The DOI matches its Crossref record; 252 of the 255 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Behavior in the Home Cage: Study Design, Applications, Challenges, and Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
The reproducibility crisis (or replication crisis) in biomedical research is a particularly existential and under-addressed issue in the field of behavioral neuroscience, where, in spite of efforts to standardize testing and assay protocols, several known and unknown sources of confounding environmental factors add to variance. Human interference is a major contributor to variability both within and across laboratories, as well as novelty-induced anxiety. Attempts to reduce human interference and to measure more "natural" behaviors in subjects has led to the development of automated home-cage monitoring systems. These systems enable prolonged and longitudinal recordings, and provide large continuous measures of spontaneous behavior that can be analyzed across multiple time scales. In this review, a diverse team of neuroscientists and product developers share their experiences using such an automated monitoring system that combines Noldus PhenoTyper® home-cages and the video-based tracking software, EthoVision® XT, to extract digital biomarkers of motor, emotional, social and cognitive behavior. After presenting our working definition of a “home-cage”, we compare home-cage testing with more conventional out-of-cage tests (e.g., the open field) and outline the various advantages of the former, including opportunities for within-subject analyses and assessments of circadian and ultradian activity. Next, we address technical issues pertaining to the acquisition of behavioral data, such as the fine-tuning of the tracking software and the potential for integration with biotelemetry and optogenetics. Finally, we provide guidance on which behavioral measures to emphasize, how to filter, segment, and analyze behavior, and how to use analysis scripts. We summarize how the PhenoTyper has applications to study neuropharmacology as well as animal models of neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric illness. Looking forward, we examine current challenges and the impact of new developments. Examples include the automated recognition of specific behaviors, unambiguous tracking of individuals in a social context, the development of more animal-centered measures of behavior and ways of dealing with large datasets. Together, we advocate that by embracing standardized home-cage monitoring platforms like the PhenoTyper, we are poised to directly assess issues pertaining to reproducibility, and more importantly, measure features of rodent behavior under more ethologically relevant scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, more sophisticated methods are becoming available for continuous recording and scoring of behavior in a home cage (Greico et al., 2021).”
From The rough-and-tumble play of rats as a natural behavior suitable for studying the social brain (2022) · cites this paper as Greico et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat
Pellow, S., Chopin, P., File, S. E., & Briley, M. (1985) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(85)90031-7 · Cited by 5,822
DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning
Mathis, A., Mamidanna, P., Cury, K. M., Abe, T., Murthy, V. N., Mathis, M. W., & Bethge, M. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y · Cited by 5,187
The tail suspension test: A new method for screening antidepressants in mice
Steru, L., Chermat, R., Thierry, B., & Simon, P. (1985) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00428203 · Cited by 3,534
Behavioural despair in rats: A new model sensitive to antidepressant treatments
Porsolt, R. D., Anton, G., Blavet, N., & Jalfre, M. (1978) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0014-2999(78)90118-8 · Cited by 3,138
The use of a plus-maze to measure anxiety in the mouse
Lister, R. G. (1987) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00177912 · Cited by 2,617
Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes
Castellanos, F. X., & Tannock, R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn896 · Cited by 1,827 · cited 1×
“Deficits in attention and impulse control are hallmarks of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; Castellanos and Tannock, 2002; Luck and Gold, 2008).”
BackgroundSex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research
Beery, A. K., & Zucker, I. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.002 · Cited by 1,763
Genetics of Mouse Behavior: Interactions with Laboratory Environment
Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D., & Dudek, B. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5420.1670 · Cited by 1,666
A standardized protocol for repeated social defeat stress in mice
Golden, S. A., Covington, H. E., Berton, O., & Russo, S. J. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.361 · Cited by 1,581
Shank3 mutant mice display autistic-like behaviours and striatal dysfunction
Peça, J., Feliciano, C., Ting, J. T., Wang, W., Wells, M. F., Venkatraman, T. N., Lascola, C. D., Fu, Z., & Feng, G. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09965 · Cited by 1,570
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 255 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bailey, 2009, Anxiety-related behaviors in mice, 77
- de Heer, 2008, Learning (in) the PhenoTyper: an integrative approach to conducting cognitive behavioural challenges in a home cage environment
- Russell, 1959, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique.tif.
- Salvetti, 2012, Evaluation of alterations in behaviour, cognition and neuronal excitability induced by administration of QTracker °800 quantum dots, Measuring Behav., 2012, 362
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–110 of 110
Strategies for Optimizing Genetic Mouse Models to Enhance the Understanding of Parkinson’s Disease
Shen, Z., Ma, L., & Mellick, G. D. (2026) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines14051162
Ochi, S., Azuma, M., hara, I., Inada, H., Takabayashi, K., & Osumi, N. (2026) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2026.110816
Response of leopard geckos ( Eublepharis macularius ) towards a multimodal cue simulating a predator
Frýdlová, P., Hirschler, D., Chomik, A., Pšeničková, E., Landová, E., & Frynta, D. (2026) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arag062
SqueakPose Studio, an end-to-end platform for pose estimation and real-time edge-AI deploymentPreprint
Haggerty, D. L., Darden, C. B., & Lovinger, D. M. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.111308
SqueakPose Studio: An end-to-end platform for pose estimation and real-time edge-AI deploymentPreprint
Haggerty, D. L., Darden, C. B., & Lovinger, D. M. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.111308.1
Borodacheva, J. V., Shamsiev, I. D., & Shalaginova, I. G. (2026) · Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s11055-026-02049-1
Active learning in DeepRod enables efficient discovery of granular behavioral phenotypes
Garafolj, M., Dragan, V., Loy, A., Schauerte, H., Eschmann, K., Behnke, H., Khamlichi, F.-Z., Schwarz, P., Weiss, B., Rast, G. F., et al. (2026) · Current Research in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.crbeha.2026.100228
Macáková, K., Szabó, J., Skybová, E., Vlková, B., Borbélyová, V., & Celec, P. (2026) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116495
Bikovski, L., & Võikar, V. (2026) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2026.110917
Self-citationMartos, D., Lőrinczi, B., Szatmári, I., Vécsei, L., & Tanaka, M. (2025) · doi:10.20944/preprints202504.1511.v2 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Grieco, F., Bernstein, B. J., Biemans, B., Bikovski, L., Burnett, C. J., Cushman, J. D., van Dam, E. A., Fry, S. A., Richmond-Hacham, B., Homberg, J. R., Kas, M. J. H., Kessels, H. W., Koopmans, B., Krashes, M. J., Krishnan, V., Logan, S., Loos, M., McCann, K. E., Parduzi, Q., Pick, C. G., Prevot, T. D., Riedel, G., Robinson, L., Sadighi, M., Smit, A. B., Sonntag, W., Roelofs, R. F., Tegelenbosch, R. A. J., & Noldus, L. P. J. J.
- Affiliations
- Noldus Information Technology (NL)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Sylics (Netherlands) (NL)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Noldus, Lucas P.J.J.
- ORCID
- Grieco, Fabrizio
- Bernstein, Briana J.
- Biemans, Barbara
- Bikovski, Lior
- Burnett, C. Joseph
- Cushman, Jesse D.
- van Dam, Elsbeth A.
- Fry, Sydney A.
- Richmond-Hacham, Bar
- Homberg, Judith R.
- Kas, Martien J. H.
- Kessels, Helmut W.
- Koopmans, Bastijn
- Krashes, Michael J.
- Krishnan, Vaishnav
- Logan, Sreemathi
- Loos, Maarten
- McCann, Katharine E.
- Parduzi, Qendresa
- Pick, Chaim G.
- Riedel, Gernot
- Robinson, Lianne
- Smit, August B.
- Sonntag, William
- Noldus, Lucas P.J.J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-09-24
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 735387-735387
- ISSN
- 1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8498589
- OpenAlex
- W3200442339
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 255
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 14.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R00AG056662)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM125528)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- home cage monitoring, automated video tracking, digital biomarkers, rodent behavior, replication crisis, human disturbance, biotelemetry, optogenetics, behavioral segmentation, neuropharmacology, animal models of neurodegeneration, within-subject analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
