Cited by 49Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Effects of probiotic supplementation on inflammatory markers and glucose homeostasis in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Ding, Li-Na, Ding, Wen-Yu, Ning, Jie, Wang, Yao, Yan, Yan, Wang, Zhi-Bin·2021·Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract

Background: Several studies have revealed the effect of probiotic supplementation in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on the amelioration of low-grade inflammation, which plays an important role in the pathogenesis of T2DM. However, the effects of the clinical application of probiotics on inflammation in individuals with T2DM remain inconsistent. This study aims to investigate the comprehensive effects of probiotics on inflammatory markers in adults with T2DM. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effect of probiotic supplementation on inflammatory markers in individuals with T2DM through March 11, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. We used a random-effects model to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) between the probiotic supplementation and control groups. Results: Seventeen eligible studies were selected with a total of 836 participants, including 423 participants in probiotic supplementation groups and 413 participants in control groups. Our study demonstrated that compared with the control condition, probiotic intake produced a beneficial effect in reducing the levels of plasma inflammation markers, including tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (SMD [95% CI]; −0.37 [−0.56, −0.19], p < 0.0001) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD [95% CI]; −0.21 [−0.42, −0.01], p = 0.040), while it had no effect on the plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) level (SMD [95% CI]; −0.07 [−0.27, 0.13], p = 0.520). In addition, our results support the notion that probiotic supplementation improves glycaemic control, as evidenced by a significant reduction in fasting blood glucose (FPG), HbA1c and HOMA-IR (SMD [95% CI]: −0.24 [−0.42, −0.05], p = 0.010; −0.19 [−0.37, −0.00], p = 0.040; −0.36 [−0.62, −0.10], p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusion: Our study revealed some beneficial effects of probiotic supplementation on improving inflammatory markers and glucose homeostasis in individuals with T2DM. Probiotics might be a potential adjuvant therapeutic approach for T2DM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2021.770861

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consumption of probiotics can improve inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein) and glycemic control and insulin metabolism in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome, including pregnant women with gestational diabetes.

    “Studies also show that the consumption of probiotics can improve inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein) and glycemic control and insulin metabolism in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome [143,144,145,146,147], including pregnant women with gestational diabetes [143,144].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, L.-N., Ding, W.-Y., Ning, J., Wang, Y., Yan, Y., & Wang, Z.-B.
Affiliations
  • Shandong First Medical University (CN)
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yan, Yan
  • Wang, Zhi-Bin
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2021-12-10
Volume
12
Pages
770861-770861
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200394658
Cited by
49
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81800753)
  • Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong (2018YYSP030)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2017YL009 ZR2019PH096)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
probiotic supplementation, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory markers, low-grade inflammation, TNF-α, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, glucose homeostasis, glycemic control, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, fasting blood glucose, insulin sensitivity, gut microbiota, dietary supplementation, risk of bias, publication bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review