Cited by 64Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Language impairment in Alzheimer’s disease—Robust and explainable evidence for AD-related deterioration of spontaneous speech through multilingual machine learning

Open access
Lindsay, Hali, Tröger, Johannes, König, Alexandra·2021·Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a pervasive neurodegenerative disease that affects millions worldwide and is most prominently associated with broad cognitive decline, including language impairment. Picture description tasks are routinely used to monitor language impairment in AD. Due to the high amount of manual resources needed for an in-depth analysis of thereby-produced spontaneous speech, advanced natural language processing (NLP) combined with machine learning (ML) represents a promising opportunity. In this applied research field though, NLP and ML methodology do not necessarily ensure robust clinically actionable insights into cognitive language impairment in AD and additional precautions must be taken to ensure clinical-validity and generalizability of results. In this study, we add generalizability through multilingual feature statistics to computational approaches for the detection of language impairment in AD. We include 154 participants (78 healthy subjects, 76 patients with AD) from two different languages (106 English speaking and 47 French speaking). Each participant completed a picture description task, in addition to a battery of neuropsychological tests. Each response was recorded and manually transcribed. From this, task-specific, semantic, syntactic and paralinguistic features are extracted using NLP resources. Using inferential statistics, we determined language features, excluding task specific features, that are significant in both languages and therefore represent "generalizable" signs for cognitive language impairment in AD. In a second step, we evaluated all features as well as the generalizable ones for English, French and both languages in a binary discrimination ML scenario (AD vs. healthy) using a variety of classifiers. The generalizable language feature set outperforms the all language feature set in English, French and the multilingual scenarios. Semantic features are the most generalizable while paralinguistic features show no overlap between languages. The multilingual model shows an equal distribution of error in both English and French. By leveraging multilingual statistics combined with a theory-driven approach, we identify AD-related language impairment that generalizes beyond a single corpus or language to model language impairment as a clinically-relevant cognitive symptom. We find a primary impairment in semantics in addition to mild syntactic impairment, possibly confounded by additional impaired cognitive functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnagi.2021.642033

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Alzheimer's disease, the contribution of semantic, syntactic and paralinguistic features for disease identification differs between speakers of English and French.

    “As shown in a machine learning study, the contribution of semantic, syntactic and paralinguistic features for disease identifica tion differs between speakers of English and French. 110”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fraser K. C. Linz N. Li B. Fors K. L. Rudzicz F. König A.. (2019). “ Multilingual prediction of Alzheimer’s disease through domain adaptation and concept-based language modelling,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), (Minnesota, MN: Association for Computational Linguistics), 3659– 3670. 10.18653/v1/N19-1367 · DOI
  2. Goodglass H. Kaplan E. Weintraub S. (2001). BDAE: The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  3. Orimaye S. O. Wong S. M. Golden (Abuzahra) K. J. (2014). “ Learning predictive languistic features for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias using verbal utterances,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (ACL 2014), eds Toutannova K. Wu H. (Baltimore, MD: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)), 78– 87.
  4. Pahikkala T. Airola A. Boberg J. Salakoski T. (2008). “ Exact and efficient leave-pair-out cross-validation for ranking RLS,” in Proceedings of AKRR, Espoo, Finland, 1– 8.
  5. Robin J. Kaufmann L. Simpson W. (2020). “ Evaluation of speech-based digital biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease,” in Poster Presented at the 13th Clinical Trials on Alzheimer’s Disease (CTAD) Conference, digital event, Boston, MA, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindsay, H., Tröger, J., & König, A.
Affiliations
  • German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE)
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Corresponding author
Lindsay, Hali
Venue
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Published
2021-05-19
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
642033-642033
ISSN
1663-4365 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3161827824
Cited by
64
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IS20075)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (777222)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, language impairment, spontaneous speech, picture description task, semantic features, syntactic features, paralinguistic features, natural language processing, machine learning classification, clinical validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review