Cited by 222Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and InterventionsMemory Processes and Influences

Images of desire: cognitive models of craving.

May, Jon, Andrade, Jackie, Panabokke, Nathalie, Kavanagh, David·2004·Memory

Abstract

Cognitive modelling of phenomena in clinical practice allows the operationalization of otherwise diffuse descriptive terms such as craving or flashbacks. This supports the empirical investigation of the clinical phenomena and the development of targeted treatment interventions. This paper focuses on the cognitive processes underpinning craving, which is recognised as a motivating experience in substance dependence. We use a high-level cognitive architecture, Interacting Cognitive Subsystems (ICS), to compare two theories of craving: Tiffany's theory, centred on the control of automated action schemata, and our own Elaborated Intrusion theory of craving. Data from a questionnaire study of the subjective aspects of everyday desires experienced by a large non-clinical population are presented. Both the data and the high-level modelling support the central claim of the Elaborated Intrusion theory that imagery is a key element of craving, providing the subjective experience and mediating much of the associated disruption of concurrent cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658210444000061

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans do not necessarily require physical reward cues; vivid imagery about the reward may be enough to trigger limbic brain activations of incentive salience in people that would require cues in animals.

    “Humans don’t necessarily require physical reward cues – vivid imagery about the reward may be enough to trigger limbic brain activations of incentive salience in people that would require cues in animals (May et al., 2004; Kochel et al., 2011; Jauregui-Lobera et al., 2012; Miyapuram et al., 2012).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as May et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
May, J., Andrade, J., Panabokke, N., & Kavanagh, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Memory
Published
2004-07
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
447-461
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2050556494
Cited by
222
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
craving, substance dependence, mental imagery, intrusive thoughts, cognitive architecture
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Beverages, Cognition, Cues, Emotions, Female, Food, Humans, Imagination, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review