Cited by 352Plant and soil sciencesWater and Land ManagementSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

The Imperative for Regenerative Agriculture

Open access
Rhodes, Christopher J.·2017·Science Progress

Abstract

A review is made of the current state of agriculture, emphasising issues of soil erosion and dependence on fossil fuels, in regard to achieving food security for a relentlessly enlarging global population. Soil has been described as “the fragile, living skin of the Earth”, and yet both its aliveness and fragility have all too often been ignored in the expansion of agriculture across the face of the globe. Since it is a pivotal component in a global nexus of soil-water-air-energy, how we treat the soil can impact massively on climate change – with either beneficial or detrimental consequences, depending on whether the soil is preserved or degraded. Regenerative agriculture has at its core the intention to improve the health of soil or to restore highly degraded soil, which symbiotically enhances the quality of water, vegetation and land-productivity. By using methods of regenerative agriculture, it is possible not only to increase the amount of soil organic carbon (SOC) in existing soils, but to build new soil. This has the effect of drawing down carbon from the atmosphere, while simultaneously improving soil structure and soil health, soil fertility and crop yields, water retention and aquifer recharge – thus ameliorating both flooding and drought, and also the erosion of further soil, since runoff is reduced. Since food production on a more local scale is found to preserve the soil and its quality, urban food production should be seen as a significant potential contributor to regenerative agriculture in the future, so long as the methods employed are themselves ‘regenerative’. If localisation is to become a dominant strategy for dealing with a vastly reduced use of fossil fuels, and preserving soil quality – with increased food production in towns and cities – it will be necessary to incorporate integrated (‘systems’) design approaches such as permaculture and the circular economy (which minimise and repurpose ‘waste’) within the existing urban infrastructure. In addition to growing food in urban space, such actions as draught-proofing and thermally insulating existing building stock, and living/working on a more local scale, would serve well to cut our overall energy consumption. In order to curb our use of fossil fuels, methods for reducing overall energy use must be considered at least equally important to expanding low-carbon energy production. In synopsis, it is clear that only by moving from the current linear, ‘take, make, dispose (waste-creation)’ model for resource-consumption, to the systemic, circular alternative of ‘reduce, reuse, recycle, regenerate’, are we likely to meet demands for future generations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3184/003685017x14876775256165

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shift from conventional agriculture to regenerative (or conservation) agriculture is universally applicable.

    “The shift from conventional agriculture, characterized by frequent tillage and complete removal of vegetation for parts of the season, to regenerative (or conservation) agriculture is particularly promising and universally applicable (104).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [104]

    Section 5.6, “Practices of sustainable agriculture” (page unavailable), says practices must be tailored to each case and that there is no “one size fits all” approach. Section 5.6.1, “Conservation agriculture” (page unavailable), also reports variable outcomes depending on conditions, contrary to the claim of universal applicability. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Adams, C.R. and Eswaran, H. (2000) Global land resources in the context of food and environmental security. In: Gawande, S.P. (ed.) Advances in land resources management for the 20th century, pp. 35-50. Soil Conservation Society of India, New Delhi.
  2. Niino, J., Aoki, K. and Antoine, J. (2003) Agro-ecological zoning and GIS application in Asia with special emphasis on land degradation assessment in drylands (LADA) In: Proceedings of a Regional Workshop, Bangkok, Thailand, 10-14 November 2003. ftp://ftp.fao.org/agl/agll/docs/misc38e.pdf [accessed 1 July 2008].
  3. Kapalanga, T.S. (2008) A review of land degradation assessment methods. http://www.unulrt.is/static/ fellows/document/taimi-1-.pdf [accessed 7 February 2017].
  4. Jackson. W. (1980) New roots for agriculture. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, US.
  5. Altieri, M.A. (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
  6. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington. http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf [accessed 7 February 2017].
  7. BP (2016) BP statistical review of world energy. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/ energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-full- report.pdf [accessed 7 February 2017].
  8. Kane, D. (2015) Carbon sequestration potential on agricultural lands: a review of current science and available practices. http://sustainableagriculture.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ Soil_C_review_Kane_Dec_4-final-v4.pdf [accessed 7 February 2017].
  9. Kell, D.B. (2011) Ann. Bot., 108, 407. 110. Kell, D.B. (2012) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci., 367, 1589. 111. Ontl, T.A. and Schulte, L.A. (2012) Nature Education Knowledge, 3, 35. 112.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhodes, C. J.
Corresponding author
Rhodes, Christopher J.
Venue
Science Progress
Published
2017-03
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
80-129
ISSN
  • 0036-8504 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-7163
OpenAlex
W2592196978
Cited by
352
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Progress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Water and Land Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
regenerative agriculture, soil health, soil organic carbon, soil degradation, soil erosion, food security, climate change mitigation, carbon sequestration, urban agriculture, permaculture, circular economy, localization, fossil fuel dependence, energy consumption, groundwater recharge, water retention, soil fertility
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Food Supply, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review