The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a model of optimal labor income taxation where top incomes respond to marginal tax rates through three channels: (1) standard labor supply, (2) tax avoidance, (3) compensation bargaining.We derive the optimal top tax rate formula as a function of the three corresponding behavioral elasticities.The first elasticity (labor supply) is the sole real factor limiting optimal top tax rates.The optimal tax system should be designed to minimize the second elasticity (avoidance) through tax enforcement and tax neutrality across income forms.The optimal top tax rate increases with the third elasticity (bargaining) as bargaining efforts are zero-sum in aggregate.We provide evidence using cross-country times series macro-evidence and CEO pay micro-evidence.The macro-evidence from 18 OECD countries shows that there is a strong negative correlation between top tax rates and top 1% income shares since 1960, implying that the overall elasticity is large.However, top income share increases have not translated into higher economic growth.US CEO pay evidence shows that pay for luck is quantitatively more important when top tax rates are low.International CEO pay evidence shows that CEO pay is strongly negatively correlated with top tax rates even controlling for ˝rm characteristics and performance, and this correlation is stronger in firms with poor governance.These results are consistent with bargaining effects playing a role in the link between top incomes and top tax rates.If bargaining effects in fact exist, optimal tax rates should be higher than commonly assumed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Employment Fluctuations with Equilibrium Wage Stickiness
Hall, R. E. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828053828482 · Cited by 1,439
Self-selection and Pareto efficient taxation
Stiglitz, J. E. (1982) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/0047-2727(82)90020-2 · Cited by 761
Tax bases, tax rates and the elasticity of reported income
Kopczuk, W. (2005) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.12.005 · Cited by 315
Are U.S. CEOs Paid More? New International Evidence
Fernandes, N., Ferreira, M. A., Matos, P., & Murphy, K. J. (2013) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs122 · Cited by 302
Redistributive Taxation in the Roy Model*
Rothschild, C., & Scheuer, F. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjs076 · Cited by 167
Why Can Modern Governments Tax So Much? An Agency Model of Firms as Fiscal Intermediaries
Kleven, H. J., Kreiner, C. T., & Saez, E. (2009) · doi:10.3386/w15218 · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Cited by
Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distribution and Unemployment
Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. (2017) · doi:10.3386/w24174 · Cited by 380
Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States
Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22945 · Cited by 151
Self-citationGoing Where the Money Is: Strategies for Taxing Economic Elites in Unequal Democracies
Fairfield, T. (2013) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.011 · Cited by 134
Taxation and Innovation in the 20th Century
Akcigit, U., Grigsby, J., Nicholas, T., & Stantcheva, S. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24982 · Cited by 133
Self-citationNew theoretical perspectives on the distribution of income and wealth among individuals,
Stiglitz, J. E. (2016) · Inequality and Growth: Patterns and Policy · doi:10.1057/9781137554543_1 · Cited by 122
Why? The Purpose of the Universe
Goff, P. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198883760.001.0001 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2011-11
- OpenAlex
- W2142813027
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 6
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.