Cited by 908Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMedical Practices and RehabilitationPsychological Testing and Assessment

Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change

Dimitrov, Dimiter M., Rumrill, Jr., Phillip D.·2003·WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation

Abstract

The article examines issues involved in comparing groups and measuring change with pretest and posttest data. Different pretest-posttest designs are presented in a manner that can help rehabilitation professionals to better understand and determine effects resulting from selected interventions. The reliability of gain scores in pretest-posttest measurement is also discussed in the context of rehabilitation research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-2003-00285

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ANCOVA was chosen rather than repeated measures ANOVA because ANCOVA is more appropriate for estimating posttraining scores in each group after controlling for pretest score.

    “ANCOVA was chosen rather than repeated measures ANOVA because ANCOVA is more appropriate for estimating the posttraining scores in each group after controlling for the pretest score (Dimitrov & Rumrill, 2003).”

    From MASSED TASK REPETITION IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT (2022) · cites this paper as Dimitrov & Rumrill, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, Jr.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • 507 White Hall, College of Education, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242-0001, USA. Tel.: +1 330 672 0582; Fax: +1 330 672 3737; E-mail: ddimitro@kent.edu.
Venue
WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation
Published
2003-01
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
159-165
ISSN
  • 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9270
OpenAlex
W2156656344
Cited by
908
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 36
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
pretest-posttest design, measurement of change, gain score, reliability statistics, group comparison, rehabilitation therapy, intervention effects, rehabilitation research
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Rehabilitation, Research Design, United States, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review