Cited by 3Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesHistorical and Archaeological Studies

In search of Estonia’s earliest chicken

Open access
Ehrlich, Freydis, Rannamäe, Eve, Laneman, Margot, Tõrv, Mari, Lang, Valter, Oras, Ester, Lõugas, Lembi·2021·Estonian Journal of Archaeology

Abstract

It has been hypothesised that the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) was introduced to the area of what is now modern-day Estonia around the Pre-Roman or Roman Iron Age. However, none of the earliest chicken bones found in the area had been radiocarbon dated and due to a complex contextual background, the question of its first appearance has been left open. With the aim of finding the earliest evidence for the chicken in Estonia, we looked into the zooarchaeological material from twelve archaeological sites, including burial grounds, settlement sites, and hillforts. The earliest evidence had been reported at four of these sites, but during the taxonomic reassessment, no chicken bones were identified. From the remaining eight sites, nine chicken bones were radiocarbon dated by AMS. The sample from a stone-cist grave at Rebala (northern Estonia) was dated to 200 calBCE – 5 calCE, which means that this individual is the earliest confirmed chicken in Estonia. The other dates range from the Pre-Viking Age to the Modern Period, with some of them illustrating the complicated nature of faunal remains in archaeological contexts. Although this study elucidates the first appearance of the chicken in Estonia and in the Baltic region in general, its origin, ways of exploitation, and the extent of its spreading remain to be studied.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3176/arch.2021.2.04

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The chicken's first appearance in the eastern Baltic region dates to the late Pre-Roman Iron Age, where these remains may have been associated with a burial.

    “The chicken’s first appearance in the eastern Baltic region dates to the late Pre-Roman Iron Age, where these remains may have been associated with a burial (77).”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Galimova, D. N., Askeyev, I. V. & Askeyev, O. V. 2014. Bird remains from 5th-17th century AD archaeological sites in the Middle Volga region of Russia. -International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 24: 3, 347-357.
  2. Kysely, R. 2010. Review of the oldest evidence of domestic fowl Gallus gallus f. domestica from the Czech Republic in its European context. -Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 53A: 1-2, 9-34.
  3. Lang, V. 2018. Läänemeresoome tulemised. (MT, 28.) University of Tartu Press, Tartu.
  4. Eds M. A. Brisbane, N. A. Makarov & E. N. Nosov. Oxbow Books, Oxford, 351-380.
  5. Mannermaa, K. & Lõugas, L. 2005. Birds in the subsistence and cultures on four major Baltic Sea islands in the Neolithic (Hiiumaa, Saaremaa, Gotland and Åland). -Feathers, Grit and Symbolism. Birds and Humans in the Ancient Old and New Worlds: Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the ICAZ Bird Working Group in Munich 26.7-28.7.2004. Eds G. Grupe & J. Peters. (Documenta Archaeobiologiae, 3.) Verlag Marie Leidorf, Rahden, 179-198.
  6. Serjeantson, D. 2009. Birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi.
  7. Shaymuratova (Galimova), D., Askeyev, I. & Askeyev, O. 2019. The studies of archaeological bird remains from Medieval Staraya Ladoga. New results and interpretations. -Monographs of the Archaeological Society of Finland. Helsinki Harvest. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on the Application of Scientific Methods in Archaeology. Eds K. Mannermaa, M. A. Manninen, P. A. P. Pesonen & L. Seppänen. Suomen Arkeologinen Seura, Helsinki, 93-114.
  8. Tomek, T., Bocheński, Z. & Lõugas, L. 2010. The utilization of birds during the Late Bronze Age on the Baltic Sea island of Saaremaa, Estonia. -Poster Presentation. Abstract: 11th International Conference of Archaeozoology. ICAZ 2010. Paris, 23-28 August 2010, 234.
  9. Wessman, A., Alenius, T., Holmqvist, E., Mannermaa, K., Perttola, W., Sundell, T. & Vanhanen, S. 2018. Hidden and remote: new perspectives on the people in the Levänluhta water burial, western Finland (c. AD 300-800). -European Journal of Archaeology, 21: 3, 431-454.
  10. Xiang, H., Gao, J., Yu, B., Hofreiter, M. & Zhao, X. 2015. Reply to Peters et al.: Further discussions confirm early Holocene chicken domestication in northern China. -Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112: 19, E2416.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehrlich, F., Rannamäe, E., Laneman, M., Tõrv, M., Lang, V., Oras, E., & Lõugas, L.
Affiliations
Tallinn University (EE)
Venue
Estonian Journal of Archaeology
Published
2021-09-30
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
160-181
ISSN
1406-2933 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3204024558
Cited by
3
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Estonian Journal of Archaeology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia
  • Eesti Teadusagentuur (MOBERC14, PRG29, PSG492)
  • Tartu Ülikool
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Archaeological Studies
Keywords
chickens, domestication, animal introduction, Estonia, radiocarbon dating, zooarchaeology, faunal remains, stone cist graves, pre-Roman Iron Age, Roman Iron Age, Baltic Sea region, animal exploitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review