Cited by 71Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Detection of bacterial antigens and Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in the central nervous system of BALB/c mice following intranasal infection with a laboratory isolate of Chlamydia pneumoniae

Open access
Little, Christopher S., Joyce, Timothy A., Hammond, Christine J., Matta, Hazem, Cahn, David, Appelt, Denah M., Balin, Brian J.·2014·Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Abstract

Pathology consistent with that observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has previously been documented following intranasal infection of normal wild-type mice with Chlamydia pneumoniae (Cpn) isolated from an AD brain (96-41). In the current study, BALB/c mice were intranasally infected with a laboratory strain of Cpn, AR-39, and brain and olfactory bulbs were obtained at 1-4 months post-infection (pi). Immunohistochemistry for amyloid beta or Cpn antigens was performed on sections from brains of infected or mock-infected mice. Chlamydia-specific immunolabeling was identified in olfactory bulb tissues and in cerebrum of AR-39 infected mice. The Cpn specific labeling was most prominent at 1 month pi and the greatest burden of amyloid deposition was noted at 2 months pi, whereas both decreased at 3 and 4 months. Viable Cpn was recovered from olfactory bulbs of 3 of 3 experimentally infected mice at 1 and 3 months pi, and in 2 of 3 mice at 4 months pi. In contrast, in cortical tissues of infected mice at 1 and 4 months pi no viable organism was obtained. At 3 months pi, only 1 of 3 mice had a measurable burden of viable Cpn from the cortical tissues. Mock-infected mice (0 of 3) had no detectable Cpn in either olfactory bulbs or cortical tissues. These data indicate that the AR-39 isolate of Cpn establishes a limited infection predominantly in the olfactory bulbs of BALB/c mice. Although infection with the laboratory strain of Cpn promotes deposition of amyloid beta, this appears to resolve following reduction of the Cpn antigen burden over time. Our data suggest that infection with the AR-39 laboratory isolate of Cpn results in a different course of amyloid beta deposition and ultimate resolution than that observed following infection with the human AD-brain Cpn isolate, 96-41. These data further support that there may be differences, possibly in virulence factors, between Cpn isolates in the generation of sustainable AD pathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00304

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After intranasal inoculation in mice, C. pneumoniae antigens and/or infectious organisms have been detected in the olfactory mucosa and the olfactory bulb 1-4 months post intranasal inoculation.

    “After intranasal inoculation in mice, C. pneumoniae antigens and/or infectious organisms have been detected in the olfactory mucosa and the olfactory bulb 1–4 months post intranasal inoculation16–18, and C. pneumoniae DNA in these tissues has been detected 1 week after inoculation18, strongly suggesting that the bacteria can infect the CNS via the olfactory nerve.”

    From Chlamydia pneumoniae can infect the central nervous system via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and contributes to Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports C. pneumoniae antigen in olfactory bulbs at 1 and 3 months and viable organisms in olfactory bulbs at 1, 3, and 4 months after intranasal infection. It does not report detection in the olfactory mucosa, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The time-frame for infection of the CNS by C. pneumoniae was considerably faster than what has previously been shown (1 week-3 months).

    “The time-frame for infection of the CNS by C. pneumoniae was considerably faster than what has previously been shown (1 week–3 months16–18)”

    From Chlamydia pneumoniae can infect the central nervous system via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and contributes to Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results sections report C. pneumoniae antigen in the brain at one month after infection and viable organisms in the olfactory bulbs at one and three months; viable organisms were recovered from cerebral tissue in one mouse at three months. The paper does not report CNS infection at one week, so it supports the months-long portion of the cited range but not its one-week endpoint. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Control uninfected mice exhibited diffuse Aβ deposits.

    “while control uninfected mice exhibited diffuse Aβ deposits (Fig. 5P) which is similar to previous reports16,18,50.”

    From Chlamydia pneumoniae can infect the central nervous system via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and contributes to Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Results section (‘Identification and distribution of amyloid antigen in the central nervous system’; page unavailable) reports a low but detectable number of amyloid-immunoreactive sites in mock-infected control mice at 2, 3, and 4 months. It does not describe those deposits as diffuse, so it supports their presence but not the claimed morphology. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The mice used in these studies were wild-type mice and not mouse models of Alzheimer's disease, suggesting that C. pneumoniae can contribute to the neuropathologies associated with late-onset dementia.

    “Importantly, the mice used in these studies were wild-type mice and not mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting that C. pneumoniae can contribute to the neuropathologies associated with late-onset dementia.”
  • C. pneumoniae DNA, antigen and/or live bacteria have been detected in the brain of inoculated mice, which resulted in Aβ deposition or altered appearance of Aβ deposits.

    “C. pneumoniae DNA, antigen and/or live bacteria have been detected in the brain of inoculated mice15–18, which resulted in Aβ deposition16,17 or altered appearance of Aβ deposits18.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Alkadhi K. A. Srivareerat M. Tran T. T. (2010). Intensification of long-term memory deficit by chronic stress and prevention by nicotine in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 45 289– 296 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.06.018 20624465 · DOI
  2. Balin B. J. Gerard H. C. Arking E. J. Appelt D. M. Branigan P. J. Abrams J. T. (1998). Identification and localization of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the Alzheimer’s brain. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 187 23– 42 10.1007/s004300050071 9749980 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Balin B. Hammond C. Little C. S. Appelt D. Hingley S. (2011). “Evidence for an infectious etiology in Alzheimer’s disease,” in Advanced Understanding of Neurodegenerative Diseases ed. Chang R. C.-C. InTech. doi:10.5772/29247. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-understanding-of-neurodegenerative-diseases/evidence-for-an-infectious-etiology-in-alzheimer-s-disease"> · DOI
  4. Boelen E. Stassen F. R. van der Ven A. J. Lemmens M. A. Steinbusch H. P. Bruggeman C. A. (2007). Detection of amyloid beta aggregates in the brain of BALB/c mice after Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Acta Neuropathol. 114 255– 261 10.1007/s00401-007-0252-3 17581756 PMC2039821 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Campbell S. Yates P. S. Waters F. Richmond S. J. (1991). Purification of Chlamydia trachomatis by a simple and rapid filtration method. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137 1565– 1569 10.1099/00221287-137-7-1565 1955851 · DOI
  6. Fargo K. Bleiler L. (2014). Alzheimer’s association report. Alzheimers Dement. 10 e47– e92. 24818261
  7. Gerard H. C. Dreses-Werringloer U. Wildt K. S. Deka S. Oszust C. Balin B. J. (2006). Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae in the Alzheimer’s brain. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 48 355– 366 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00154.x 17052268 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Goate A. Chartier-Harlin M. C. Mullan M. Brown J. Crawford F. Fidani L. (1991). Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 349 704– 776 10.1038/349704a0 1671712 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hall A. M. Roberson E. D. (2012). Mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. Bull. 88 3– 12 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.11.017 22142973 PMC3546481 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hawkes C. A. Deng L. Fenili D. Nitz M. McLaurin J. (2012). In vivo uptake of beta-amyloid by non-plaque associated microglia. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 9 890– 901 10.2174/156720512803251084 22272621 · DOI
  11. Hebert L. E. Scherr P. A. Bienias J. L. Bennett D. A. Evans D. A. (2003). Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. Arch. Neurol. 60 1119– 1122 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119 12925369 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Itzhaki R. F. Wozniak M. A. Appelt D. M. Balin B. J. (2004). Infiltration of the brain by pathogens causes Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 25 619– 627 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.12.021 15172740 · DOI
  13. Kumar A. Seghal N. Naidu P. S. Padi S. S. Goyal R. (2007). Colchicines-induced neurotoxicity as an animal model of sporadic dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Pharmacol. Rep. 59 274– 283. 17652827
  14. Little C. S. Bowe A. Lin R. Litsky J. Fogel R. M. Balin B. J. (2005). Age alterations in extent and severity of experimental intranasal infection with Chlamydophila pneumoniae in BALB/c mice. Infect. Immun. 73 1723– 1734 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1723-1734.2005 15731073 PMC1064908 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Little C. S. Hammond C. J. MacIntyre A. Balin B. J. Appelt D. M. (2004). Chlamydia pneumoniae induces Alzheimer-like amyloid plaques in brains of BALB/c mice. Neurobiol. Aging 25 419– 429 10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00127-1 15013562 · DOI · Paper page
  16. McManus R. M. Higgins S. C. Mills K. H. Lynch M. A. (2014). Respiratory infection promotes T cell infiltration and amyloid-beta deposition in APP/PS1 mice. Neurobiol. Aging 35 109– 121 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.025 23993702 · DOI
  17. Rogaev E. I. Sherrington R. Rogaeva E. A. Levesque G. Ikeda M. Liang Y. (1995). Familial Alzheimer’s disease in kindreds with missense mutations in a gene on chromosome 1 related to the Alzheimer’s disease type 3 gene. Nature 376 775– 778 10.1038/376775a0 7651536 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Wang X. L. Zeng J. Feng J. Tian Y. T. Liu Y. J. Qiu M. (2014). Helicobacter pylori filtrate impairs spatial learning and memory in rats and increases beta-amyloid by enhancing expression of presenilin-2. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6: 66 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00066 PMC3990046 24782763 · DOI
  19. Wisniewski T. Sigurdsson E. M. (2010). Murine models of Alzheimer’s disease and their use in developing immunotherapies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1802 847– 859 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.05.004 20471477 PMC2930136 · DOI
  20. Wolfe M. S. (2007). When loss is gain: reduced presenilin proteolytic function leads to increased Abeta42/Abeta40. Talking point on the role of presenilin mutations in Alzheimer disease. EMBO Rep. 8 136– 140 10.1038/sj.embor.7400896 17268504 PMC1796780 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Little, C. S., Joyce, T. A., Hammond, C. J., Matta, H., Cahn, D., Appelt, D. M., & Balin, B. J.
Affiliations
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Little, Christopher S.
Venue
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Published
2014-12-05
Volume
6
Pages
304-304
ISSN
1663-4365 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080023640
Cited by
71
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - PCOM (Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Osteopathic Heritage Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
Chlamydia pneumoniae, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta deposition, olfactory bulb, intranasal infection, BALB/c mice, central nervous system infection, bacterial antigen detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review