Cited by 606Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBehavioral Health and InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Heart rate variability reflects self-regulatory strength, effort, and fatigue

Segerstrom, Suzanne C., Nes, Lise Solberg·2007·Psychological Science

Abstract

Experimental research reliably demonstrates that self-regulatory deficits are a consequence of prior self-regulatory effort. However, in naturalistic settings, although people know that they are sometimes vulnerable to saying, eating, or doing the wrong thing, they cannot accurately gauge their capacity to self-regulate at any given time. Because self-regulation and autonomic regulation colocalize in the brain, an autonomic measure, heart rate variability (HRV), could provide an index of self-regulatory strength and activity. During an experimental manipulation of self-regulation (eating carrots or cookies), HRV was elevated during high self-regulatory effort (eat carrots, resist cookies) compared with low self-regulatory effort (eat cookies, resist carrots). The experimental manipulation and higher HRV at baseline independently predicted persistence at a subsequent anagram task. HRV appears to index self-regulatory strength and effort, making it possible to study these phenomena in the field as well as the lab.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01888.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High resting cardiac vagal control predicts persistence on a difficult anagram task.

    “Segerstrom and Solberg Nes (2007) found that high resting CVC predicted persistence on a difficult anagram task.”

    From Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health (2010) · cites this paper as Segerstrom and Solberg Nes (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segerstrom, S. C., & Nes, L. S.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Segerstrom, Suzanne C.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2007-03
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
275-281
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2033837921
Cited by
606
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
heart rate variability, self-regulation, self-regulatory fatigue, autonomic regulation, task persistence, dietary habits, anagram task
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Electrocardiography, Physical Exertion, Fatigue, Female, Food Preferences, Heart Rate, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Motivation, Social Control, Informal, Students, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review