Cited by 13Reproductive Health and TechnologiesOvarian function and disordersObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Associations of weight-adjusted-waist index and depression with secondary infertility

Open access
Sun, Fei, Liu, Min, Hu, Shanshan, Xie, Ruijie, Chen, Huijuan, Sun, Zhaona, Bi, Huiya·2024·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

Background: Obesity and psychological factors were identified as risk factors for female infertility. The study investigated the correlation between WWI, depression, and secondary infertility, focusing on the potential mediating role of depression. Methods: According to the data from NHANES, this cross-sectional study used multiple regression analysis, subgroup analysis, and smooth curve fitting to explore the relationship between WWI, depression, and secondary infertility. The diagnostic ability of WWI was evaluated and compared to other obesity indicators using the ROC curve. The mediating effect test adopted the distribution of the product. Results: This study involved 2778 participants, including 381 (13.7%) women with secondary infertility. Results showed that higher WWI (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.56) and depression scores (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06) were associated with secondary infertility. There was a positive correlation between WWI and secondary infertility (nonlinear p = 0.8272) and this association was still consistent in subgroups (all P for interaction> 0.05). Compared with other obesity indicators, WWI (AUC = 0.588) also shows good predictive performance for secondary infertility. Mediation analysis showed that depression mediated the relationship between 3.94% of WWI and secondary infertility, with a confidence interval of Z a * Z b excluding 0. Conclusion: WWI exhibited a relatively good correlation in predicting secondary infertility than other obesity indicators, and depression may be a mediator between WWI and secondary infertility. Focusing on the potential mediating role of depression, the risk of secondary infertility due to obesity may be beneficially reduced in women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2024.1330206

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inclusion of height in the BRI formula distinguishes it from other obesity indices such as WWI or VAI, allowing it to more thoroughly reflect body composition and fat distribution.

    “Additionally, the inclusion of height in the BRI formula distinguishes it from other obesity indices such as WWI or VAI, allowing it to more thoroughly reflect an individual’s body composition and fat distribution14,20,21.”

    From The nonlinear association between body roundness index and infertility in married women (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Materials and methods section (Assessment of other obesity indicators; page unavailable) gives a BRI formula containing height and a WWI formula without it. It does not give a VAI formula or establish that including height lets BRI reflect body composition and fat distribution more thoroughly. The Results instead find WWI more predictive than BRI for secondary infertility, which does not resolve their relative ability to reflect body composition. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, F., Liu, M., Hu, S., Xie, R., Chen, H., Sun, Z., & Bi, H.
Affiliations
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
  • University of South China (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Min
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2024-03-07
Volume
15
Pages
1330206-1330206
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392546731
Cited by
13
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight-adjusted waist index, secondary infertility, depression, obesity, female infertility, waist circumference, obesity indices, mediation, NHANES
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Obesity, Morbid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review