The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 159 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactions by Disorder – A Matter of Context
Open accessAbstract
Living organisms depend on timely and organized interactions between proteins linked in interactomes of high complexity. The recent increased precision by which protein interactions can be studied, and the enclosure of intrinsic structural disorder, suggest that it is time to zoom out and embrace protein interactions beyond the most central points of physical encounter. The present paper discusses protein-protein interactions in the view of structural disorder with an emphasis on flanking regions and contexts of disorder-based interactions. Context constitutes an overarching concept being of physicochemical, biomolecular, and physiological nature, but it also includes the immediate molecular context of the interaction. For intrinsically disordered proteins, which often function by exploiting short linear motifs, context contributes in highly regulatory and decisive manners and constitute a yet largely unrecognized source of interaction potential in a multitude of biological processes. Through selected examples, this review emphasizes how multivalency, charges and charge clusters, hydrophobic patches, dynamics, energetic frustration, and ensemble redistribution of flanking regions or disordered contexts are emerging as important contributors to allosteric regulation, positive and negative cooperativity, feedback regulation and negative selection in binding. The review emphasizes that understanding context, and in particular the role the molecular disordered context and flanking regions take on in protein interactions, constitute an untapped well of energetic modulation potential, also of relevance to drug discovery and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although there are clear context dependent modulations of intrinsic sequence-ensemble relationships, these modulations range from being negligible to predictable based on the sequence features of IDRs and the types of folded domains to which IDRs are tethered.80,81”
From AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (2021) · cites this paper as [81]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains
Anfinsen, C. B. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · Cited by 7,096 · cited 1×
“…the importance of context in the understanding of proteins was formulated by Christian B. Anfinsen stating “ that the native conformation is determined by the totality of interatomic interactions and hence by the amino acid sequence, in a given environment ” (Anfinsen et al., 1961; Anfinsen, 1973).”
BackgroundBiomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry
Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A., & Rosen, M. K. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.7 · Cited by 6,058 · cited 1×
“Localization of NPM1 within nucleoli depends upon its ability to undergo LLPS with Arg-motif containing proteins and ribosomal RNA (Mitrea et al., 2016; Banani et al., 2017).”
BackgroundAlberti, S., Gladfelter, A., & Mittag, T. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035 · Cited by 2,856 · cited 2×
“Additional examples illustrate how IDRs with multiple interacting motifs can participate in LLPS mediated by weak multivalent interactions (Boija et al., 2018; Alberti et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSensors and regulators of intracellular pH
Casey, J. R., Grinstein, S., & Orlowski, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2820 · Cited by 2,218 · cited 1×
“Thus, depending on location (Casey et al., 2010), IDPs may compact, gain secondary structure, or engage in folding or partial folding when the pH changes.”
BackgroundA signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors
Heery, D. M., Kalkhoven, E., Hoare, S., & Parker, M. G. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42750 · Cited by 2,128
Role of the CLOCK Protein in the Mammalian Circadian Mechanism
Gekakis, N., Staknis, D., Nguyen, H. B., Davis, F. C., Wilsbacher, L. D., King, D. P., Takahashi, J. S., & Weitz, C. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5369.1564 · Cited by 2,035
Wang, J., Choi, J.-M., Holehouse, A., Lee, H. O., Zhang, X., Jahnel, M., Maharana, S., Lemaitre, R., Pozniakovsky, A., Drechsel, D., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.006 · Cited by 1,876 · cited 1×
“In phase separation, the context of the disordered chain also has implications for interactions as explained by the stickers-and-spacers model of phase separation developed based on studies of RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains (Wang et al., 2018; Martin et al., 2020).”
BackgroundBoija, A., Klein, I. A., Sabari, B. R., Dall’Agnese, A., Coffey, E. L., Zamudio, A. V., Li, C. H., Shrinivas, K., Manteiga, J. C., Hannett, N. M., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.042 · Cited by 1,815 · cited 6×
“Furthermore, for a mutant of GCN4 in which the aromatic residues of the hydrophobic patches were changed to Ala, incorporation into MED15 droplets was attenuated (Boija et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialPCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork
Moldovan, G.-L., Pfander, B., & Jentsch, S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.003 · Cited by 1,796 · cited 2×
“PCNA has an enormous interactome (Moldovan et al., 2007; Prestel et al., 2019) 1 ), and the APIM motif [KR] (cid:127)(cid:56) 2 [KR] for cytosolic partners (Gilljam et al., 2009; Sebesta et al., 2017).”
BackgroundBoisvert, F., van Koningsbruggen, S., de Navascués, J., & Lamond, A. I. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2184 · Cited by 1,671 · cited 1×
“The nucleolus, a membrane-less compartment, is the site of ribosome biogenesis (Boisvert et al., 2007).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–156 of 156
Unambiguous Tracking of Protein Phosphorylation by Fast High‐Resolution FOSY NMR**
Lesovoy, D. M., Georgoulia, P. S., Diercks, T., Matečko‐Burmann, I., Burmann, B. M., Bocharov, E. V., Bermel, W., & Orekhov, V. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202102758 · Cited by 7
Pelham, J. F., Mosier, A. E., Altshuler, S. C., Kirchhoff, C. L., Fall, W. B., Baik, L. S., Chiu, J. C., & Hurley, J. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3982676 · Cited by 7
Mihalič, F., Åberg, E., Farkhondehkish, P., Theys, N., Andersson, E., & Jemth, P. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4684 · Cited by 6
Protein activities driven by amino acid composition
Cascarina, S. M., & Ross, E. D. (2025) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110640 · Cited by 6
“When dealing with IDRs and LCDs, it is tempting to assume that the most prominent compositional features are also the most important for protein activity.”
InfluentialJara, K. A., Loening, N. M., Reardon, P. N., Yu, Z., Woonnimani, P., Brooks, C., Vesely, C. H., & Barbar, E. J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.80217 · Cited by 6
LeBlanc, C. J., Stefani, J., Soriano, M., Lam, A., Zintel, M. A., Kotha, S. R., Chase, E., Pimentel-Solorio, G., Vunnum, A., Hu, G. F., et al. (2026) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1012069 · Cited by 9
“A leading model for activation domain function is that they are composed of short linear motifs [33] embedded in a permissive (often acidic) context [36].”
DNA binding redistributes activation domain ensemble and accessibility in pioneer factor Sox2Preprint
Bjarnason, S., McIvor, J. A. P., Prestel, A., Demény, K. S., Bullerjahn, J. T., Kragelund, B. B., Mercadante, D., & Heidarsson, P. O. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.16.545083 · Cited by 7
Singer, A., Ramos, A., & Keating, A. E. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5094 · Cited by 6
“Acidic residues flanking the (cid:1) 3 [FWYL]Px Φ P 1 motif strengthen binding to positively charged patches along the domain (Niebuhr et al., 1997).”
InfluentialSimonsen, S., Larsen, F. B., Søgaard, C. K., Jonsson, N., Lindorff‐Larsen, K., Bruheim, P., Otterlei, M., Hartmann‐Petersen, R., & Kragelund, B. B. (2025) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.70133 · Cited by 6
“Such so-called context effects can emerge from different features and properties [13], and recent work has highlighted the importance of SLiM-flanking regions in determining binding affinities as well as positive and negative partner selectivity [14,15].”
Carey, O., Fehilly, J., O’Leary, E. T., O’Shea, S., Juda, K., Fitzel, R., Selvaraj, P., Burk, K., Lindsay, A. J., Young, P. W., et al. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169314 · Cited by 6
Interpreting Transient Interactions of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Wohl, S., & Zheng, W. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.1218 · Cited by 5
Who Binds Better? Let Alphafold2 Decide!
Varga, J. K., & Schueler‐Furman, O. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202303526 · Cited by 6
Droplets of life: role of phase separation in virus replication and compartmentalization
Pesce, G., Brocca, S., Grandori, R., Longhi, S., & Uversky, V. N. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823967-4.00019-1 · Cited by 5
The N-Myc MB0-MBI region interacts specifically and dynamically with the N-lobe of Aurora kinase A
Hultman, J., Morad, V., Tanner, E., Kenney, T. M. G., Pietras, Z., Khare, L. P., Derbyshire, D. J., Resetca, D., Arrowsmith, C. H., Aili, D., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69725-1 · Cited by 4
“Recentadvancesidentifyingwhichoftheseproteinsdirectly interact with MYC has afforded us and others to reveal structural and dynamic features of protein interactions to MYC boxes and adjacent residues 15 – 22 , several of which show characteristic IDP recognition modes 10,12,23 .”
Systems Pharmacology: Enabling Multidimensional Therapeutics
Maudsley, S. R., Leysen, H., van Gastel, J., & Martin, B. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820472-6.00017-7 · Cited by 5
Exploring Manually Curated Annotations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins with DisProt
Quaglia, F., Hatos, A., Salladini, E., Piovesan, D., & Tosatto, S. C. E. (2022) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.484 · Cited by 4
“…GO terms, classified into one of the three aspects—i.e., Molecular Function, Biological Process, and Cellular Component—by clicking on the AmiGO 2 ( http://amigo.geneontology.org/ amigo ; Carbon et al., 2009) or on the QuickGO ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ QuickGO/ ; Binns et al., 2009) tools linked.”
BackgroundUversky, V. N. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823967-4.00011-7 · Cited by 4
Transient non-local interactions dominate the dynamics of measles virus NTAIL
Otteson, L., Nagy, G., Kunkel, J. D., Kodis, G., Bock, L. V., Bignon, C., Longhi, S., Zheng, W., Grubmüller, H., Vaiana, A. C., et al. (2025) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-025-01682-0 · Cited by 4
“Our results for N TAIL corroborate the importance of fl anking regions in IDPs that bind via short molecular recognition elements (MoREs) 64 , and suggest a regulatory roleofregionsthatmaybefarinthesequencefromMoREs.”
Vasseur, L., Barbault, F., & Monari, A. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c00965 · Cited by 4
Wang, B., Svetlov, V. V., Wolf, Y. I., Koonin, E. V., Nudler, E., & Artsimovitch, I. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.24.428004 · Cited by 4
Saar, D., Lennartsson, C., Weidner, P., Burgermeister, E., & Kragelund, B. B. (2024) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26774 · Cited by 3
PairK : Pairwise k‐mer alignment for quantifying protein motif conservation in disordered regions
Halpin, J. C., & Keating, A. E. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.70004 · Cited by 3
Disordered peptide-based design of intrinsically disordered polymers for biomedical applications
Coskuner‐Weber, O., Çaylı, F. N., & Uversky, V. N. (2025) · International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization · doi:10.1080/1023666x.2025.2458470 · Cited by 3
“[45] For example, the p53 tumor suppressor protein includes disorder-promoting residues that enable interactions with a wide array of protein partners implicated in DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis.”
Antonescu, O. N., Utichi, M., Sora, V., Tiberti, M., Maiani, E., Lambrughi, M., & Papaleo, E. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.30.560296 · Cited by 3
A proteome-wide biochemical screen defines binding determinants of the core autophagy protein LC3BPreprint
Kosmatka, J., Liu, C., Halpin, J. C., Lim, D., Davis, J. H., & Keating, A. E. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.05.697675 · Cited by 4
“…(Kumar et al. , 2022) and Motif Map of the Proteome (https://slim.icr.ac.uk/momap/) databases, capture the features that best typify known binders but also highlight the limitations of existing motif specifications, which are satisfied by many sequences that fail to bind (Bugge et al. , 2020).”
Niazi, S. K. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26136246 · Cited by 2
“FINCHES predictions represent equilibrium thermodynamic preferences but cannot address whether predicted interactions will occur on relevant biological timescales [175].”
Uncovering the Association Mechanism between Two Intrinsically Flexible Proteins
Dávalos, A. L., Rivera, J. D., Favaro, D. C., de Oliveira, R. J., Carretero, G., Lacerda, C. D., Cuccovia, I. M., Cardoso, M. V. C., Farah, C. S., & Salinas, R. K. (2024) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.3c00649 · Cited by 2
Jacobsen, N. L., Bloch, M., Millard, P. S., Ruidiaz, S. F., Elsborg, J. D., Boomsma, W., Hendus-Altenburger, R., Hartmann‐Petersen, R., & Kragelund, B. B. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4733 · Cited by 1
Enrichment patterns of intrinsic disorder in proteins
Patil, A. (2022) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-022-01016-7 · Cited by 2
“Post-translational modifications play a large role in the functional modulation of IDPs (Bah and Forman-Kay 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialPathogenic mutations of human phosphorylation sites affect protein-protein interactionsPreprint
Rrustemi, T., Meyer, K., Roske, Y., Uyar, B., Akalin, A., Imami, K., Ishihama, Y., Daumke, O., & Selbach, M. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.01.551433 · Cited by 2
Unambiguous Tracking of Protein Phosphorylation by Fast High‐Resolution FOSY NMR**
Lesovoy, D. M., Georgoulia, P. S., Diercks, T., Matečko‐Burmann, I., Burmann, B. M., Bocharov, E. V., Bermel, W., & Orekhov, V. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.202102758 · Cited by 1
Decoding phospho-regulation and flanking regions in autophagy-associated short linear motifs
Utichi, M., Antonescu, O. N., Sora, V., Marjault, H., Tiberti, M., Maiani, E., Lambrughi, M., & Papaleo, E. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08399-9 · Cited by 1
Tahzima, R., Charon, J., Díaz, A., Jonghe, K. D., Massart, S., Michon, T., & Vranken, W. (2025) · Frontiers in Virology · doi:10.3389/fviro.2025.1501616 · Cited by 1
Milton, M. E., & Visick, K. L. (2023) · Communicative & Integrative Biology · doi:10.1080/19420889.2023.2203626 · Cited by 1
“Since disordered regions are known to facilitate protein-protein interactions [52,53], this unstructured region may facilitate SypA binding to proteins other than SypE.”
BackgroundSensitivity to chirality correlates in a continuum with protein disorder
Álvarez, L., & Chemes, L. B. (2025) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2025.04.003 · Cited by 1
Dissection of the role of a SH3 domain in the evolution of binding preference of paralogous proteinsPreprint
Lemieux, P., Bradley, D. T. C., Dubé, A. K., Dionne, U., & Landry, C. R. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.03.09.531510 · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, the mechanisms behind the contribution of disordered regions to PPI are also undefined, but the modifications of these regions, as we did by replacing the binding motif, can also affect binding (Bugge et al. 2020).”
BackgroundA proteome-wide biochemical screen defines binding determinants of the core autophagy protein LC3BPreprint
Kosmatka, J., Liu, C., Halpin, J. C., Lim, D., Davis, J. H., & Keating, A. E. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.110318.1 · Cited by 2
Short Disordered Epitope of CRTAM Ig-Like V Domain as a Potential Target for Blocking Antibodies
Vázquez-Martínez, J. A., Gómez-Lim, M. Á., Morales‐Ríos, E., González-y-Merchand, J. A., & Ortiz-Navarrete, V. F. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21228798 · Cited by 1
ADAP’s intrinsically disordered region is an actin sponge regulating T cell motilityPreprint
Dadwal, N., Degen, J., Sticht, J., Hilal, T., Wegner, T., Reichardt, P., Lyck, R., Abadier, M., Hons, M., Mix, C., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.12.14.472590
Shinn, M. K., Cohan, M. C., Bullock, J. L., Ruff, K. M., Levin, P. A., & Pappu, R. V. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.29.498098
“A common occurrence is of autoregulatory IDRs tethered either as tails to folded domains or as linkers between folded domains (5-12).”
Interpreting transient interactions of intrinsically disordered proteinsPreprint
Wohl, S., & Zheng, W. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.11.14.516525
Who Binds Better? Let Alphafold2 Decide!
Varga, J. K., & Schueler‐Furman, O. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.202303526
Pérez-Jover, I., Rochon, K., Hu, D., Mohan, P. M., Santos-Pérez, I., Gisasola, J. O., Galvez, J. M. M., Agirre, J., Qi, X., Mears, J. A., et al. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3161608/v1
Interactions among the three protein states
Kadeřávek, P., Kubíček, K., & Žı́dek, L. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21809-5.00022-3
Dynamic yet well-defined organization of the FUS RGG3 dense phase
Polyansky, A. A., Frühbauer, B., & Žagrović, B. (2026) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-026-01974-z
“…presenceoflinearmotifs,andevena “ grammar ” canbe linkedwith thelevel of protein disorderedness 19,20 , interaction preference 21 – 23 , susceptibility to post-translational modi fi cations 24 , and potential for biomolecular condensate formation 25 – 27 .”
Giri, M., Brasnett, C., Eroglu, K. F., Buhl, J. M., André, A. A. M., Marrink, . J., Mulder, F. A. A., & Kjærgaard, M. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.07.669161
A proteome-wide biochemical screen defines binding determinants of the core autophagy protein LC3BPreprint
Kosmatka, J., Liu, C., Halpin, J. C., Lim, D., Davis, J. H., & Keating, A. E. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.110318
Due, A. D., Jørsboe, S., Jensen, L. T., O’Shea, C., Staulund, M., Willemoës, M., Kragelund, B. B., Sjøgaard, I. M. Z., & Skriver, K. (2026) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2026.111312
“Since the sequence motif context may dramatically affect binding for ID-based interactions (28, 29), we designed and tested a longer Tet1 fragment, Tet1 829–930 , covering the entire disordered region surrounding the SID (Fig.”
Protein disorder controls allostery in DNAPreprint
Rosenblum, G., Terterov, I., Mishra, S. K., Elad, N., Gianga, T., Hussain, R., Siligardi, G., & Hofmann, H. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.17.710445
Poskin, L., Bâlon, H., Leyder, T., Michaux, C., & Mignon, J. (2026) · Critical Insights in Biophysics · doi:10.1080/29932203.2026.2638665
Phase transition and amyloid formation by V and W proteins of Nipah and Hendra viruses
Pesce, G. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/570bc753z2ce3z4de4zad02z7c412661be10
Kawagoe, S., Kumeta, H., & Saio, T. (2026) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.7340537
Kawagoe, S., Kumeta, H., & Saio, T. (2026) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.7340537
Beyond the structure-function paradigm: A comprehensive review of intrinsically disordered proteins
Harake, S. N. A., Btadini, S., Qadri, A. H., Harb, F., & Faheem, I. (2026) · Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2026.102706
“Their disordered regions promote multivalent, low-affinity interactions, enabling the assembly of dynamic protein complexes involved in processes such as transcription and post-translational regulation [89].”
A proteome-wide biochemical screen defines binding determinants of the core autophagy protein LC3BPreprint
Kosmatka, J., Liu, C., Halpin, J. C., Lim, D., Davis, J. H., & Keating, A. E. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.110318.2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bugge, K., Brakti, I., Fernandes, C. B., Dreier, J. E., Lundsgaard, J. E., Olsen, J. G., Skriver, K., & Kragelund, B. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Skriver, Karen
- Kragelund, Birthe B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-06-16
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 110-110
- ISSN
- 2296-889X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7308724
- OpenAlex
- W3036355682
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 159
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk Fonden
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › 14-3-3 protein interactions
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, intrinsically disordered proteins, structural disorder, flanking regions, context-dependent interactions, short linear motifs, multivalency, charge clusters, hydrophobic patch, allosteric regulation, feedback regulation, protein-protein interaction network, drug discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review