Cited by 23Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Induction of food craving experience: the role of mental imagery, dietary restraint, mood and coping strategies.

Jauregui-Lobera·2013·PubMed

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Food craving consists of a strong motivational state whereby a person is driven to seek and ingest a specifically desired food. OBJECTIVES: To explore the influence of mental imagery on the food craving experience as well as to analyse the role of different psychological variables. METHODS: Participants consisted of 65 normal weight undergraduate students. An experimental induction of food craving was analysed considering the actual previous craving and the induced one as a state food craving. Measures of trait food craving, imaging ability, dietary restraint, anxiety, depression, and coping strategies were considered. RESULTS: Sweet foods in general and chocolate in particular were the most craved foods. During the induction thoughts and images were the most highly rated triggers, and all the different sensory modalities were involved. Anxiety, depression, and negative coping strategies influenced the results with regards to the food craving. DISCUSSION: This study confirms the role of mental imagery, the correlation between state and trait food craving, and the influence of different psychological variables on the food craving.

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.3305/nh.2012.27.6.6043

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans do not necessarily require physical reward cues; vivid imagery about the reward may be enough to trigger limbic brain activations of incentive salience in people that would require cues in animals.

    “Humans don’t necessarily require physical reward cues – vivid imagery about the reward may be enough to trigger limbic brain activations of incentive salience in people that would require cues in animals (May et al., 2004; Kochel et al., 2011; Jauregui-Lobera et al., 2012; Miyapuram et al., 2012).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Jauregui-Lobera et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jauregui-Lobera
Venue
PubMed
Publisher
National Institutes of Health
Published
2013-12-16
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1928-35
OpenAlex
W2106290018
Cited by
23
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic library online (Sciences Carlos III Health Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
food cravings, mental imagery, dietary restraint, mood, coping strategies, anxiety, depression, sensory cues, chocolate, sweet foods, motivational states
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Appetite, Depression, Diet, Eating, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Motivation, Students, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review