Cited by 189Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsPain Management and Treatment

The functional performance of the Argus II retinal prosthesis

Open access
Stronks, H Christiaan, Dagnelie, Gislin·2014·Expert Review of Medical Devices

Abstract

Visual prostheses are devices to treat profound vision loss by stimulating nerve cells anywhere along the visual pathway, typically with electrical pulses. The Argus II implant, developed by Second Sight Medical Products (SSMP, Sylmar, CA, USA), targets the retina and features 60 electrodes that electrically stimulate the surviving retinal neurons. Of the approximately 20 research groups that are actively developing visual prostheses, SSMP has the longest track record. The Argus II was the first visual prosthesis to become commercially available: it received the European conformity mark in 2011 and FDA approval was granted in early 2013 for humanitarian use in the USA. Meanwhile, the Argus II safety/benefit study has been extended for research purposes, and is still ongoing. In this review, we will discuss the performance of the Argus II in restoring sight to the blind, and we will shed light on its expected developments in the coming years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/17434440.2014.862494

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stronks, H. C., & Dagnelie, G.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Stronks, H Christiaan
Venue
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Published
2013-11-22
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
23-30
ISSN
  • 1743-4440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2422
OpenAlex
W2027547973
Cited by
189
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Medical Devices (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY021220, R21EY019991)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
Argus II, retinal prosthesis, visual prosthesis, retinal stimulation, blindness, vision restoration, electrode arrays, FDA approval
MeSH terms
Blindness, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Retina, Visual Acuity, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review