The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus and Uncertainty in Economic Prediction
Open accessAbstract
The usual practice in economic forecasting is to report point predictions without specifying the attached probabilities.Periodic surveys of such forecasts produce group averages, which are taken to indicate the "consensus" of experts.Measures of the dispersion of individual forecasts around these averages are interpreted as indicating "uncertainty."However, consensus is best defined as the degree of agreement among the corresponding point predictions reported by different forecasters, while uncertainty is properly understood as referring to the diffuseness of the distributions of probabilities that individual forecasters attach to the different possible values of an economic variable.The NBER-ASA quarterly economic outlook surveys provide unique information on probabilistic forecast distributions reported by a large number of individuals for changes in GNP and the implicit price deflator in 1969-81.These data permit comparisons of related point and probability forecasts from the same sources.The matched mean point forecasts and mean probability forecasts are found to agree closely.Standard deviations of point forecasts are generally smaller than the mean standard deviations of the predictive probability distributionsfor the same targets.Thus the former tend to understate uncertainty as measured by the latter.This is so particularly for short horizons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bates, J. M., & Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1969.103 · Cited by 3,201
Unit weighting schemes for decision making
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1975) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty*
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjw024 · Cited by 12,458
Micro Effects of Macro Announcements: Real-Time Price Discovery in Foreign Exchange
Anderson, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., & Vega, C. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803321455151 · Cited by 1,375
Really Uncertain Business Cycles
Bloom, N., Floetotto, M., Jaimovich, N., Saporta-Eksten, I., & Terry, S. J. (2018) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta10927 · Cited by 1,120
Uncertainty and Economic Activity: Evidence from Business Survey Data
Bachmann, R., Elstner, S., & Sims, E. R. (2013) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.5.2.217 · Cited by 991
Metadata
- Authors
- Zarnowitz, V., & Lambros, L.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1983-07
- Pages
- 492-518
- OpenAlex
- W3021653333
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus and Uncertainty in Economic Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w1171
- The paper
- Zarnowitz, V., & Lambros, L. (1983). Consensus and Uncertainty in Economic Prediction. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.