Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism of Tau hyperphosphorylation involving lysosomal enzyme asparagine endopeptidase in a mouse model of brain ischemia.

Basurto-Islas, Gustavo, Gu, Jin-hua, Tung, Yunn Chyn, Liu, Fei, Iqbal, Khalid·2018·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Dementias including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are multifactorial disorders that involve several different etiopathogenic mechanisms. Cerebral ischemia has been suspected in the altered regulation of protein kinases and phosphatases that leads to hyperphosphorylation of tau and further neurofibrillary pathology, a key hallmark of AD and related neurodegenerative diseases. However, the deregulation of these enzymes and their relationship with ischemia and AD remain unclear. Previously, we reported a mechanism by which the lysosomal enzyme asparagine endopeptidase (AEP) is associated with brain acidosis and AD. In this study, we subjected mice to middle cerebral artery occlusion and found that compared with wild type mice, the ischemia-induced brain injury and motor deficit in AEP-knockout mice are reduced, probably because ischemia activates AEP. AEP cleaves inhibitor 2 of protein phosphatase 2A (I 2 PP2A), which translocates from the neuronal nucleus to the cytoplasm and produces hyperphosphorylation of tau through inhibition of PP2A. These findings suggest a possible mechanism of tau pathology associated with ischemia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-170715

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1074/jbc.M311768200 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.05.106 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/jama.292.23.2901 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jns.2008.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3233/JAD-140144 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)38495-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4913 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1074/jbc.M110.110957 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1073/pnas.94.1.298 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5562 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nm0796-783 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1517/14728222.2014.870156 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s00401-009-0486-3 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S1471-4914(01)02266-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1074/jbc.M006219200 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04391.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.097 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62486-8 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.07.020 · DOI
  21. 10.1096/fj.10-158477 · DOI
  22. 10.1074/jbc.M112.446070 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/nm.3700 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.017 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M305930200 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.11.004 · DOI
  27. 10.1074/jbc.M302742200 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00434-3 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1080/01616412.1997.11740874 · DOI
  30. 10.1161/01.STR.20.1.84 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1074/jbc.270.32.18917 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1212/WNL.44.10.1885 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)02113-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30290-7 · DOI
  36. Song B, 2013, Neural Regen Res, 8, 3173, 10.4103/1673-5374.121652 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.39 · DOI
  38. 10.1159/000112845 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.0809824105 · DOI
  40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-23-10291.2002 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.09.022 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/jnci/dju012 · DOI
  43. Liu C, 2003, Cancer Res, 63, 2957
  44. 10.1002/jcb.24143 · DOI
  45. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052980 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s10549-006-9311-z · DOI
  47. 10.1002/pmic.201200006 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/ncomms9762 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601518 · DOI
  50. Lam BD, 2012, Cytometry A, 81, 81
  51. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.07.020 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00417-O · DOI
  53. 10.1097/00004647-200003000-00013 · DOI
  54. 10.1161/01.STR.15.1.5 · DOI
  55. 10.1161/01.STR.29.3.705 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.034 · DOI
  57. 10.1371/journal.pone.0051552 · DOI
  58. 10.1155/2014/962343 · DOI
  59. 10.1096/fj.10-158477 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Basurto-Islas, G., Gu, J.-H., Tung, Y. C., Liu, F., & Iqbal, K.
Affiliations
Department of Neurochemistry, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
821-833
ISSN
  • 1387-2877
  • 1875-8908
Cited by
39
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review