The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the potential impact of artificial intelligence (A.I.) on economic growth.We model A.I. as the latest form of automation, a broader process dating back more than 200 years.Electricity, internal combustion engines, and semiconductors facilitated automation in the last century, but A.I. now seems poised to automate many tasks once thought to be out of reach, from driving cars to making medical recommendations and beyond.How will this affect economic growth and the division of income between labor and capital?What about the potential emergence of "singularities" and "superintelligence," concepts that animate many discussions in the machine intelligence community?How will the linkages between A.I. and growth be mediated by firm-level considerations, including organization and market structure?The goal throughout is to refine a set of critical questions about A.I. and economic growth and to contribute to shaping an agenda for the field.One theme that emerges is based on Baumol's "cost disease" insight: growth may be constrained not by what we are good at but rather by what is essential and yet hard to improve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
“A Model of Growth: Through Creative Destruction”
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951599 · Cited by 7,529
Self-citationThe Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20160696 · Cited by 3,121
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2010) · doi:10.3386/w16082 · Cited by 2,180
The Burden of Knowledge and the “Death of the Renaissance Man”: Is Innovation Getting Harder?
JONES, B. F. (2009) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00531.x · Cited by 1,058
Self-citationAre Ideas Getting Harder to Find?
Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180338 · Cited by 1,002 · cited 1×
“See, for example, Jones (1995), Kortum (1997), Jones (2009), Gordon (2016), and Bloom et al. (2017).”
Self-citationSpeculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine
Good, I. J. (1966) · Advances in Computers · doi:10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60418-0 · Cited by 703
Cited by
The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.20180386 · Cited by 1,003
Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880 · Cited by 825
Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24196 · Cited by 962
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.10130 · Cited by 2,330
Tong, S., Jia, N., Luo, X., & Fang, Z. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3322 · Cited by 531
Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform
Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X., & Liu, M. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24917 · Cited by 408
Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform
Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X., & Liu, M. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3388 · Cited by 408
Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI
Grace, K., Sandkühler, J. F., Stewart, H., Weinstein-Raun, B., Thomas, S., Stein-Perlman, Z., Salvatier, J., Brauner, J., & Korzekwa, R. C. (2025) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.19087 · Cited by 201
The Changing Economics of Knowledge Production
Abis, S., & Veldkamp, L. (2023) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhad059 · Cited by 167
Beraja, M., Kao, A., Yang, D. Y., & Yuchtman, N. (2023) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjad012 · Cited by 133
Allal, Z., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., & Chahine, K. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120392 · Cited by 130
The Effects of Automation on Labor Demand
Aghion, P., Antonin, C., Bunel, S., & Jaravel, X. (2022) · Robots and AI · doi:10.4324/9781003275534-2 · Cited by 58
Self-citationGoyal, A., & Aneja, R. (2020) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.2326 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Aghion, P., Jones, B., & Jones, C.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2017-10
- OpenAlex
- W2765257612
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 8
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.