Cited by 37Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityActinomycetales infections and treatment

Blastomycosis in Minnesota, USA, 1999-2018.

Open access
Ireland, Malia, Klumb, Carrie, Smith, Kirk, Scheftel, Joni·2020·Emerging infectious diseases

Abstract

Blastomycosis is a systemic disease caused by Blastomyces spp. fungi. To determine its epidemiology in blastomycosis-endemic Minnesota, USA, we evaluated all cases reported to public health officials during 1999-2018. We focused on time to diagnosis, exposure activities, and exposure location. A total of 671 cases and a median of 34 cases/year were reported. Median time to diagnosis was 31 days; 61% of patients were not tested for blastomycosis until they were hospitalized. The case-fatality rate was 10%, and patients who died were 5.3 times more likely to have a concurrent medical condition. Outdoor activities and soil exposure were reported by many patients, but no specific activity or exposure was common to most. Almost one third of patients were probably exposed in geographic areas other than their home county. Providers should consider alternative etiologies for patients with pneumonia not responding to antibacterial treatment, and public health officials should increase awareness in blastomycosis-endemic areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid2605.191074

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wisconsin and Minnesota conducted extensive follow-up on cases, providing deeper insight into state-specific features of blastomycosis.

    “Wisconsin and Minnesota conducted extensive follow-up on cases (19,25), providing deeper insight into state-specific features of blastomycosis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ireland, M., Klumb, C., Smith, K., & Scheftel, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Ireland, Malia
Venue
Emerging infectious diseases
Published
2020-05
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
866-875
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W3016789432
Cited by
37
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U50CK000371)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
Keywords
blastomycosis, Blastomyces, Minnesota, time to diagnosis, case fatality rate, soil exposure, outdoor activities, pneumonia, fungal infection, disease surveillance
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antifungal Agents, Blastomyces, Blastomycosis, Humans, Minnesota, Public Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review