Cited by 194Probiotics and Fermented FoodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving End-User Trust in the Quality of Commercial Probiotic Products

Open access

Abstract

In a rapidly growing global probiotic market, end-users have difficulty distinguishing between high quality and poor quality products. This ambiguity threatens the trust consumers and healthcare providers have in probiotic products. To address this problem, we recommend that companies undergo third-party evaluations to certify probiotic quality and label accuracy. In order to communicate about product quality to end-users, indication of certification on product labels is helpful, although not all manufacturers choose to use this approach. Herein we discuss: third-party certification, the process of setting standards for identity, purity, and quantification of probiotics; some emerging methodologies useful for quality assessment; and some technical challenges unique to managing quality of live microbial products. This review provides insights of an Expert Panel engaged in this process and aims to update the reader on relevant current scientific methodologies. Establishing validated methodologies for all aspects of quality assessment is an essential component of this process and can be facilitated by established organizations, such as United States Pharmacopeia. Emerging methodologies including whole genome sequencing and flow cytometry are poised to play important roles in these processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00739

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 2017, Best Practices Guidelines for Probiotics.
  2. 2018, Ph. Eur. Supplement 9.7 Available Now (27 September 2018).
  3. 2002, Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food.
  4. Probiotics Dietary Supplements Market Anallysis by Application (Food Supplements, Nutritional Supplements, Specialty Nutrients, Infant Formula), by Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, CSA), and Segment Forecasts 2018-2025. Report Number GRV-1-68038-395-5.
  5. Probiotics Ingredient Market Analysis by Ingredient (Bacteria (Lactobacilli, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus), Yeast, Spore Formers), by End User (Human, Animal), Competitive Landscape, and Segment Forecast 2018-2025. Report Number GRV-1-68038-395-9.
  6. Greve, 2017, P05-045: Detection of Listeria in probiotic cultures., Paper Presented at the IFT 2017 Annual Meeting 25-28 June 2017
  7. 2005, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1).
  8. 1995, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results – Part 6: Use in Practice of Accuracy Values. ISO 5725-6:1995.
  9. 2003, Yogurt – Enumeration of Characteristic Microorganisms – Colony-Count Technique at 37 Degrees C. ISO 7889:2003 (IDF 117:2003).
  10. 2006, Milk Products – Enumeration of Presumptive Lactobacillus acidophilus on a Selective Medium – Colony-Count Technique at 37 Degrees C. ISO 20128:2006 (IDF 192:2006).
  11. 2010, Milk Products – Enumeration of Presumptive Bifidobacteria – Colony Count Technique at 37 Degrees C. ISO 29981:2010 (IDF 220:2010).
  12. 2017, Probiotics Market by Application (Functional Food and Beverages [Dairy, Non-Dairy Beverages, Baked Goods, Meat, Cereal], Dietary Supplements, Animal Feed), Source [Bacteria, Yeast], Form [Dry, Liquid], End User [Human, Animal], and Region – Forecast to 2022. Report code: FB 2269.
  13. Schoeni, 2015, “Probiotics,” in, Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, 232
  14. Shannon, 2017, P3-191: Detection of Salmonella in probiotic cutures., Paper Presented at the IAFP Annual Meeting, 9-12 July 2017
  15. Staley, 1984, “Classification of prokaryote organisms: an overview,” in, Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 1
  16. 1994, Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. Public Law 103-417.
  17. 2017, Chapter 8.10: Isolation and Identification of Listeria monocytogenes From Red Meat, Poultry, Ready-to-Eat Siluriformes (Fish), and Egg Products, and Environmental Samples. In Microbiological Laboratory Guidebook.
  18. 1997, HACCP Principles & Application Guidelines.
  19. 2007, 21 CFR Part 111: Current Good Manufacturing Practices in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements.
  20. 2016, Early Clinical Trials With Live Biotherapeutic Products: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control Information Guidance for Industry.
  21. Chapter 5: Salmonella. In Bacteriological Analytical Manual.
  22. Draft Guidance: Policy Regarding Quantitative Labeling of Dietary Supplements Containing Live Microbials: Guidance for Industry.
  23. 2013, General Chapters, Dietary Supplements, <2021> Microbial Enumeration Tests—Nutritional and Dietary Supplements. USP41-NF36.
  24. 2019, General Tests and Assays: Probiotic Tests <64>. In USP42-NF37 First Supplement.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–194 of 194

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, S. A., Schoeni, J. L., Vegge, C., Pane, M., Stahl, B., Bradley, M., Goldman, V. S., Burguière, P., Atwater, J. B., & Sanders, M. E.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Eurofins (United States) (US)
  • Chr. Hansen (Denmark) (DK)
  • DuPont (United States) (US)
  • United States Pharmacopeial Convention (US)
Corresponding author
Sanders, Mary Ellen
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2019-04-17
Volume
10
Pages
739-739
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936341475
Cited by
192
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
probiotics, third-party certification, consumer trust, product labeling, United States Pharmacopoeia, whole genome sequencing, flow cytometry, quality standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review