Cited by 216Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The elaborated intrusion theory of desire: a 10-year retrospective and implications for addiction treatments

Open access
May, Jon, Kavanagh, David J., Andrade, Jackie·2015·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Introduction Ten years after the publication of Elaborated Intrusion (EI) Theory, there is now substantial research into its key predictions. The distinction between intrusive thoughts, which are driven by automatic processes, and their elaboration, involving controlled processing, is well established. Desires for both addictive substances and other desired targets are typically marked by imagery, especially when they are intense. Attention training strategies such as body scanning reduce intrusive thoughts, while concurrent tasks that introduce competing sensory information interfere with elaboration, especially if they compete for the same limited-capacity working memory resources.Conclusion EI Theory has spawned new assessment instruments that are performing strongly and offer the ability to more clearly delineate craving from correlated processes. It has also inspired new approaches to treatment. In particular, training people to use vivid sensory imagery for functional goals holds promise as an intervention for substance misuse, since it is likely to both sustain motivation and moderate craving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.09.016

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intrusive thoughts on the addictive activity can be tormenting if there is little chance of realizing them in action.

    “They argue that intrusive thoughts on the addictive activity can be tormenting if there is little chance of realizing them in action.”
  • PFM strategies might disrupt the elaboration of smoking-related cognition (especially mental imagery)-which is implicated in craving-by competing for the limited cognitive resources that normally subserve such elaboration.

    “Thirdly, PFM strategies might disrupt the elaboration of smoking-related cognition (especially mental imagery)—which is implicated in craving—by competing for the limited cognitive resources that normally subserve such elaboration (May et al. 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
May, J., Kavanagh, D. J., & Andrade, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
May, Jon
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
44
Pages
29-34
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124288307
Cited by
216
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
intrusive thoughts, desire, craving, elaboration, sensory imagery, body scanning, attentional control, working memory, substance use disorders, addiction treatment, motivation, assessment instruments
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Behavior, Addictive, Mindfulness, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review