Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 497

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: An Intergenerational Perspective

Open access
Chetty, Raj, Hendren, Nathaniel, Jones, Maggie, Porter, Sonya·2018·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

We study the sources of racial disparities in income using anonymized longitudinal data covering nearly the entire U.S. population from 1989-2015.We document three results.First, black Americans and American Indians have much lower rates of upward mobility and higher rates of downward mobility than whites, leading to persistent disparities across generations.Conditional on parent income, the black-white income gap is driven by differences in wages and employment rates between black and white men; there are no such differences between black and white women.Hispanic Americans have rates of intergenerational mobility more similar to whites than blacks, leading the Hispanic-white income gap to shrink across generations.Second, differences in parental marital status, education, and wealth explain little of the black-white income gap conditional on parent income.Third, the black-white gap persists even among boys who grow up in the same neighborhood.Controlling for parental income, black boys have lower incomes in adulthood than white boys in 99% of Census tracts.The few areas with small black-white gaps tend to be low-poverty neighborhoods with low levels of racial bias among whites and high rates of father presence among blacks.Black males who move to such neighborhoods earlier in childhood have significantly better outcomes.However, fewer than 5% of black children grow up in such areas.Our findings suggest that reducing the black-white income gap will require efforts whose impacts cross neighborhood and class lines and increase upward mobility specifically for black men.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w24441

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 497

Metadata

Authors
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M., & Porter, S.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2018-03
OpenAlex
W2795053111
Cited by
497
References
16
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: An Intergenerational Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w24441
The paper
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M., & Porter, S. (2018). Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: An Intergenerational Perspective. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24441

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.