Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zika Virus RNA Replication and Persistence in Brain and Placental Tissue

Open access
Bhatnagar, Julu, Rabeneck, Demi B., Martines, Roosecelis B., Reagan-Steiner, Sarah, Ermias, Yokabed, Estetter, Lindsey B.C., Suzuki, Tadaki, Ritter, Jana, Keating, M. Kelly, Hale, Gillian, Gary, Joy, Muehlenbachs, Atis, Lambert, Amy, Lanciotti, Robert, Oduyebo, Titilope, Meaney-Delman, Dana, Bolaños, Fernando, Saad, Edgar Alberto Parra, Shieh, Wun-Ju, Zaki, Sherif R.·2017·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Zika virus is causally linked with congenital microcephaly and may be associated with pregnancy loss. However, the mechanisms of Zika virus intrauterine transmission and replication and its tropism and persistence in tissues are poorly understood. We tested tissues from 52 case-patients: 8 infants with microcephaly who died and 44 women suspected of being infected with Zika virus during pregnancy. By reverse transcription PCR, tissues from 32 (62%) case-patients (brains from 8 infants with microcephaly and placental/fetal tissues from 24 women) were positive for Zika virus. In situ hybridization localized replicative Zika virus RNA in brains of 7 infants and in placentas of 9 women who had pregnancy losses during the first or second trimester. These findings demonstrate that Zika virus replicates and persists in fetal brains and placentas, providing direct evidence of its association with microcephaly. Tissue-based reverse transcription PCR extends the time frame of Zika virus detection in congenital and pregnancy-associated infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid2303.161499

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Bhatnagar, J., Rabeneck, D. B., Martines, R. B., Reagan-Steiner, S., Ermias, Y., Estetter, L. B. C., Suzuki, T., Ritter, J., Keating, M. K., Hale, G., Gary, J., Muehlenbachs, A., Lambert, A., Lanciotti, R., Oduyebo, T., Meaney-Delman, D., Bolaños, F., Saad, E. A. P., Shieh, W.-J., & Zaki, S. R.
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2017-03
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
405-414
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W2562513421
Cited by
215
References
8
FWCI
32.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zika Virus RNA Replication and Persistence in Brain and Placental Tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3201/eid2303.161499
The paper
Bhatnagar, J., Rabeneck, D. B., Martines, R. B., Reagan-Steiner, S., Ermias, Y., Estetter, L. B. C., Suzuki, T., Ritter, J., Keating, M. K., Hale, G., Gary, J., Muehlenbachs, A., Lambert, A., Lanciotti, R., Oduyebo, T., Meaney-Delman, D., Bolaños, F., Saad, E. A. P., Shieh, W.-J., & Zaki, S. R. (2017). Zika Virus RNA Replication and Persistence in Brain and Placental Tissue. Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2303.161499

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.