Cited by 121Probiotics and Fermented FoodsAgricultural safety and regulationsBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Live Biotherapeutic Products, A Road Map for Safety Assessment

Open access

Abstract

Recent developments in the understanding of the relationship between the microbiota and its host have provided evidence regarding the therapeutic potential of selected microorganisms to prevent or treat disease. According to Directive 2001/83/EC, in the European Union (EU), any product intended to prevent or treat disease is defined as a medicinal product and requires a marketing authorization by competent authorities prior to commercialization. Even if the pharmaceutical regulatory framework is harmonized at the EU level, obtaining marketing authorisations for medicinal products remains very challenging for Live Biotherapeutic Products (LBPs). Compared to other medicinal products currently on the market, safety assessment of LBPs represents a real challenge because of their specific characteristics and mode of action. Indeed, LBPs are not intended to reach the systemic circulation targeting distant organs, tissues, or receptors, but rather exert their effect through direct interactions with the complex native microbiota and/or the modulation of complex host-microbiota relation, indirectly leading to distant biological effects within the host. Hence, developers must rely on a thorough risk analysis, and pharmaceutical guidelines for other biological products should be taken into account in order to design relevant non-clinical and clinical development programmes. Here we aim at providing a roadmap for a risk analysis that takes into account the specificities of LBPs. We describe the different risks associated with these products and their interactions with the patient. Then, from that risk assessment, we propose solutions to design non-clinical programmes and First in Human (FIH) early clinical trials appropriate to assess LBP safety.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2020.00237

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 2001, 2001/83 of 6 November 2001 on the Community Code Relating to Medicinal Products for Human Use, 67
  2. 2016, Early Clinical Trials With Live Biotherapeutic Products: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control Information
  3. 2019, 3053E General monograph on Live Biotherapeutic Products.
  4. 1997, ICHE8 General Considerations For Clinical Trials
  5. 2008, Guideline on Human Cell-Based Medicinal Products–EMEA/CHMP/410869/2006
  6. Wayne, 2019, CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.
  7. Hindler, 2016, CLSI Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria.
  8. 2018, WHO list of Criticaly important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine (WHO CIA List)
  9. 2018, Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine 6th Revision 2018
  10. 2009, ICHQ8(R2) on Pharmaceutical Development
  11. 2011, ICHS6(R1) Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals
  12. 2010, 2010/63 of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes, 33
  13. 2018, ICHS11 Nonclinical Safety Testing in Support of Development of Paediatric Medicines–Draft Version Step 2
  14. 2008, Guideline on Risk Assessment of Medicinal Products on Human Reproduction and Lactation: from Data to Labelling - EMEA/CHMP/203927/2005
  15. 2006, 1902/2006 of 20 December 2006 Amending Regulation 1901/2006 on Medicinal Products for Paediatric Use, 20
  16. 2017, ICHE11(R1) Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Paediatric Population
  17. 1993, ICHE7 Studies in Support of Special Populations: Geriatrics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–121 of 121

Metadata

Authors
Rouanet, A., Bolca, S., Bru, A., Claes, I., Cvejic, H., Girgis, H., Harper, A., Lavergne, S. N., Mathys, S., Pane, M., Pot, B., Shortt, C., Alkema, W., Bezulowsky, C., Blanquet-Diot, S., Chassard, C., Claus, S. P., Hadida, B., Hemmingsen, C., Jeune, C., Lindman, B., Midzi, G., Mogna, L., Movitz, C., Nasir, N., Oberreither, M., Seegers, J. F. M. L., Sterkman, L., Valo, A., Vieville, F., & Cordaillat-Simmons, M.
Affiliations
  • Lallemand (France) (FR)
  • Protexin (GB)
  • Institut Mérieux (France) (FR)
  • Probiotical (Italy) (IT)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Johnson & Johnson (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Nederlands Instituut Voor Zuivel Oonderzoek (NL)
  • Ipsen (France) (FR)
  • Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
  • Chr. Hansen (Denmark) (DK)
  • PiLeJe (France) (FR)
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
7
Pages
237-237
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036229416
Cited by
120
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
live biotherapeutic products, safety assessment, risk analysis, host-microbiota interactions, microbiota-based therapy, drug approval, regulatory framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review