The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change
Open accessAbstract
It follows from Hicks' induced innovation hypothesis that rising energy prices in the last two decades should have induced energy-saving innovation. We formulate the hypothesis concretely using a product-characteristics model of energy-using consumer durables, augmenting Hicks' hypothesis to allow for the possibility that government efficiency standards also induce innovation. Through estimation of characteristics transformation surfaces, we find that technological change reduced the total capital and operating costs of air conditioning by one-half and water heating by about one-fifth. Although the rate of overall innovation in these products appears to be independent of energy prices and regulations, the evidence suggests that the direction of innovation has been responsive to energy price changes. In particular, energy price increases induced innovation in a direction that lowered the capital cost tradeoffs inherent in producing more energy-efficient products. In addition, energy price changes induced changes in the subset of technically feasible models that were offered for sale. Our estimates indicate that about one-quarter to one-half of the improvements in mean energy-efficiency of the menu of new models for these products over the last two decades were associated with rising energy prices since 1973. We also find that this responsiveness to price changes increased substantially after product labeling requirements came into effect, and that minimum efficiency standards had a significant positive effect on average efficiency levels. Nonetheless, a sizeable portion of efficiency improvements in these technologies appears to have been autonomous.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Technical change, inequality, and the labor market
Acemoglu, D. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.40.1.7 · Cited by 1,767
Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry
Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2016) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/684581 · Cited by 1,604
Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation
Fischer, C., & Newell, R. G. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001 · Cited by 1,157
Self-citationEnvironmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market
Calel, R., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00470 · Cited by 1,147
Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect?
Binswanger, M. (2001) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00214-7 · Cited by 737
Contribution of air conditioning adoption to future energy use under global warming
Davis, L. W., & Gertler, P. J. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423558112 · Cited by 632
The Role of Energy in Economic Growth
Stern, D. I. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05921.x · Cited by 617
Green investment: Trends and determinants
Eyraud, L., Clements, B., & Wane, A. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.039 · Cited by 452
Assessing Transformation Pathways
(2015) · Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415416.012 · Cited by 159
Nudging Energy Efficiency Behavior: The Role of Information Labels
Newell, R. G., & Siikamäki, J. (2014) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/679281 · Cited by 256
Self-citationEnergy efficiency: economics and policy
Linares, P., & Labandeira, X. (2010) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00609.x · Cited by 230
Popp, D. (2010) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103929 · Cited by 217
Grubb, M., Drummond, P., Poncia, A., McDowall, W., Popp, D., Samadi, S., Penasco, C., Gillingham, K. T., Smulders, S., Glachant, M., et al. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abde07 · Cited by 173
The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation
Newell, R. G. (2010) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grq009 · Cited by 157
Self-citationEndogenizing technological change: Matching empirical evidence to modeling needs
Pizer, W. A., & Popp, D. (2008) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.006 · Cited by 149
Energy Efficiency Economics and Policy
Gillingham, K., Newell, R., & Palmer, K. (2009) · doi:10.3386/w15031 · Cited by 142
Self-citationClimate policy and the ‘carbon haven’ effect
Branger, F., & Quirion, P. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.245 · Cited by 113
How effective are EU minimum energy performance standards and energy labels for cold appliances?
Schleich, J., Durand, A., & Brugger, H. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112069 · Cited by 45
Wang, Y., & Miao, Q. (2021) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2020.101211 · Cited by 38
The paradox of value, directed technical change, and the relative abundance of the chemical elements
Boyce, J. R. (2019) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.101114 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Newell, R., Jaffe, A., & Stavins, R.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1998-03
- OpenAlex
- W3125829307
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
