Cited by 9Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchTactile and Sensory InteractionsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Normal Evoked Response to Rapid Sequences of Tactile Pulses in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Open access
Ganesan, Santosh, Khan, Sheraz, Garel, Keri-Lee A., Hämäläinen, Matti S., Kenet, Tal·2016·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a developmental disorder diagnosed behaviorally, with many documented neurophysiological abnormalities in cortical response properties. While abnormal sensory processing is not considered core to the disorder, most ASD individuals report sensory processing abnormalities. Yet, the neurophysiological correlates of these abnormalities have not been fully mapped. In the auditory domain, studies have shown that cortical responses in the early auditory cortex in ASD are abnormal in multiple ways. In particular, it has been shown that individuals with ASD have abnormal cortical auditory evoked responses to rapid, but not slow, sequences of tones. In parallel, there is substantial evidence of somatosensory processing abnormalities in ASD, including in the temporal domain. Here, we tested the somatosensory domain in ASD for abnormalities in rapid processing of tactile pulses, to determine whether abnormalities there parallel those observed in the auditory domain. Specifically, we tested the somatosensory cortex response to a sequence of two tactile pulses with different (short and long) temporal separation. We analyzed the responses in cortical space, in primary somatosensory cortex. As expected, we found no group difference in the evoked response to pulses with long (700 ms) temporal separation. Contrary to findings in the auditory domain, we also found no group differences in the evoked responses to the sequence with a short (200 ms) temporal separation. These results suggest that rapid temporal processing deficits in ASD are not generalized across multiple sensory domains, and are unlikely to underlie the behavioral somatosensory abnormalities observed in ASD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00433

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temporal processing deficits in ASD are not generalized across multiple sensory domains.

    “However, multisensory integration (MSI) is thought to be distinctive in ASD (Ainsworth et al. 2020) (Table 2), with temporal processing deficits that are not generalized across multiple sensory domains (Ganesan et al. 2016).”

    From Autism Spectrum Disorder and auditory sensory alterations: a systematic review on the integrity of cognitive and neuronal functions related to auditory processing (2023) · cites this paper as Ganesan et al. 2016

    The Abstract says the results suggest that rapid temporal processing deficits in ASD are not generalized across multiple sensory domains. The citing sentence presents that inference as a fact, without the paper’s qualifier; the study compared tactile responses with findings in the auditory domain. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deficits in auditory discrimination have been found in MEG and brain imaging studies in ASD.

    “Deficits in auditory discrimination have also been found both in MEG and brain imaging studies (Ganesan et al. 2016; Claesdotter-Knutsson et al. 2019; Abrams et al. 2019).”

    From Autism Spectrum Disorder and auditory sensory alterations: a systematic review on the integrity of cognitive and neuronal functions related to auditory processing (2023) · cites this paper as Ganesan et al. 2016

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports a prior MEG finding of impaired rapid temporal processing of two tones in ASD, supporting a narrower auditory-processing claim. This paper’s own MEG experiment tested tactile pulses, not auditory discrimination; the cited passages do not establish a separate brain-imaging finding of auditory discrimination deficits. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Abu-Dahab S. M. Skidmore E. R. Holm M. B. Rogers J. C. Minshew N. J. (2013). Motor and tactile-perceptual skill differences between individuals with high-functioning autism and typically developing individuals ages 5-21. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 2241– 2248. 10.1007/s10803-011-1439-y 22318760 PMC3408783 · DOI
  2. Benasich A. A. Tallal P. (2002). Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behav. Brain Res. 136, 31– 49. 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00098-0 12385788 · DOI
  3. Bolognini N. Papagno C. Moroni D. Maravita A. (2010). Tactile temporal processing in the auditory cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 1201– 1211. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21267 19413471 · DOI
  4. Briggs R. W. Dy-Liacco I. Malcolm M. P. Lee H. Peck K. K. Gopinath K. S.. (1998). A pneumatic vibrotactile stimulation device for fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 51, 640– 643. 10.1002/mrm.10732 15004811 · DOI
  5. Cascio C. McGlone F. Folger S. Tannan V. Baranek G. Pelphrey K. A.. (2008). Tactile perception in adults with autism: a multidimensional psychophysical study. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 38, 127– 137. 10.1007/s10803-007-0370-8 17415630 PMC2185746 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Coskun M. A. Loveland K. A. Pearson D. A. Papanicolaou A. C. Sheth B. R. (2013). Interaction of finger representations in the cortex of individuals with autism: a functional window into cortical inhibition. Autism Res. 6, 542– 549. 10.1002/aur.1314 23983203 PMC4059006 · DOI
  7. Dale A. M. Fischl B. Sereno M. I. (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis. Segmentation, I. and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179– 194. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 9931268 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dale A. M. Liu A. K. Fischl B. R. Buckner R. L. Belliveau J. W. Lewine J. D.. (2000). Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26, 55– 67. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81138-1 10798392 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fischl B. Sereno M. I. Dale A. M. (1999a). Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9, 195– 207. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396 9931269 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fischl B. Sereno M. I. Tootell R. B. Dale A. M. (1999b). High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 272– 284. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-4 10619420 PMC6873338 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Flagg E. J. Cardy J. E. Roberts W. Roberts T. P. (2005). Language lateralization development in children with autism: insights from the late field magnetoencephalogram. Neurosci. Lett. 386, 82– 87. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.05.037 16046066 · DOI
  12. Francisco E. Holden J. Zhang Z. Favorov O. Tommerdahl M. (2011). Rate dependency of vibrotactile stimulus modulation. Brain Res. 1415, 76– 83. 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.043 21872222 · DOI
  13. Gage N. M. Siegel B. Roberts T. P. (2003). Cortical auditory system maturational abnormalities in children with autism disorder: an MEG investigation. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 144, 201– 209. 10.1016/S0165-3806(03)00172-X 12935917 · DOI
  14. Gramfort A. Luessi M. Larson E. Engemann D. A. Strohmeier D. Brodbeck C.. (2013). MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Front. Neurosci. 7: 267. 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 24431986 PMC3872725 · DOI
  15. Gramfort A. Luessi M. Larson E. Engemann D. A. Strohmeier D. Brodbeck C.. (2014). MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage 86, 446– 460. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027 24161808 PMC3930851 · DOI
  16. Hämäläinen M. S. Sarvas J. (1989). Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36, 165– 171. 10.1109/10.16463 2917762 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Khan S. Gramfort A. Shetty N. R. Kitzbichler M. G. Ganesan S. Moran J. M.. (2013). Local and long-range functional connectivity is reduced in concert in autism spectrum disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 3107– 3112. 10.1073/pnas.1214533110 23319621 PMC3581984 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Khan S. Michmizos K. Tommerdahl M. Ganesan S. Kitzbichler M. G. Zetino M.. (2015). Somatosensory cortex functional connectivity abnormalities in autism show opposite trends, depending on direction and spatial scale. Brain 138, 1394– 1409. 10.1093/brain/awv043 25765326 PMC5013931 · DOI
  19. Lin F. H. Witzel T. Ahlfors S. P. Stufflebeam S. M. Belliveau J. W. Hämäläinen M. S. (2006). Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates. Neuroimage 31, 160– 171. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.054 16520063 · DOI
  20. Marco E. J. Hinkley L. B. Hill S. S. Nagarajan S. S. (2011). Sensory processing in autism: a review of neurophysiologic findings. Pediatr. Res. 69, 48R– 54R. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182130c54 21289533 PMC3086654 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Marco E. J. Khatibi K. Hill S. S. Siegel B. Arroyo M. S. Dowling A. F.. (2012). Children with autism show reduced somatosensory response: an MEG study. Autism Res. 5, 340– 351. 10.1002/aur.1247 22933354 PMC3474892 · DOI
  22. Maris E. Oostenveld R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J. Neurosci. Methods 164, 177– 190. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 17517438 · DOI · Paper page
  23. McPartland J. Dawson G. Webb S. J. Panagiotides H. Carver L. J. (2004). Event-related brain potentials reveal anomalies in temporal processing of faces in autism spectrum disorder. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 45, 1235– 1245. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00318.x 15335344 · DOI
  24. Oram Cardy J. E. Ferrari P. Flagg E. J. Roberts W. Roberts T. P. (2004). Prominence of M50 auditory evoked response over M100 in childhood and autism. Neuroreport 15, 1867– 1870. 10.1097/00001756-200408260-00006 15305126 · DOI
  25. Oram Cardy J. E. Flagg E. J. Roberts W. Brian J. Roberts T. P. (2005). Magnetoencephalography identifies rapid temporal processing deficit in autism and language impairment. Neuroreport 16, 329– 332. 10.1097/00001756-200503150-00005 15729132 · DOI
  26. Oram Cardy J. E. Flagg E. J. Roberts W. Roberts T. P. (2008). Auditory evoked fields predict language ability and impairment in children. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 68, 170– 175. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.10.015 18304666 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Piro J. M. (1998). Handedness and intelligence: patterns of hand preference in gifted and nongifted children. Dev. Neuropsychol. 14, 619– 630. 10.1080/87565649809540732 · DOI
  28. Roberts T. P. Cannon K. M. Tavabi K. Blaskey L. Khan S. Y. Monroe J. F.. (2011). Auditory magnetic mismatch field latency: a biomarker for language impairment in autism. Biol. Psychiatry 70, 263– 269. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.015 21392733 PMC3134608 · DOI
  29. Roberts T. P. Khan S. Y. Rey M. Monroe J. F. Cannon K. Blaskey L.. (2010). MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism. Autism Res. 3, 8– 18. 10.1002/aur.111 20063319 PMC3099241 · DOI
  30. Tannan V. Dennis R. G. Tommerdahl M. (2005). Stimulus-dependent effects on tactile spatial acuity. Behav. Brain Funct. 1: 18. 10.1186/1744-9081-1-18 16216121 PMC1277816 · DOI
  31. Taulu S. Kajola M. Simola J. (2004). Suppression of interference and artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method. Brain Topogr. 16, 269– 275. 10.1023/B:BRAT.0000032864.93890.f9 15379226 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Taulu S. Simola J. (2006). Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 1759– 1768. 10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/008 16552102 · DOI
  33. Wiggins L. D. Robins D. L. Bakeman R. Adamson L. B. (2009). Breif report: sensory abnormalities as distinguishing symptoms of autism spectrum disorders in young children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 39, 1087– 1091. 10.1007/s10803-009-0711-x 19283461 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Ganesan, S., Khan, S., Garel, K.-L. A., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Kenet, T.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kenet, Tal
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2016-09-16
Volume
10
Pages
433-433
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2510320015
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01HD073254, 5R01EB009048, P41EB015896)
  • Simons Foundation (SFARI 239395)
  • Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
  • National Science Foundation (1042134)
  • Autism Speaks
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, somatosensory evoked potentials, primary somatosensory cortex, sensory processing abnormalities, interstimulus interval, auditory cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review