CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 326Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 141 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.

Worth a glance: Using eye movements to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of memory.

Open access
Hannula, Deborah E.·2010·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00166PMC PMC2995997
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Results of several investigations indicate that eye movements can reveal memory for elements of previous experience. These effects of memory on eye movement behavior can emerge very rapidly, changing the efficiency and even the nature of visual processing without appealing to verbal reports and without requiring conscious recollection. This aspect of eye movement based memory investigations is particularly useful when eye movement methods are used with special populations (e.g., young children, elderly individuals, and patients with severe amnesia), and also permits use of comparable paradigms in animals and humans, helping to bridge different memory literatures and permitting cross-species generalizations. Unique characteristics of eye movement methods have produced findings that challenge long-held views about the nature of memory, its organization in the brain, and its failures in special populations. Recently, eye movement methods have been successfully combined with neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI, single-unit recording, and magnetoencephalography, permitting more sophisticated investigations of memory. Ultimately, combined use of eye-tracking with neuropsychological and neuroimaging methods promises to provide a more comprehensive account of brain-behavior relationships and adheres to the "converging evidence" approach to cognitive neuroscience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00166

Cites

141 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 143 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tole J. R. Stephens A. T. Vivaudou M. Harris R. L. Ephrath A. R. (1982). “Entropy, instrument scan, and pilot workload. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society (New York: IEEE), 588– 592

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–325 of 325

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hannula, D. E.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin System (US)
Corresponding author
Hannula, Deborah E.
ORCID
Hannula, Deborah E.
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2010
Volume
4
Pages
166-166
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fnhum.2010.00166
PMC
PMC2995997
OpenAlex
W2136580022
Cited by
326
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh062500-13)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01‐MH062500, K08MH082116)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
eye movements, eye tracking, memory, visual processing, implicit memory, amnesia, cross-species generalization, neuroimaging integration, converging evidence, brain-behavior relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review