Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Open accessAbstract
A central organizing framework of the voluminous recent literature studying changes in the returns to skills and the evolution of earnings inequality is what we refer to as the canonical model, which elegantly and powerfully operationalizes the supply and demand for skills by assuming two distinct skill groups that perform two different and imperfectly substitutable tasks or produce two imperfectly substitutable goods.Technology is assumed to take a factor-augmenting form, which, by complementing either high or low skill workers, can generate skill biased demand shifts.In this paper, we argue that despite its notable successes, the canonical model is largely silent on a number of central empirical developments of the last three decades, including: (1) significant declines in real wages of low skill workers, particularly low skill males; (2) non-monotone changes in wages at different parts of the earnings distribution during different decades; (3) broad-based increases in employment in high skill and low skill occupations relative to middle skilled occupations (i.e., job 'polarization'); (4) rapid diffusion of new technologies that directly substitute capital for labor in tasks previously performed by moderatelyskilled workers; and (5) expanding offshoring opportunities, enabled by technology, which allow foreign labor to substitute for domestic workers in specific tasks.Motivated by these patterns, we argue that it is valuable to consider a richer framework for analyzing how recent changes in the earnings and employment distribution in the United States and other advanced economies are shaped by the interactions among worker skills, job tasks, evolving technologies, and shifting trading opportunities.We propose a tractable task-based model in which the assignment of skills to tasks is endogenous and technical change may involve the substitution of machines for certain tasks previously performed by labor.We further consider how the evolution of technology in this task-based setting may be endogenized.We show how such a framework can be used to interpret several central recent trends, and we also suggest further directions for empirical exploration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205 · see citing works
Self-citationTrading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring
Grossman, G. M., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.5.1978 · Cited by 2,262 · cited 1× · see citing works
“See, for example, Feenstra and Hanson (2005), Grossman and Rossi-Hansberg (2008), Rodriguez-Clare and Ramondo (2010), and Acemoglu, Gancia and Zilibotti (2010).”
Technical change, inequality, and the labor market
Acemoglu, D. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.40.1.7 · Cited by 1,767 · see citing works
The polarization of the U.S. labor market
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M. S. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282806777212620 · Cited by 1,594 · see citing works
Self-citationJung, C. G. (1956) · Collected Works, Volume 14 · doi:10.1515/9781400845927 · Cited by 885 · see citing works
Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005) · Handbook of Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01018-x · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727 · see citing works
The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market
Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.5.1553 · Cited by 3,824 · see citing works
Self-citationAcemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20160696 · Cited by 3,121 · see citing works
Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring
Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.8.2509 · Cited by 2,111 · see citing works
Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.08.002 · Cited by 1,317 · see citing works
Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”
Autor, D. H. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251868 · Cited by 1,160 · see citing works
Self-citationBrynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31161 · Cited by 995 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24196 · Cited by 962 · see citing works
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Economics of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for the Future of Work
Ernst, E., Merola, R., & Samaan, D. (2019) · IZA Journal of Labor Policy · doi:10.2478/izajolp-2019-0004 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
McClure, P. K. (2018) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439317698637 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Coombs, C., Hislop, D., Taneva, S. K., & Barnard, S. (2020) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101600 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
“The significant growth in awareness regarding the impact of Intelligent Automation on knowledge and service work can be arguably traced back to significant contributions in 2011 from Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2011) and Acemoglu and Autor (2011).”
BackgroundThe rise of robots and the fall of routine jobs
de Vries, G. J., Gentile, E., Miroudot, S., & Wacker, K. M. (2020) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101885 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22252 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Seltzer, N. (2019) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-019-00790-6 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Coombs, C. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102182 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Bunjak, A., Černe, M., & Popovič, A. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103533 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E., Coate, P., & Hotz, V. J. (2014) · IZA Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1186/2193-8997-3-7 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The Comparative Advantage of Cities
Davis, D., & Dingel, J. (2014) · doi:10.3386/w20602 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The Effects of Automation on Labor Demand
Aghion, P., Antonin, C., Bunel, S., & Jaravel, X. (2022) · Robots and AI · doi:10.4324/9781003275534-2 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Papaioannou, G., Mohammed, A.-M., Despoudi, S., Saridakis, G., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102077 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Large language models at work in China’s labor market
Chen, Q., Ge, J., Xie, H., Xu, X., & Yang, Y. (2025) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102413 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ecosystem Graphs: The Social Footprint of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Soylu, D., Liao, T., Creel, K., & Liang, P. (2023) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2961271/v1 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Financialization and the Labor Share of Income
Özdemir, O. (2019) · Review of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.2478/revecp-2019-0015 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Therefore, the income distribution becomes dependent on the changes in the skill composition of workers and skill-biased nature of technological progress (see, for instance, Berman et al., 1994; Autor et al., 1998; Piva and Vivarelli, 2004; Acemoglu and Autor, 2011).”
BackgroundDell'Acqua, F., Kogut, B., & Perkowski, P. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3746564 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Autor, David
- ORCID
- Autor, David
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2010-06
- OpenAlex
- W2106022734
- Cited by
- 2,180
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 222 · 2020: 234 · 2019: 213 · 2018: 183 · 2017: 169 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 156 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 77
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0239538, CAREER)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Keywords
- returns to skills, wage inequality, job polarization, skill-biased technological change, task-based model, offshoring, skill substitution, wage distribution, employment distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
