Mine Land Reclamation Strategies for the Restoration of American Chestnut
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chestnut trees prefer soils with pH from 5 to 6, but they grow on a wide range of soil pH and under a wide range of soil nutrient concentrations.
“Chestnut trees prefer soils with pH from 5 to 6, but they grow on a wide range of soil pH and under a wide range of soil nutrient concentrations (French et al. 2007; McCarthy et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2013).”
From Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed Appalachian surface mines (2018) · cites this paper as McCarthy et al. 2008
Cites
Keyes, M. R., & Grier, C. C. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x81-082 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Jacobs, D. F. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.03.013 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
(2005) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vegetation Communities of a Coal Reclamation Site in Southeastern Ohio
Cavender, N., Byrd, S., Bechtoldt, C. L., & Bauman, J. M. (2014) · Northeastern Naturalist · doi:10.1656/045.021.0104 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationBauman, J. M., Keiffer, C. H., & McCarthy, B. C. (2014) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-014-9439-3 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationSurvival and Growth of Chestnut Backcross Seeds and Seedlings on Surface Mines
Skousen, J., Cook, T., Wilson-Kokes, L., & Pena-Yewtukhiw, E. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2012.0368 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed Appalachian surface mines
Skousen, J. G., Dallaire, K., Scagline-Mellor, S., Monteleone, A., Wilson-Kokes, L., Joyce, J., Thomas, C., Keene, T., DeLong, C., Cook, T., et al. (2018) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-018-9643-7 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Evaluating the Use of Tree Shelters for Direct Seeding of Castanea on a Surface Mine in Appalachia
Barton, C., Miller, J., Sena, K., Angel, P., & French, M. (2015) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f6103514 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Gilland, K. E., & McCarthy, B. C. (2012) · Northern Journal of Applied Forestry · doi:10.5849/njaf.11-041 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationAmerican Chestnut Establishment Techniques on Reclaimed Appalachian Surface Mined Lands
Fields-Johnson, C. W., Burger, J. A., Evans, D. M., & Zipper, C. E. (2012) · Ecological Restoration · doi:10.3368/er.30.2.99 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCarthy, B. C., Bauman, J. M., & Keiffer, C. H.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- Miami University (US)
- Venue
- Ecological Restoration
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 2008-11-17
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 292-294
- ISSN
- 1522-4740 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-4079
- OpenAlex
- W2057522955
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Restoration (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- mine reclamation, American chestnut, Castanea dentata, forest restoration, post-mining land rehabilitation, reforestation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
