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993 5 162 176 23972151
  28. [30]Dale AM Fischl B Sereno MI Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction Neuroimage 1999 9 179 194 9931268
  29. [31]Fischl B Dale AM Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000 97 11050 11055 10984517 PMC27146
  30. [32]Fischl B Sereno MI Dale AM Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system Neuroimage 1999 9 195 207 9931269
  31. [33]Fischl B Sereno MI Tootell RB Dale AM High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface Hum Brain Mapp 1999 8 272 284 10619420 PMC6873338
  32. [34]Salat DH Buckner RL Snyder AZ Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging Cereb Cortex 2004 14 721 730 15054051
  33. [35]Rosas HD Liu AK Hersch S Regional and progressive thinning of the cortical ribbon in Huntington's disease Neurology 2002 58 695 701 11889230
  34. [36]Kuperberg GR Broome MR McGuire PK Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003 60 878 888 12963669
  35. [38]Walhovd KB Fjell AM Amlien I Multimodal imaging in mild cognitive impairment: Metabolism, morphometry and diffusion of the temporal-parietal memory network Neuroimage 2009 45 215 223 19056499
  36. [42]Karas G Sluimer J Goekoop R Amnestic mild cognitive impairment: structural MR imaging findings predictive of conversion to Alzheimer disease AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008 29 944 949 18296551 PMC8128586
  37. [43]Devanand DP Habeck CG Tabert MH PET network abnormalities and cognitive decline in patients with mild cognitive impairment Neuropsychopharmacology 2006 31 1327 1334 16292330
  38. [45]Shaw LM Korecka M Clark CM Lee VM-Y Trojanowski JQ Biomarkers of neurodegeneration for diagnosis and monitoring therapeutics Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2007 6 295 303 17347655
  39. [46]Morris JC The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules Neurology 1993 43 2412 2414 8232972
  40. [48]Hanley JA McNeil BJ A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases Radiology 1983 148 839 843 6878708
  41. [49]Hansson O Zetterberg H Buchhave P Londos E Blennow K Minthon L Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study Lancet Neurol 2006 5 228 234 16488378
  42. [50]Hansson O Buchhave P Zetterberg H Blennow K Minthon L Warkentin S Combined rCBF and CSF biomarkers predict progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease Neurobiol Aging 2009 30 165 173 17646035
  43. [51]Sluimer JD Bouwman FH Vrenken H Whole-brain atrophy rate and CSF biomarker levels in MCI and AD: A longitudinal study Neurobiol Aging 2008 18692273

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walhovd, K. B., Fjell, A. M., Brewer, J., McEvoy, L. K., Fennema-Notestine, C., Hagler, D. J., Jennings, R. G., Karow, D., Dale, A. M., & Initiative, T. A. D. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2010-01-14
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
347-354
ISSN
  • 0195-6108 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-959X
OpenAlex
W2078563723
Cited by
279
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 18
FWCI
26.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (U01AG024904, AG024904)
  • Alzheimer's Association (U01 AG024904)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • Eli Lilly and Company (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • Pfizer (AG024904, U01 AG024904)
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • Northern California Institute for Research and Education (U01 AG024904)
  • Elan (U01 AG024904)
  • Eisai (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10, U01-AG024904, AG024904)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, R01AG22381, R01AG031224, AG 024904, R01AG022381, K01AG029218, U19AG010483)
  • National Center for Research Resources (R01AG22381, U24RR021382, U01 AG024904)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, FDG-PET, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, hippocampal volume, retrosplenial cortex, diagnostic classification, multimodal biomarker integration, neuroimaging biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Logistic Models, Databases, Factual, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review