Cited by 84Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBody Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Body Roundness Index and Waist–Hip Ratio Result in Better Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification: Results From a Large Chinese Cross-Sectional Study

Open access
Li, Ying, He, Yongmei, Yang, Lin, Liu, Qingqi, Li, Chao, Wang, Yaqin, Yang, Pingting, Wang, Jiangang +2 more·2022·Frontiers in Nutrition

Abstract

Background: The appropriate optimal anthropometric indices and their thresholds within each BMI category for predicting those at a high risk of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVDRFs) among the Chinese are still under dispute. Objectives: We aimed to identify the best indicators of CVDRFs and the optimal threshold within each BMI category among the Chinese. Methods: Between 2012 and 2020, a total of 500,090 participants were surveyed in Hunan, China. Six anthropometric indices including waist circumference (WC), a body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index (BRI), waist–hip ratio (WHR), hip circumference (HC), and waist–height ratio (WHtR) were evaluated in the present study. Considered CVDRFs included dyslipidaemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The associations of anthropometrics with CVDRFs within each BMI category were evaluated through logistic regression models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess the predictive abilities. Results: For the presence of at least one CVDRFs, the WHR had the highest AUROC in overweight [0.641 (95%CI:0.638, 0.644)] and obese [0.616 (95%CI:0.609, 0.623)] men. BRI had the highest AUROC in underweight [0.649 (95%CI:0.629, 0.670)] and normal weight [0.686 (95%CI:0.683, 0.690)] men. However, the BRI had the highest discrimination ability among women in all the BMI categories, with AUROC ranging from 0.641 to 0.727. In most cases, the discriminatory ability of WHtR was similar to BRI and was easier to calculate; therefore, thresholds of BRI, WHR, and WHtR for CVDRFs identification were all calculated. In men, BRI thresholds of 1.8, 3.0, 3.9, and 5.0, WHtR thresholds of 0.41, 0.48, 0.53, and 0.58, and WHR thresholds of 0.81, 0.88, 0.92, and 0.95 were identified as optimal thresholds across underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese populations, respectively. The corresponding BRI values in women were 1.9, 2.9, 4.0, and 5.2, respectively, and WHtR were 0.41, 0.48, 0.54, and 0.59, while the WHR values were 0.77, 0.83, 0.88, and 0.90. The recommended BRI, WHtR, or WHR cut-offs could not statistically differentiate high-risk CKD or hypercholesterolemia populations. Conclusions: We found that BRI and WHR were superior to other indices for predicting CVD risk factors, except CKD or hypercholesterolemia, among the Chinese.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnut.2022.801582

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BRI is well-documented as a robust predictor of diabetes, including prediabetes, cardiometabolic disorders, and metabolic syndrome.

    “The BRI is well-documented as a robust predictor of diabetes, including prediabetes, cardiometabolic disorders, and metabolic syndrome32–34.”

    From The nonlinear association between body roundness index and infertility in married women (2025) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) calls BRI a good predictor of metabolic syndrome, and the Results report that BRI discriminated diabetes and several cardiovascular risk factors in the studied Chinese population. The paper does not report prediabetes as an outcome. Its cross-sectional findings concern identification of existing conditions, rather than prediction of future diabetes, so the claim is broader than this source supports. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. [1]Must A Spadano J Coakley EH Field AE Colditz G Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. (1999) 282: 1523– 9. 10.1001/jama.282.16.1523 10546691 · DOI
  2. [2]Lauby-Secretan B Scoccianti C Loomis D Grosse Y Bianchini F Straif K. Body Fatness and Cancer–Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375: 794– 8. 10.1056/NEJMsr1606602 27557308 PMC6754861 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Ayton A Ibrahim A. Obesity is a public health emergency. BMJ. (2019) 366: l5463. 10.1136/bmj.l5463 31519652 · DOI
  4. [4]Yin Y Li Y Shao L Yuan S Liu B Lin S. Effect of Body Mass Index on the Prognosis of Liver Cirrhosis. Front Nutr. (2021) 8: 700132. 10.3389/fnut.2021.700132 34490322 PMC8417598 · DOI
  5. [5]Anstey KJ Cherbuin N Budge M Young J. Body mass index in midlife and late-life as a risk factor for dementia: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Obes Rev. (2011) 12: e426– 437. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00825.x 21348917 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Singh GM Danaei G Farzadfar F Stevens GA Wood ward M Wormser D. The age-specific quantitative effects of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a pooled analysis. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8: e65174. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065174 23935815 PMC3728292 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [7]Czernichow S Kengne AP Stamatakis E Hamer M Batty GD. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: which is the better discriminator of cardiovascular disease mor- tality risk?: evidence from an individual-participant meta-analysis of 82 864 participants from nine cohort studies. Obes Rev. (2011) 12: 680– 7. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00879.x 21521449 PMC4170776 · DOI
  8. [8]Tzoulaki I Elliott P Kontis V Ezzati M. Worldwide Exposures to Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Associated Health Effects: Current Knowledge and Data Gaps. Circulation. (2016) 133: 2314– 33. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.008718 27267538 · DOI
  9. [9]Lee DY Lee MY Sung KC. Prediction of Mortality with A Body Shape Index in Young Asians: Comparison with Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference. Obesity (Silver Spring). (2018) 26: 1096– 103. 10.1002/oby.22193 29719128 · DOI
  10. [10]Jayedi A Soltani S Zargar MS Khan TA Shab-Bidar S. Central fatness and risk of all cause mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 72 prospective cohort studies. BMJ. (2020) 370: m3324. 10.1136/bmj.m3324 32967840 PMC7509947 · DOI
  11. [11]Heymsfield SB Scherzer R Pietrobelli A Lewis CE Grunfeld C. Int J Obes (Lond). (2009) 12: 1363– 73. 10.1038/ijo.2009.184 19773739 PMC3156622 · DOI
  12. [13]Zhang FL Ren JX Zhang P Jin H Qu Y Yu Y. Strong Association of Waist Circumference (WC), Body Mass Index (BMI), Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR), and Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR) with Diabetes: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Jilin Province, China. J Diabetes Res. (2021) 2021: 8812431. 10.1155/2021/8812431 34056007 PMC8147550 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [14]Ashwell M Gunn P Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. (2012) 13: 275– 86. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00952.x 22106927 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Kuk JL Ardern CI. Influence of age on the association between various measures of obesity and all-cause mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2009) 57: 2077– 84. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02486.x 19754497 · DOI
  15. [17]Rico-Martín S Calderón-García JF Sánchez-Rey P Franco-Antonio C Martínez Alvarez M Sánchez Muñoz-Torrero JF. Effectiveness of body roundness index in predicting metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. (2020) 21: e13023. 10.1111/obr.13023 32267621 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [18]Calderón-García JF Roncero-Martín R Rico-Martín S De Nicolás-Jiménez JM López-Espuela F Santano-Mogena E. Effectiveness of Body Roundness Index (BRI) and a Body Shape Index (ABSI) in Predicting Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18: 11607. 10.3390/ijerph182111607 34770120 PMC8582804 · DOI
  17. [19]Janssen I Katzmarzyk PT Ross R. Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health guidelines. Arch Intern Med. (2002) 162: 2074– 9. 10.1001/archinte.162.18.2074 12374515 · DOI
  18. [20]Ardern CI Katzmarzyk PT Janssen I Ross R. Discrimination of health risk by combined body mass index and waist circumference. Obes Res. (2003) 11: 135– 42. 10.1038/oby.2003.22 12529496 · DOI
  19. [21]De Vincentis A Tavaglione F Spagnuolo R Pujia R Tuccinardi D Mascianà G. Metabolic and genetic determinants for progression to severe liver disease in subjects with obesity from the UK Biobank. Int J Obes (Lond). (2021). 10.1038/s41366-021-01015-w. [Epub ahead of print]. 34750514 PMC8573310 · DOI
  20. [22]Ross R Neeland IJ Yamashita S Shai I Seidell J Magni P. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2020) 16: 177– 89. 10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7 32020062 PMC7027970 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [23]Sadeghi M Talaei M Gharipour M Oveisgharan S Nezafati P Dianatkhah M. Anthropometric indices predicting incident hypertension in an Iranian population: The Isfahan cohort study. Anatol J Cardiol. (2019) 22: 33– 43. 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.10594 31264654 PMC6683211 · DOI
  22. [24]Christakoudi S Tsilidis KK Muller DC Freisling H Weiderpass E Overvad K. A Body Shape Index (ABSI) achieves better mortality risk stratification than alternative indices of abdominal obesity: results from a large European cohort. Sci Rep. (2020) 10: 14541. 10.1038/s41598-020-71302-5 32883969 PMC7471961 · DOI
  23. [25]Korhonen PE Jaatinen PT Aarnio PT Kantola IM Saaresranta T. Waist circumference home measurement–a device to find out patients in cardiovascular risk. Eur J Public Health. (2009) 19: 95– 9. 10.1093/eurpub/ckn090 18927187 · DOI
  24. [26]Chen C Lu FC. Department of Disease Control Ministry of Health, PR China. The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci. (2004) 17 Suppl: 1– 36. 15807475
  25. [27]Krakauer NY Krakauer JC. A new body shape index predicts mortality hazard independently of body mass index. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7: e39504. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039504 22815707 PMC3399847 · DOI
  26. [28]Thomas DM Bredlau C Bosy-Westphal A Mueller M Shen W Gallagher D. Relationships between body roundness with body fat and visceral adipose tissue emerging from a new geometrical model. Obesity (Silver Spring). (2013) 21: 2264– 71. 10.1002/oby.20408 23519954 PMC3692604 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [29]Joint committee issued Chinese guideline for the management of dyslipidemia in adults. [2016 Chinese guideline for the management of dyslipidemia in adults]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. (2016) 44: 833– 53. [in Chinese]. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2016.10.005 27903370 · DOI
  28. [30]Joint Committee for Guideline Revision. 2018 Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension-A report of the Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension. J Geriatr Cardiol. (2019) 16: 182- 241. 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.03.014 31080465 PMC6500570 · DOI
  29. [31]Chinese Diabetes Society. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in China (2020 Edition). (Part 1). Chin J Pract Intern Med. (2021) 41: 668– 95. [in Chinese]. 10.19538/j.nk2021080106 · DOI
  30. [32]Matsushita K Mahmoodi BK Woodward M Emberson JR Jafar TH Jee SH. Comparison of risk prediction using the CKD-EPI equation and the MDRD study equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate. JAMA. (2012) 307: 1941– 51. 10.1001/jama.2012.3954 22570462 PMC3837430 · DOI
  31. [33]Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. (2013) 3: 1– 150. 10.1038/kisup.2012.73 · DOI
  32. [34]Deurenberg P Deurenberg-Yap M Guricci S. Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obes Rev. (2002) 3: 141– 6. 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2002.00065.x 12164465 · DOI
  33. [35]Dalton M Cameron AJ Zimmet PZ Shaw JE Jolley D Dunstan DW. Waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and body mass index and their correlation with cardiovascular disease risk factors in Australian adults. J Intern Med. (2003) 254: 555– 63. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2003.01229.x 14641796 · DOI
  34. [36]Dobbelsteyn CJ Joffres MR MacLean DR Flowerdew G. A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors. The Canadian Heart Health Surveys. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. (2001) 25: 652– 61. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801582 11360147 · DOI
  35. [37]Nguyen Minh Q Nguyen Vo MH. Anthropometric Indexes for Predicting High Blood Pressure in Vietnamese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Integr Blood Press Control. (2020) 13: 181– 6. 10.2147/IBPC.S281996 33293857 PMC7718968 · DOI
  36. [38]Lee CM Huxley RR Wildman RP Woodward M. Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. (2008) 61: 646– 53. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.012 18359190 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [39]Chang Y Guo X Chen Y Guo L Li Z Yu S. A body shape index and body roundness index: two new body indices to identify diabetes mellitus among rural populations in northeast China. BMC Public Health. (2015) 15: 794. 10.1186/s12889-015-2150-2 26286520 PMC4544789 · DOI · Paper page
  38. [40]Corrêa MM Thumé E De Oliveira ER Tomasi E. Performance of the waist-to-height ratio in identifying obesity and predicting non-communicable diseases in the elderly population: a systematic literature review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2016) 65: 174– 82. 10.1016/j.archger.2016.03.021 27061665 · DOI
  39. [41]Kapoor N Lotfaliany M Sathish T Thankappan KR Thomas N Furler J. Obesity indicators that best predict type 2 diabetes in an Indian population: insights from the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. J Nutr Sci. (2020) 9: e15. 10.1017/jns.2020.8 32328239 PMC7163399 · DOI
  40. [42]Dhana K Kavousi M Ikram MA Tiemeier HW Hofman A Franco OH. Body shape index in comparison with other anthropometric measures in prediction of total and cause-specific mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2016) 70: 90– 6. 10.1136/jech-2014-205257 26160362 · DOI
  41. [43]Song X Jousilahti P Stehouwer CD Söderberg S Onat A Laatikainen T. Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in relation to various anthropometric measures of obesity in Europeans. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2015) 25: 295– 304. 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.09.004 25315666 · DOI
  42. [44]He S Zheng Y Wang H Chen X. Assessing the relationship between a body shape index and mortality in a group of middle-aged men. Clin Nutr. (2017) 36: 1355– 9. 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.003 27663543 · DOI
  43. [45]Fujita M Sato Y Nagashima K Takahashi S Hata A. Predictive power of a body shape index for development of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in Japanese adults: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10: e0128972. 10.1371/journal.pone.0128972 26030122 PMC4451769 · DOI
  44. [46]Zhao Q Zhang K Li Y Zhen Q Shi J Yu Y. Capacity of a body shape index and body roundness index to identify diabetes mellitus in Han Chinese people in Northeast China: a cross-sectional study. Diabet Med. (2018) 35: 1580– 7. 10.1111/dme.13787 30059165 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [47]Feng J He S Chen X. Body Adiposity Index and Body Roundness Index in Identifying Insulin Resistance Among Adults Without Diabetes. Am J Med Sci. (2019) 357: 116– 23. 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.11.006 30665492 · DOI
  46. [48]Zhang N Chang Y Guo X Chen Y Ye N Sun Y. Body Shape Index and Body Roundness Index: Two new body indices for detecting association between obesity and hyperuricemia in rural area of China. Eur J Intern Med. (2016) 29: 32– 6. 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.01.019 26895753 · DOI
  47. [49]Stefanescu A Revilla L Lopez T Sanchez SE Williams MA Gelaye B. Using A Body Shape Index (ABSI) and Body Roundness Index (BRI) to predict risk of metabolic syndrome in Peruvian adults. J Int Med Res. (2020) 48: 300060519848854. 10.1177/0300060519848854 31144540 PMC7140225 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [50]Liu Y Liu X Guan H Zhang S Zhu Q Fu X. Body Roundness Index Is a Superior Obesity Index in Predicting Diabetes Risk Among Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study in China. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2021) 8: 736073. 10.3389/fcvm.2021.736073 34869638 PMC8638826 · DOI
  49. [51]Maessen MF Eijsvogels TM Verheggen RJ Hopman MT Verbeek AL de Vegt F. Entering a new era of body indices: the feasibility of a body shape index and body roundness index to identify cardiovascular health status. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9: e107212. 10.1371/journal.pone.0107212 25229394 PMC4167703 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [52]Lee BJ Kim JY. Identification of Type 2 Diabetes Risk Factors Using Phenotypes Consisting of Anthropometry and Triglycerides based on Machine Learning. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. (2016) 20: 39– 46. 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2396520 25675467 · DOI
  51. [53]Ardern CI Janssen I Ross R Katzmarzyk PT. Development of health-related waist circumference thresholds within BMI categories. Obes Res. (2004) 12: 1094– 103. 10.1038/oby.2004.137 15292473 · DOI
  52. [54]Lee BJ Yim MH. Comparison of anthropometric and body composition indices in the identification of metabolic risk factors. Sci Rep. (2021) 11: 9931. 10.1038/s41598-021-89422-x 33976292 PMC8113511 · DOI
  53. [55]Zhou M Wang H Zeng X Yin P Zhu J Chen W. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. (2019) 394: 1145– 58. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30427-1 31248666 PMC6891889 · DOI
  54. [56]Matsuo T Sairenchi T Iso H Irie F Tanaka K Fukasawa N. Age- and gender-specific BMI in terms of the lowest mortality in Japanese general population. Obesity (Silver Spring). (2008) 16: 2348– 55. 10.1038/oby.2008.342 18719651 · DOI
  55. [57]de Hollander EL Van Zutphen M Bogers RP Bemelmans WJ De Groot LC. The impact of body mass index in old age on cause-specific mortality. J Nutr Health Aging. (2012) 16: 100– 6. 10.1007/s12603-011-0077-6 22238008 · DOI
  56. [58]Guerra RS Amaral TF Marques EA Mota J Restivo MT. Anatomical location for waist circumference measurement in older adults: a preliminary study. Nutr Hosp. (2012) 27:1554-61. 10.3305/nh.2012.27.5.5922 23478705 · DOI
  57. [59]Smits N. A note on Youden's J and its cost ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2010) 10: 89. 10.1186/1471-2288-10-8 20920288 PMC2959030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., He, Y., Yang, L., Liu, Q., Li, C., Wang, Y., Yang, P., Wang, J., Chen, Z., & Huang, X.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Aerospace Center Hospital (CN)
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Hunan Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Xin
Venue
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2022-03-10
Volume
9
Pages
801582-801582
ISSN
2296-861X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221119244
Cited by
84
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872685, 81973324, 82003537)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ4439, 2020JJ5858)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
body roundness index, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, anthropometric indices, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular risk stratification, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, Chinese population, sex differences, underweight, overweight, obesity, abdominal obesity, visceral fat, body shape index, hip circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review