Cited by 35Cognitive Abilities and TestingAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Working memory training impacts the mean diffusivity in the dopaminergic system

Open access
Takeuchi, Hikaru, Taki, Yasuyuki, Nouchi, Rui, Hashizume, Hiroshi, Sekiguchi, Atsushi, Kotozaki, Yuka, Nakagawa, Seishu, Miyauchi, Carlos Makoto +2 more·2015·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

Dopaminergic transmission plays a critical role in working memory (WM). Mean diffusivity (MD) is a sensitive and unique neuroimaging tool for detecting microstructural differences particularly in the areas of the dopaminergic system. Despite previous investigation of the effects of WM training (WMT) on dopamine receptor binding potentials, the effects of WMT on MD remain unknown. In this study, we investigated these effects in young adult subjects who either underwent WMT or received no intervention for 4 weeks. Before and after the intervention or no-intervention periods, subjects underwent scanning sessions in diffusion-weighted imaging to measure MD. Compared with no intervention, WMT resulted in an increase in MD in the bilateral caudate, right putamen, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), right substantia nigra, and ventral tegmental area. Furthermore, the increase in performance on WMT tasks was significantly positively correlated with the mean increase in MD in the clusters of the left DLPFC and of the right ACC. These results suggest that WMT caused microstructural changes in the regions of the dopaminergic system in a way that is usually interpreted as a reduction in neural components.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-014-0845-2

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few studies have investigated changes in structural connectivity following WM training.

    “Similarly, only a few studies have investigated changes in structural connectivity, that is, neural tracts, following WM training [30–33].”

    From Adaptive working memory training does not produce transfer effects in cognition and neuroimaging (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results section (‘The effect of WMT on MD’; page not available) reports changes in mean diffusivity after working-memory training, so the paper is an example of research on training-related neural microstructure. It does not report changes in structural connectivity or neural tracts, and it does not establish that only a few studies have investigated them. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Takeuchi et al. reported that WM training increased the mean diffusivity in regions of the dopaminergic system.

    “Takeuchi et al. [32] reported that WM training increased the mean diffusivity in regions of the dopaminergic system.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Osaka M Nishizaki Y Brain and working memory (in Japanese) 2000 Kyoto Kyoto University Press
  2. Takeuchi H, Kawashima R (2013) Neural bases of individual differences of creativity measured by the divergent thinking test (symposium). In: Association for psychological science 25th annual convention. Washington DC, USA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Nouchi, R., Hashizume, H., Sekiguchi, A., Kotozaki, Y., Nakagawa, S., Miyauchi, C. M., Sassa, Y., & Kawashima, R.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Takeuchi, Hikaru
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2014-07-15
Volume
220
Issue
6
Pages
3101-3111
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2167488754
Cited by
35
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23700306, 25700012, CREST)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (KAKENHI 23700306, 25700012, 23700306)
  • Research Institute of Science and Technology for Society (KAKENHI 23700306, 25700012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
working memory training, mean diffusivity, dopaminergic system, white matter microstructure, diffusion-weighted imaging, caudate nucleus, putamen, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Dopamine, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuronal Plasticity, Neuropsychological Tests, Prefrontal Cortex, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, Dopaminergic Neurons, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review