Cited by 152Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and PerformanceStress and Burnout Research

Firefighting and mental health: Experiences of repeated exposure to trauma

Open access
Jahnke, Sara A., Poston, Walker S. Carlos, Haddock, Christopher K., Murphy, Beth·2016·Work

Abstract

Background Firefighters must be ready to respond to a broad range of emergencies every duty day. In the course of many of these emergencies, firefighters witness events which have the potential to induce emotional trauma, such as badly injured people, deceased children, and individuals who are highly distraught. Previous research suggests that repeated exposure to these traumas (RET) may have negative impacts on the emotional and mental health of fire service personnel. Research on the mental health of firefighters has been limited to small surveys reporting the prevalence of specific mental health problems such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder among firefighters. Objective Despite the likelihood that RET leads to negative outcomes in firefighters, data is lacking on how exposure impacts fire service personnel. The current study examines the experiences of firefighters related to RET. Methods Using formative research methods, we examined the beliefs and experiences of firefighters and administrators from across the United States regarding the impact of RET on firefighter health. Results Study findings highlight the cumulative psychological toll of repeated exposure to traumatic events including desensitization, flashbacks, and irritability. Conclusion Results of the current study suggest that RET is a significant concern for emergency responders that warrants additional research and attention. It is likely that the long term consequences of RET are closely int…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-162255

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jahnke, S. A., Poston, W. S. C., Haddock, C. K., & Murphy, B.
Affiliations
  • National Development and Research Institutes (US)
  • Integrative Mental Health and Wellness, Bellevue, WA, USA
Venue
Work
Published
2016-04-15
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
737-744
ISSN
  • 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9270
OpenAlex
W2340098190
Cited by
152
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
firefighters, workplace mental health, psychological trauma, desensitization, flashbacks, irritability, first responders, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Wounds and Injuries, Prevalence, Firefighters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review