Cited by 74Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Brain Networks Underlying Eye’s Pupil Dynamics

Open access
DiNuzzo, Mauro, Mascali, Daniele, Moraschi, Marta, Bussu, Giorgia, Maugeri, Laura, Mangini, Fabio, Fratini, Michela, Giove, Federico·2019·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Phasic changes in eye's pupil diameter have been repeatedly observed during cognitive, emotional and behavioral activity in mammals. Although pupil diameter is known to be associated with noradrenergic firing in the pontine Locus Coeruleus (LC), thus far the causal chain coupling spontaneous pupil dynamics to specific cortical brain networks remains unknown. In the present study, we acquired steady-state blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data combined with eye-tracking pupillometry from fifteen healthy subjects that were trained to maintain a constant attentional load. Regression analysis revealed widespread visual and sensorimotor BOLD-fMRI deactivations correlated with pupil diameter. Furthermore, we found BOLD-fMRI activations correlated with pupil diameter change rate within a set of brain regions known to be implicated in selective attention, salience, error-detection and decision-making. These regions included LC, thalamus, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), dorsal anterior cingulate and paracingulate cortex (dACC/PaCC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and right anterior insular cortex (rAIC). Granger-causality analysis performed on these regions yielded a complex pattern of interdependence, wherein LC and pupil dynamics were far apart in the network and separated by several cortical stages. Functional connectivity (FC) analysis revealed the ubiquitous presence of the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) in the networks identified by the brain regions correlated to the pupil diameter change rate. No significant correlations were observed between pupil dynamics, regional activation and behavioral performance. Based on the involved brain regions, we speculate that pupil dynamics reflects brain processing implicated in changes between self- and environment-directed awareness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2019.00965

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pupil diameter was fairly stable at around 6.5-7 mm on average during all fMRI and 1H-fMRS epochs across conditions.

    “Pupil diameter, an index of the noradrenergic tone (DiNuzzo et al., 2019), was fairly stable at around 6.5–7 mm on average during all fMRI (Figure 1—figure supplement 2) and 1H-fMRS (Figure 3—figure supplement 2) epochs (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.99 and p = 0.98, for fMRI runs 1 and 2, respectively, and p = 0.98 and p = 0.96 for 1H-fMRS runs 1 and 2, respectively) across conditions (see also Video 1),”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiNuzzo, M., Mascali, D., Moraschi, M., Bussu, G., Maugeri, L., Mangini, F., Fratini, M., & Giove, F.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • Centro Ricerche Enrico Fermi (IT)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Istituto di Nanotecnologia (IT)
Corresponding author
DiNuzzo, Mauro
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2019-09-18
Volume
13
Pages
965-965
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971177595
Cited by
74
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministero della Salute (GR-2013-02358177)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
pupil dynamics, locus coeruleus, cortical deactivation, functional connectivity, Granger causality, superior frontal gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, orbitofrontal cortex, attentional load, pupillometry, BOLD fMRI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review