Cited by 27Radiation Therapy and DosimetryParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsIon-surface interactions and analysis

Hybrid Active-Passive Space Radiation Simulation Concept for GSI and the Future FAIR Facility

Open access
Schuy, Christoph, Weber, Uli, Durante, Marco·2020·Frontiers in Physics

Abstract

Space radiation is acknowledged as one of the main health risks for human exploration of the Solar system. Solar particle events (SPE) and the galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) can cause significant early and late morbidity, and damage mission critical microelectronics. Systematic studies of the interaction of energetic heavy ions with biological and electronic systems are typically performed at high-energy particle accelerators with a small subset of ions and energies in an independent and serialized way. This simplification can lead to inaccurate estimations of the harmful radiation effects of the full space radiation environment on man and machine. To mitigate these limitations, NASA has developed an irradiation system at the Brookhaven National Laboratory able to simulate the full GCR spectrum. ESA is also investing in ground-based space radiation studies in Europe, using the current and future facilities at GSI/FAIR in Darmstadt (Germany). We describe here an advanced hybrid active-passive space radiation simulation system to simulate GCR or SPE spectra. A predefined set of different monoenergetic 56Fe beams will be fired on specially designed beam modulators consisting of filigree periodic structures. Their thickness, composition and geometry per used primary beam energy are optimized via 1D-transport calculations in such a way that the superposition of the produced radiation fields at the target position closely simulate the GCR in different scenarios. The highly complex modulators will be built using state-of-the-art manufacturing techniques like 3D-printing and precision casting. A Monte Carlo simulation of the spectrum produced in this setup is reported.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphy.2020.00337

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is now possible to simulate the full GCR spectrum on Earth in USA and European accelerators, which will pave the way to realistic RBE estimation of the full GCR.

    “Rather than studying single ions it is now possible to simulate the full GCR spectrum on Earth both in USA23 and European24 accelerators and this will pave the way to realistic RBE estimation of the full GCR.”

    From Towards sustainable human space exploration—priorities for radiation research to quantify and mitigate radiation risks (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Abstract says NASA’s Brookhaven system can simulate the full GCR spectrum, while the European GSI/FAIR system is a concept under development. The Conclusion says its first GCR in-beam tests were planned for 2021, so the paper does not establish that full-spectrum simulation was already possible at a European accelerator. It also does not state that these systems will enable realistic RBE estimation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Mewaldt RA, Cohen CMS, Labrador AW, Leske RA, Mason GM, Desai MI, et al. Proton, helium, and electron spectra during the large solar particle events of October-November 2003. J Geophys Res Space Phys. (2005) 110:1- 23. doi: 10.1029/2005JA011038 · DOI
  2. Simpson JA. Elemental and isotopic composition of the galactic cosmic rays. Ann Rev Nucl Part Sci. (1983) 33:323- 82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ns.33.120183.001543 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Mazur JE, Crain WR, Looper MD, Mabry DJ, Blake JB, Case AW, et al. New measurements of total ionizing dose in the lunar environment. Space Weather. (2011) 9:S07002. doi: 10.1029/2010SW000641 · DOI
  4. Narici L, Berger T, Matthiä D, Reitz G. Radiation measurements performed with active detectors relevant for human space exploration. Front Oncol. (2015) 5:273. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00273 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Guo J, Zeitlin C, Wimmer-Schweingruber RF, Hassler DM, Posner A, Heber B, et al. Variations of dose rate observed by MSL/RAD in transit to Mars. Astron Astrophys. (2015) 577:A58. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201 525680 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ehresmann B, Zeitlin C, Hassler DM, Wimmer-Schweingruber RF, Böhm E, Böttcher S, et al. Charged particle spectra obtained with the mars science laboratory radiation assessment detector (MSL/RAD) on the surface of mars. J Geophys Res Planets. (2014) 119:468-79. doi: 10.1002/2013JE004547 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Sihver L. Physics and biophysics experiments needed for improved risk assessment in space. Acta Astronaut. (2008) 63:886-98. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.04.013 · DOI
  8. Chancellor JC, Blue RS, Cengel KA, Auñón-Chancellor SM, Rubins KH, Katzgraber HG, et al. Limitations in predicting the space radiation health risk for exploration astronauts. NPJ Microgravity. (2017) 8:1- 11. doi: 10.1038/s41526-018-0043-2 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kim MHY, Rusek A, Cucinotta FA. Issues for simulation of galactic cosmic ray exposures for radiobiological research at ground-based accelerators. Front Oncol. (2015) 5:1-14. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00122 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Durante M, Indelicato P, Jonson B, Koch V, Langanke K, Meißner UG, et al. All the fun of the FAIR: fundamental physics at the facility for antiproton and ion research. Phys Scr. (2018) 94:033001. doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/aaf93f · DOI · Paper page
  11. Stöhlker T, Bagnoud V, Blaum K, Blazevic A, Bräuning-Demian A, Durante M, et al. APPA at FAIR: from fundamental to applied research. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B. (2015) 365:680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2015. 07.077 · DOI
  12. Timoshenko GN, Krylov AR, Paraipan M, Gordeev IS. Particle accelerator-based simulation of the radiation environment on board spacecraft for manned interplanetary missions. Radiat Meas. (2017) 107:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.10.006 · DOI
  13. Chancellor JC, Guetersloh SB, Cengel KA, Ford JR, Katzgraber HG. Emulation of the space radiation environment for materials testing and radiobiological experiments. arXiv Peprint arXiv:1706.02727v1 (2017). · arXiv
  14. Chancellor JC, Guetersloh SB, Blue RS, Cengel KA, Ford JR, Katzgraber HG. Targeted nuclear spallation from moderator block design for a ground-based space radiation analog. arXiv Peprint arXiv:1706.02727v2 (2019). · arXiv
  15. Simeonov Y, Weber U, Penchev P, Ringbæk TP, Schuy C, Brons S, et al. 3D range-modulator for scanned particle therapy: development, Monte Carlo simulations and experimental evaluation. Phys Med Biol. (2017) 62:7075- 96. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa81f4 · DOI
  16. Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Araujo H, Arce P, et al. Geant4-a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res A. (2003) 506:250- 303. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Araujo H, Dubois PA, Asai M, et al. Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. (2006) 53:270- 8. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2006.869826 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Arce P, Asai M, Aso T, et al. Recent developments in Geant4. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res A. (2016) 835:186- 225. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Brun R, Rademakers F. ROOT-an object oriented data analysis framework. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sec A. (1997) 389:81-6. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00048-X · DOI
  20. Krämer M, Jäkel O, Haberer T, Kraft G, Schardt D, Weber U. Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization. Phys Med Biol. (2000) 45:3299-317. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/313 · DOI
  21. Kraemer M. Swift ions in radiotherapy -Treatment planning with TRiP98. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sec B. (2009) 267:989-92. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.02.015 · DOI
  22. Akagi T, Higashi A, Tsugami H, Sakamoto H, Masuda Y, Hishikawa Y. Ridge filter design for proton therapy at Hyogo Ion Beam medical center. Phys Med Biol. (2003) 48:N301-12. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/22/N01 · DOI
  23. Poole CM, Cornelius I, Trapp JV, Langton CM. A CAD interface for GEANT4. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. (2012) 35:329-34. doi: 10.1007/s13246-012-0159-8 · DOI
  24. Poole CM, Cornelius I, Trapp JV, Langton CM. Fast tessellated solid navigation in GEANT4. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. (2012) 59:1695-701. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2012.2197415 · DOI
  25. Gunzert-Marx K, Iwase H, Schardt D, Simon RS. Secondary beam fragments produced by 200 MeV/u 12 C ions in water and their dose contributions in carbon ion radiotherapy. New J Phys. (2008) 10:075003. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/0 75003 · DOI
  26. Martino G, Durante M, Schardt D. Microdosimetry measurements characterizing the radiation fields of 300 MeV/u 12C and 185 MeV/u 7Li pencil beams stopping in water. Phys Med Biol. (2010) 55:3441-9. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/12/011 · DOI
  27. Townsend LW, Wilson JW, Shinn JL, Curtis SB. Human exposure to large solar particle events in space. Adv Sp Res. (1992) 12:339- 48. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(92)90126-I · DOI
  28. Wilson J, Anderson B, Cucinotta F, Ware J, Zeitlin CJ. Spacesuit Radiation Shield Design Methods. SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-2110 (2006). doi: 10.4271/2006-01-2110 · DOI
  29. Printz Ringbæk T, Simeonov Y, Witt M, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Kraft G, Zink K, et al. Modulation power of porous materials and usage as ripple filter in particle therapy. Phys Med Biol. (2017) 62:2892- 909. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5c28 · DOI
  30. Jia SB, Romano F, Cirrone GAP, Cuttone G, Hadizadeh MH, Mowlavi AA, et al. Designing a range modulator wheel to spread-out the Bragg peak for a passive proton therapy facility. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A. (2015) 806:101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2015. 10.006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuy, C., Weber, U., & Durante, M.
Affiliations
GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Durante, Marco
Venue
Frontiers in Physics
Published
2020-08-31
Volume
8
ISSN
2296-424X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082536157
Cited by
27
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • GSI Repository (German Federal Government) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Technischen Universität Darmstadt (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion)
  • Technischen Universität Darmstadt (submittedVersion)
  • Technischen Universität Darmstadt (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Ion-surface interactions and analysis
Keywords
galactic cosmic rays, solar energetic particle events, FAIR facility, GSI, radiation effects on electronics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review