Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Directions in the Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation I – A Physiological Perspective

Open access
Kaniusas, Eugenijus, Kampusch, Stefan, Tittgemeyer, Marc, Panetsos, Fivos, Gines, Raquel Fernandez, Papa, Michele, Kiss, Attila, Podesser, Bruno, Cassara, Antonino Mario, Tanghe, Emmeric, Samoudi, Amine Mohammed, Tarnaud, Thomas, Joseph, Wout, Marozas, Vaidotas, Lukosevicius, Arunas, Ištuk, Niko, Šarolić, Antonio, Lechner, Sarah, Klonowski, Wlodzimierz, Varoneckas, Giedrius, Széles, Jozsef Constantin·2019·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the auricular vagus nerve (aVNS) is an emerging technology in the field of bioelectronic medicine with applications in therapy. Modulation of the afferent vagus nerve affects a large number of physiological processes and bodily states associated with information transfer between the brain and body. These include disease mitigating effects and sustainable therapeutic applications ranging from chronic pain diseases, neurodegenerative and metabolic ailments to inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases. Given the current evidence from experimental research in animal and clinical studies we discuss basic aVNS mechanisms and their potential clinical effects. Collectively, we provide a focussed review on the physiological role of the vagus nerve and formulate a biology-driven rationale for aVNS. For the first time, two international workshops on aVNS have been held in Warsaw and Vienna in 2017 within the framework of EU COST Action “European network for innovative uses of EMFs in biomedical applications (BM1309)”. Both workshops focussed critically on the driving physiological mechanisms of aVNS, its experimental and clinical studies in animals and humans, in-silico aVNS studies, technological advancements, and regulatory barriers. The results of the workshops are covered in two reviews, covering physiological and engineering aspects. The present review summarizes on physiological aspects - a discussion of engineering aspects is provided by our accompanying article (Kaniusas et al., 2019). Both reviews build a reasonable bridge from the rationale of aVNS as a therapeutic tool to current research lines, all of them being highly relevant for the promising aVNS technology to reach the patient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2019.00854

Cites

205 of 205 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 205 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Kaniusas, E., Kampusch, S., Tittgemeyer, M., Panetsos, F., Gines, R. F., Papa, M., Kiss, A., Podesser, B., Cassara, A. M., Tanghe, E., Samoudi, A. M., Tarnaud, T., Joseph, W., Marozas, V., Lukosevicius, A., Ištuk, N., Šarolić, A., Lechner, S., Klonowski, W., Varoneckas, G., & Széles, J. C.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2019-08-09
Volume
13
Pages
854-854
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964477120
Cited by
323
References
205
FWCI
11.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Directions in the Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation I – A Physiological Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2019.00854
The paper
Kaniusas, E., Kampusch, S., Tittgemeyer, M., Panetsos, F., Gines, R. F., Papa, M., Kiss, A., Podesser, B., Cassara, A. M., Tanghe, E., Samoudi, A. M., Tarnaud, T., Joseph, W., Marozas, V., Lukosevicius, A., Ištuk, N., Šarolić, A., Lechner, S., Klonowski, W., . . . Széles, J. C. (2019). Current Directions in the Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation I – A Physiological Perspective. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00854

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.