Cited by 10Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Exploring the relationship between ultrasound parameters and muscle strength in older adults: a meta-analysis of sarcopenia-related exercise performance

Open access
Yuan, Han, Kim, Maeng-Kyu·2024·Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound (US) imaging has emerged as a promising tool for assessing age-related muscle changes. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the associations between US parameters and muscle strength, as well as sarcopenia-related functional performance in older adults by integrating data from multiple studies. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase until June 2023. Studies reporting Pearson’s correlation coefficients between US parameters [echo intensity (EI), muscle thickness (MT), cross-sectional area (CSA), pinnations angle (PA), fascicle length (FL)] and measures of muscle strength or physical performance in older adults were included. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model and presented in forest plots. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test. Results: Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed moderate to strong correlations between EI, MT, and CSA with muscle strength. However, no significant associations were found between US parameters and gait speed. For chair stand tests, the strength of associations varied by test type, with weak correlations observed between echo intensity and muscle thickness with sit-to-stand tests. US parameters did not exhibit significant correlations with the Timed Up and Go test. Conclusion: Ultrasonographic measurements of echo intensity (EI) and muscle thickness (MT) demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with muscle strength and functional assessments related to sarcopenia. To enhance the accuracy of sarcopenia diagnosis and the effectiveness of management strategies, there is a need for larger, longitudinal studies that evaluate a comprehensive range of ultrasonographic parameters. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY202410086.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2024.1429530

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yuan and Kim et al. concluded that MT and CSA were moderately related to muscle strength but only weakly to performance-based measures.

    “Yuan and Kim et al. extended the evidence by pooling data across multiple variables, concluding that MT and CSA were moderately related to muscle strength but only weakly to performance-based mea sures (Yuan and Kim, 2024).”

    From Ultrasound-derived muscle variables and physical function in older adults: A scoping review. (2026) · cites this paper as Yuan and Kim, 2024

    The Discussion (§4) reports a moderate association between muscle thickness (MT) and strength and weak associations between MT and sit-to-stand performance. But it describes cross-sectional area (CSA) as strongly correlated with maximal strength, not moderately correlated, and does not report a weak CSA association with performance-based measures. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other recent reviews assessed multiple ultrasound parameters but were limited to healthy, community-dwelling cohorts.

    “others, assessed multiple parameters but were limited to healthy, community-dwelling cohorts (Yuan and Kim, 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mangine, 2018, Echo intensity versus muscle function correlations in older adults are influenced by subcutaneous fat thickness., Ultrasound Med Biol., 44, 1597, 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.04.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, H., & Kim, M.-K.
Affiliations
Kyungpook National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Maeng-Kyu
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2024-09-27
Volume
11
Pages
1429530-1429530
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402933868
Cited by
9
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
sarcopenia, muscle strength, muscle ultrasound, echo intensity, muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, fascicle length, older adults, functional performance, walking speed, sit-to-stand test, Timed Up and Go test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review