Cited by 46Solar and Space Plasma DynamicsPlanetary Science and ExplorationIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

Variations of dose rate observed by MSL/RAD in transit to Mars

Open access
Guo, Jingnan, Zeitlin, Cary, Wimmer-Schweingruber, Robert F., Hassler, Donald M., Posner, Arik, Heber, Bernd, Köhler, Jan, Rafkin, Scot +9 more·2015·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Aims. To predict the cruise radiation environment related to future human missions to Mars, the correlation between solar modulation potential and the dose rate measured by the Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) has been analyzed and empirical models have been employed to quantify this correlation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201525680

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the solar modulation difference is taken into account, the TGO-measured cruise dose equivalent agrees excellently with the MSL/RAD result.

    “Empirical modeling (Guo et al. 2015a) shows that the TGO-measured dose equivalent rate is in excellent agreement with that found by MSL/RAD when this difference is taken into account.”

    From Radiation environment for future human exploration on the surface of Mars: the current understanding based on MSL/RAD dose measurements (2021) · cites this paper as Guo et al. 2015a

    Section 2.3 (page not provided) describes empirical models used to estimate MSL/RAD cruise dose rates under different solar-modulation conditions, and Section 3 reports corresponding dose-equivalent predictions. The paper does not compare those predictions with TGO measurements or establish the claimed excellent agreement. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K. A., et al. 2003, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 506, 250 · DOI
  2. Cucinotta, F. A., & Chappell, L. J. 2011, Rad. Res., 176, 102 · DOI
  3. Drake, B. G., Hoffman, S. J., & Beaty, D. W. 2010, in Aerospace Conf., 2010 IEEE, 1
  4. Efron, B. 1981, Biometrika, 68, 589 · DOI
  5. Forbush, S. 1938, Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, 43, 203 · DOI
  6. Gieseler, J., Heber, B., Dunzlaff, P., et al. 2008, in International Cosmic Ray Conf., 1, 571
  7. Gleeson, L. & Axford, W. 1968, ApJ, 154, 1011 · DOI
  8. Heber, B., Fichtner, H., & Scherer, K. 2007, in Solar Variability and Planetary Climates (Springer), 81
  9. Posner, A., Hassler, D., McComas, D., et al. 2005, Adv. Space Res., 36, 1426 · DOI
  10. Posner, A., Odstrĉil, D., MacNeice, P., et al. 2013, Planet. Space Sci., 89, 127 · DOI
  11. Simpson, J. 1983, Ann. R. Nucl. Part. Sci., 33, 323 · DOI
  12. Stigler, S. M. 1989, Stat. Sci., 73 · DOI
  13. Usoskin, I., Alanko, K., Mursula, K., & Kovaltsov, G. 2002, Sol. Phys., 207, 389 · DOI
  14. Zeitlin, C., Hassler, D., Cucinotta, F., et al. 2013, Science, 340, 1080 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, J., Zeitlin, C., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Hassler, D. M., Posner, A., Heber, B., Köhler, J., Rafkin, S., Ehresmann, B., Appel, J. K., Böhm, E., Böttcher, S., Burmeister, S., Brinza, D. E., Lohf, H., Martin, C., & Reitz, G.
Affiliations
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2015-05
Volume
577
Pages
A58
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W1968393405
Cited by
46
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (50QM1201, 50QM0501, 1273039)
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Southwest Research Institute
  • Oulun Yliopisto
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (1273039)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Keywords
Mars Science Laboratory, Radiation Assessment Detector, cosmic ray dose rate, solar modulation potential, human Mars missions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review