The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Benchmarks in Higher Education: Student Engagement in Online Learning
Abstract
The increase in the adop-tion of Internet-related technologies for online learning has been accompanied by a parallel, but separate, demand for greater accountability in higher education. Measures of student engagement offer valuable indicators of educational quality, yet have been limited to use in on-campus settings. The authors used key engagement dimensions that the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) defined to measure student engagement in online courses from 3 universities. Online students were modestly engaged in selected NSSE dimensions and had a pattern of engagement that differed from on-campus students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In general, the research about online learning supports the idea that student engagement is crucial to student success (Dennen et al., 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea et al., 2006; Swan et al., 2000).”
From Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) (2015) · cites this paper as Robinson & Hullinger, 2008
In the citing paper
“Student engagement is a key element in keeping students connected with the course and, thus, with their learning (Dennen, Darabi, & Smith, 2007; Kehrwald, 2008; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008; Shea, Li, & Pickett, 2006; Swan, Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz, & Maher, 2000).”
From Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE) (2015) · cites this paper as Robinson & Hullinger, 2008
Citations
Cites
Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning Inside The National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D. (2001) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091380109601795 · Cited by 1,193
Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education
Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999) · Cited by 617
What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE
Kuh, G. D. (2003) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · Cited by 448
Engaging the Online Learner: Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction
Conrad, R.-M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004) · Cited by 415
Thurmond, V. A., Wambach, K. A., Connors, H. R., & Frey, B. B. (2002) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1603_4 · Cited by 324
Issues in Web-Based Pedagogy: A Critical Primer
Cole, R. A. (2000) · Cited by 167
Blueprint to the Digital Economy: Creating Wealth in the Era of E-Business
Tapscott, D., Lowy, A., & Ticoll, D. (1998) · Cited by 155
Duderstadt, J. J., Atkins, D. E., & Houweling, D. E. V. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 137
Aggarwal, A. K., & Bento, R. F. (2000) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-878289-60-5.ch001 · Cited by 114
The Online Interaction Learning Model: An Integrated Theoretical Framework for Learning Networks
Hiltz, S. R., & Goldman, R. (2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410611482-9 · Cited by 111
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–618 of 618
The Implications of a Blended Learning Environment on Students' Engagement
Odit-Dookhan, K., Chittoo, H. B., Vaghjee, H., & Makoondlall-Chadee, T. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8402-2.ch010
Yeo, W. S., Loo, V. H., & Chiong, C. W. R. (2025) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-4971-6_18
ÖĞRENCİLERİN ÇEVRİMİÇİ MOTİVASYON VE BAĞLILIK DÜZEYLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ
Öztürk, M., & Türker, P. M. (2025) · Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama · doi:10.17943/etku.1630686
Phipps, D. J., Hannan, T. E., Vasandani, M., Keech, J. J., Green, H. J., & Hamilton, K. (2025) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/14757257251359742 · Cited by 1
Mbuva, J. M. (2025) · Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · doi:10.33423/jhetp.v25i3.7794
Mapping Online Engagement: A DEMATEL-Based Analysis of Instructor Perspectives
Aldowah, H. A., Al‐Samarraie, H., Rehman, S. U., Umar, I. N., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2025) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622025501056
Gender Differences in Students’ Engagement Ratings of Instructor Presence in Online Courses
Mukuni, K., Kincade, D. H., Wang, X., Almunive, W., & Solis, O. (2022) · Quarterly review of distance education · doi:10.1108/qrde-11-2022-0005
The Role Of Learner-Content Interactions And Engagement In Online Courses
Mukuni, K., Douglas, A., & Almunive, W. (2022) · Quarterly review of distance education · doi:10.1108/qrde-04-2022-0004
Khalil, R., Mansour, A. E., Fadda, W. A., Almisnid, K., Aldamegh, M. S., Al‐Nafeesah, A., Alkhalifah, A., & Al-Wutayd, O. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12891156
Androutsopoulos, K., Başķent, C., Kammüller, F., Nalli, G., Piras, L., & Yetgin, H. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13174-4_21
Achackzai, N., & Siddiq, A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8339458/v1
Exploring Learner Engagement in Digital Soft Skills Self-Assessment Tool
Myyryläinen, H., & Heikkinen, S. (2025) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computer · doi:10.1109/icetc66579.2025.11387492
Örün, Ö. (2026) · Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning · doi:10.1080/02680513.2026.2674576
Student Course Engagement and Academic Performance Among BTLED Students
Maneja, J. O., Bañares, H. T., Morales, J. L. D., Lisbos, K. J. A., & Patarata, M. K. (2026) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-9414-6_15
Al‐Hattami, H. M. (2026) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-05-2026-0327
From me to we: An online assessment of interdisciplinary doctoral education and learning impact
Carmody, E. P. (2014) · Creighton Digital Repository (CDR)
(2015) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H.
- Affiliations
- Oral Roberts University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Education for Business
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-109
- ISSN
- 0883-2323 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-3356
- OpenAlex
- W2141114049
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 47.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Education for Business (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- student engagement, online learning, online courses, higher education accountability, educational quality, National Survey of Student Engagement, engagement dimensions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
