Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unsupervised learning of digit recognition using spike-timing-dependent plasticity

Open access
Diehl, Peter U., Cook, Matthew·2015·Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Abstract

In order to understand how the mammalian neocortex is performing computations, two things are necessary; we need to have a good understanding of the available neuronal processing units and mechanisms, and we need to gain a better understanding of how those mechanisms are combined to build functioning systems. Therefore, in recent years there is an increasing interest in how spiking neural networks (SNN) can be used to perform complex computations or solve pattern recognition tasks. However, it remains a challenging task to design SNNs which use biologically plausible mechanisms (especially for learning new patterns), since most such SNN architectures rely on training in a rate-based network and subsequent conversion to a SNN. We present a SNN for digit recognition which is based on mechanisms with increased biological plausibility, i.e., conductance-based instead of current-based synapses, spike-timing-dependent plasticity with time-dependent weight change, lateral inhibition, and an adaptive spiking threshold. Unlike most other systems, we do not use a teaching signal and do not present any class labels to the network. Using this unsupervised learning scheme, our architecture achieves 95% accuracy on the MNIST benchmark, which is better than previous SNN implementations without supervision. The fact that we used no domain-specific knowledge points toward the general applicability of our network design. Also, the performance of our network scales well with the number of neurons used and shows similar performance for four different learning rules, indicating robustness of the full combination of mechanisms, which suggests applicability in heterogeneous biological neural networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fncom.2015.00099

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Abbott, 1999, Temporally asymmetric hebbian learning, spike timing and neuronal response variability, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 11, 69
  2. Azghadi, 2014, Tunable low energy, compact and high performance neuromorphic circuit for spike-based synaptic plasticity, PLoS ONE, 9, e88326, 10.1371/journal.pone.0088326 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088326
  3. Barroso, 2005, The price of performance, Queue, 3, 48, 10.1145/1095408.1095420 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Benjamin, 2014, Neurogrid: a mixed-analog-digital multichip system for large-scale neural simulations, Proc. IEEE, 102, 699, 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2313565 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Beyeler, 2013, Categorization and decision-making in a neurobiologically plausible spiking network using a stdp-like learning rule, Neural Netw., 48, 109, 10.1016/j.neunet.2013.07.012 · DOI
  6. Bi, 1998, Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type, J. Neurosci., 18, 10464, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10464.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bichler, 2012, Extraction of temporally correlated features from dynamic vision sensors with spike-timing-dependent plasticity, Neural Netw., 32, 339, 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.02.022 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Brader, 2007, Learning real-world stimuli in a neural network with spike-driven synaptic dynamics, Neural Comput., 19, 2881, 10.1162/neco.2007.19.11.2881 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Coates, 2012, Learning feature representations with k-means, 561, 10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_30 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Diehl, 2014, Efficient implementation of stdp rules on spinnaker neuromorphic hardware, 4288, 10.1109/IJCNN.2014.6889876 · DOI
  11. Diehl, 2015, Fast-classifying, high-accuracy spiking deep networks through weight and threshold balancing, 10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280696 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fritzke, 1995, A growing neural gas network learns topologies, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 7, 625
  13. Galluppi, 2014, A framework for plasticity implementation on the spinnaker neural architecture, Front. Neurosci., 8, 10.3389/fnins.2014.00429 · DOI
  14. Goodhill, 1994, The role of weight normalization in competitive learning, Neural Comput., 6, 255, 10.1162/neco.1994.6.2.255 · DOI
  15. Goodman, 2008, Brian: a simulator for spiking neural networks in python, Front. Neuroinform., 2, 5, 10.3389/neuro.11.005.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Habenschuss, 2012, Homeostatic plasticity in bayesian spiking networks as expectation maximization with posterior constraints, 773
  17. Hinton, 2006, Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks, Science, 313, 504, 10.1126/science.1127647 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hussain, 2014, Improved margin multi-class classification using dendritic neurons with morphological learning, 2640, 10.1109/ISCAS.2014.6865715 · DOI
  19. Indiveri, 2006, A vlsi array of low-power spiking neurons and bistable synapses with spike-timing dependent plasticity, Neural Netw. IEEE Trans., 17, 211, 10.1109/TNN.2005.860850 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Javed, 2010, Brain and high metabolic rate organ mass: contributions to resting energy expenditure beyond fat-free mass, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 91, 907, 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28512 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Jug, 2012, On Competition and Learning in Cortical Structures
  22. Khan, 2008, Spinnaker: mapping neural networks onto a massively-parallel chip multiprocessor, 2849, 10.1109/IJCNN.2008.4634199 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kheradpisheh, 2015, Bio-inspired unsupervised learning of visual features leads to robust invariant object recognition, arXiv, 1504.03871, 1 · arXiv
  24. Kohonen, 1990, The self-organizing map, Proc. IEEE, 78, 1464, 10.1109/5.58325 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Larochelle, 2009, Exploring strategies for training deep neural networks, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 10, 1
  26. Leñero-Bardallo, 2010, A signed spatial contrast event spike retina chip, 2438, 10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537152 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2010.5537152
  27. Masquelier, 2007, Unsupervised learning of visual features through spike timing dependent plasticity, PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e31, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030031 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Mayr, 2015, A biological-realtime neuromorphic system in 28 nm CMOS using low-leakage switched capacitor circuits, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., 10.1109/TBCAS.2014.2379294 · DOI
  29. McClelland, 1986, Parallel distributed processing, Explor. Microstruct. Cogn., 2, 1
  30. Merolla, 2011, A digital neurosynaptic core using embedded crossbar memory with 45pj per spike in 45nm, 1, 10.1109/CICC.2011.6055294 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Merolla, 2014, A million spiking-neuron integrated circuit with a scalable communication network and interface, Science, 345, 668, 10.1126/science.1254642 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Morrison, 2007, Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in balanced random networks, Neural Comput., 19, 1437, 10.1162/neco.2007.19.6.1437 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Neftci, 2013, Event-driven contrastive divergence for spiking neuromorphic systems, Front. Neurosci., 7, 10.3389/fnins.2013.00272 · DOI
  34. Neil, 2014, Minitaur, an event-driven fpga-based spiking network accelerator, Very Large Scale Int. Syst. IEEE Trans., 22, 2621, 10.1109/TVLSI.2013.2294916 · DOI · Paper page
  35. O'Connor, 2013, Real-time classification and sensor fusion with a spiking deep belief network, Front. Neurosci., 7, 10.3389/fnins.2013.00178 · DOI · Paper page
  36. O'Reilly, 2000, Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain, 10.7551/mitpress/2014.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Park, 2014, A 65k-neuron 73-mevents/s 22-pj/event asynchronous micro-pipelined integrate-and-fire array transceiver, 10.1109/BioCAS.2014.6981816 · DOI
  38. Pfister, 2006, Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timing-dependent plasticity, J. Neurosci., 26, 9673, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1425-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Posch, 2010, High-dr frame-free pwm imaging with asynchronous aer intensity encoding and focal-plane temporal redundancy suppression, 2430, 10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537150 · DOI
  40. Querlioz, 2013, Immunity to device variations in a spiking neural network with memristive nanodevices, Nanotechnol. IEEE Trans., 12, 288, 10.1109/TNANO.2013.2250995 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Querlioz, 2011a, Simulation of a memristor-based spiking neural network immune to device variations, 1775, 10.1109/IJCNN.2011.6033439 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Querlioz, 2011b, Learning with memristive devices: How should we model their behavior?, 150, 10.1109/NANOARCH.2011.5941497 · DOI
  43. Rahimi Azghadi, 2014, Spike-based synaptic plasticity in silicon: Design, implementation, application, and challenges, Proc. IEEE, 102, 717, 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2314454 · DOI
  44. Rumelhart, 1985, Learning internal representations by error propagation, 10.21236/ADA164453 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Turrigiano, 2004, Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 5, 97, 10.1038/nrn1327 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Zhao, 2014, Feedforward categorization on AER motion events using cortex-like features in a spiking neural network, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Sys., 54, 981, 10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2362542 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,452

Metadata

Authors
Diehl, P. U., & Cook, M.
Venue
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Published
2015-08-03
Volume
9
Pages
99-99
ISSN
1662-5188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1570411240
Cited by
1,452
References
3
FWCI
30.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised learning of digit recognition using spike-timing-dependent plasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fncom.2015.00099
The paper
Diehl, P. U., & Cook, M. (2015). Unsupervised learning of digit recognition using spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2015.00099

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.