Cited by 26Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Effects of internet-delivered behavioral activation on individuals with depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Han, Areum, Kim, Tae Hui·2022·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Behavioral activation is recognized as a stand-alone, evidence-based therapy for depression. Internet-delivered psychological interventions are easy to access and low cost. Therefore, it is important to determine whether internet-delivered behavioral activation (iBA) is an effective option for improving depressive symptoms and other health-related outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of iBA on individuals with depressive symptoms. METHODS: statistic values for heterogeneity, either a random effects model or fixed effects model was used. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the type of control groups. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses showed iBA had small to medium effects on depressive symptoms, anxiety, quality of life, functioning, perceived social support, and behavioral activation (BA) in people suffering from depressive symptoms at the immediate posttest and follow-up compared to control conditions. LIMITATIONS: Relatively fewer studies were conducted to compare effects of iBA on outcomes other than depressive symptoms and BA process measures compared to comparison or control conditions. The overall risk of bias across the included RCTs was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Further high-quality studies are needed to verify the effects of iBA on varied health outcomes and BA process measures for individuals with depressive symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.05.031

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, A., & Kim, T. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Tae Hui
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
152
Pages
104-118
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281728899
Cited by
26
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Health Industry Development Institute
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (HR21C0885040021)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
behavioral activation, depressive symptoms, depression, anxiety, quality of life, functioning, social support
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review