Cited by 11Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPancreatic function and diabetesGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Insulin sensitivity and pancreatic β-cell function in Ecuadorian women with Turner syndrome

Open access
Álvarez-Nava, Francisco, Bastidas, Daniela, Racines-Orbe, Marcia, Guarderas, Jéssica·2020·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

Objective: To assess insulin sensitivity and pancreatic β-cell function in an adult population of Ecuadorian individuals with Turner syndrome (TS). Design and Methods: This was a cross-sectional correlational study conducted in TS subjects (>20 years old; n=38). A standard 2-hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) was performed in both women with TS and reference group. Glucose, lipids, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were measured. HOMA-IR, QUICKI, McAuley, Matsuda, and Belfiore indices were calculated to evaluate the degree of insulin resistance (IR). The pancreatic β-cell function was assessed using HOMA-β, basal C-peptide Index (CPI), and CPII at 120´. Results: A higher prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance was found in TS subjects compared with the reference group. Although significant differences were found for glucose concentrations at 60´ and 120´ (but not at 0´), only the baseline insulin concentrations differed significantly between the two groups. The values of the IR indices were statistically different between study and reference groups. A significant number of TS subjects diagnosed with IR were differently classified according to the index applied. The concentrations of C-peptide at 0´ and 120´ of TS subjects were similar to those of the control group. In contrast, the CPI and CPII values in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group. Conclusion: It is impossible to select the best surrogate method for the assessment of IR in women with TS. CPI and CPII values could be preferable to other indices to assess the pancreatic β-cell function in TS subjects. Our findings suggest that IR and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction could be independent events in women with TS and both conditions seem to be caused by the disease per se. Our results imply that early screening and intervention for TS would be therapeutic for TS women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2020.00482

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although the majority of diabetes in adult women with TS is attributed to type 2 diabetes, there is accumulating data for a TS-specific type of diabetes.

    “Although the majority of diabetes in adult women is attributed to type 2 diabetes,384 there is accumulating data for a TS-specific type of diabetes.384,707”
  • Multiple studies demonstrate impaired beta cell function as well as reduced insulin sensitivity are involved in the development of diabetes in TS, while one study found glucose intolerance despite apparently normal beta cell function.

    “Furthermore, multiple studies demonstrate impaired beta cell function as well as reduced insulin sensitivity are involved in the development of diabetes in TS ,227,229,384,705,707,708 while one study found glucose intolerance despite apparently normal beta cell function.709”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Álvarez-Nava, F., Bastidas, D., Racines-Orbe, M., & Guarderas, J.
Affiliations
Central University of Ecuador (EC)
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2020-08-07
Volume
11
Pages
482-482
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040377781
Cited by
11
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Universidad Central del Ecuador
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
Turner syndrome, insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, impaired glucose tolerance, C-peptide, basal insulin secretion, HOMA-IR, QUICKI, insulin resistance index, women, Ecuadorian population
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ecuador, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Turner Syndrome, Body Mass Index, Glucose Intolerance, Insulin-Secreting Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review